Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Planned as a trilogy. I told you they'd go back to this well way back when. I can't wait to come back to this fantasy world.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/03/30/harry-potter-spinoff-series-fantastic-beasts-and-where-to-find-them-planned-as-a-trilogy

Awesome. It's a great idea

"I told you". Repeating what you've read and trying to pass it off as an original thought is a silly clown move.

Next risky prediction: "They're going to make more Star Wars films at some point after the Abrams' ones."

Wonder if they'll have a middle-aged Dumbledore. Would be between his sisters death and jkinging Hogwarts right? Could be really beat and broken.

The book has nothing to do with the Potter series... so I'm really curious to see how this will be presented... IIRC, there are no characters, it's just a list of magical beasts with a little blurb about them. Which is fascinating, but I'm so curious!

Originally posted by Robtard
"I told you". Repeating what you've read and trying to pass it off as an original thought is a silly clown move.

Next risky prediction: "They're going to make more Star Wars films at some point after the Abrams' ones." Keep your insecurities out of my thread. I was correct in saying they could make another film due to the success of the most profitable movie franchise ever.

I am excited for this as I'm the biggest movie VoldeVerse fan alive.

So is this a film about Wakefield prison?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Keep your insecurities out of my thread. I was correct in saying they could make another film due to the success of the most profitable movie franchise ever.

I am excited for this as I'm the biggest movie VoldeVerse fan alive.

"I correctly repeated info I read." Bravo?

Voldermort won't be in this. Did you not read the article?

Originally posted by Robtard
"I correctly repeated info I read." Bravo?

Voldermort won't be in this. Did you not read the article? I said as much prior to this being news.


It is the same universe aka the VoldeVerse. Please read the article.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I said as much prior to this being news.


It is the same universe aka the VoldeVerse. Please read the article.

No. You said it around the time the rumors started showing up.

You didn't read the article or didn't understand it. Let me help you: It takes place 70 years before the events of the HP films, so Voldermort isn't in this.

Originally posted by Robtard
No. You said it around the time the rumors started showing up.

You didn't read the article or didn't understand it. Let me help you: It takes place 70 years before the events of the HP films, so Voldermort isn't in this. No, I said it well before when I created the most successful franchise. People were foolishly saying no way. I said never say never especially considering the heap of money the films generated.

It is the same universe he exists. 70 years before the Potter story.


It is the same universe he exists aka the VoldeVerse.

Stop lying.

Why can't you comprehend that Voldermort won't be in these films?

Originally posted by Robtard
Stop lying.

Why can't you comprehend that Voldermort won't be in these films? We don't actually know that first off. Secondly, I never said he was going to be in it but it his still his verse.

Yes we do. These films are set before Voldy was even born...

Originally posted by quanchi112
We don't actually know that first off. Secondly, I never said he was going to be in it but it his still his verse.

That tells you didn't read the article or the snippet I paraphrased for you.

Here you go again: "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is set 70 years before the events in Harry Potter"

You're welcome

Originally posted by ares834
Yes we do. These films are set before Voldy was even born... False. Originally posted by Robtard
That tells you didn't read the article or the snippet I paraphrased for you.

Here you go again: "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is set 70 years before the events in Harry Potter"

You're welcome Therefore since Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows begins in the summer of 1997, Voldemort would have been 70 years old at the time! His death takes place at the end of that 7th book on May 2nd, 1998, meaning Voldemort died at the ripe old age of 71!!


Always back my case.

Always right.

Always amazing.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Therefore since Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows begins in the summer of 1997, Voldemort would have been 70 years old at the time! His death takes place at the end of that 7th book on May 2nd, 1998, meaning Voldemort died at the ripe old age of 71!!


Always back my case.

Always right.

Always amazing.

If (I stress if) they show us a toddler Tom Riddle in these films, that's not Voldermort. Tom didn't become "Voldermort" until after he started dabbling in the Dark arts. Did you not pay attention is those silly films

So you failed to back your case.

You weren't correct

Never amazing.

Originally posted by Robtard
If (I stress if) they show us a toddler Tom Riddle in these films, that's not Voldermort.

So you failed to back your case.

You weren't correct

Never amazing. It is the same person.

1 year old. Don't embarrass yourself anymore.


You live in denial.


Ps. I hope you learned your lesson as well, ares.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It is the same person.

1 year old. Don't embarrass yourself anymore.


You live in denial.


Ps. I hope you learned your lesson as well, ares.

Watch the films, toddler Tom Riddle is not Voldermort. ie You won't be seeing Voldermort in this film, deal with it.

Originally posted by Robtard
Watch the films, toddler Tom Riddle is not Voldermort. ie You won't be seeing Voldermort in this film, deal with it. Look at my sig. That was Tom Riddle saying, I am Lord Voldemort to Harry Potter.



Watch the films already, infidel.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Look at my sig. That was Tom Riddle saying, I am Lord Voldemort to Harry Potter.



Watch the films already, infidel.

Toddler Tom Riddle is not a the Dark lord

Only you would get excited about the slimmest chance of a toddler Tom Riddle showing up. You're an odd person.

Originally posted by Robtard
Toddler Tom Riddle is not a the Dark lord

Only you would get excited about the slimmest chance of a toddler Tom Riddle showing up. You're an odd person. Its like you saying I am not the same person at age 34 as I was at age 1.

I never said I was excited. Pay attention. I said it is a possibility. That's all I said. You're not the brightest guy out there.


Tom Marvolo Riddle is Voldemort.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Its like you saying I am not the same person at age 34 as I was at age 1.

I never said I was excited. Pay attention. I said it is a possibility. That's all I said. You're not the brightest guy out there.


Tom Marvolo Riddle is Voldemort.

No, it's like saying we saw Darth Vader in ep1 when we saw little Anakin. That wold be wrong, as Anakin hadn't become Vader yet

Stop lying.

He becomes Voldemort; he isn't Voldemort when he's a toddler. Try and follow the mediocre franchise you claim to love above all others.

Originally posted by Robtard
No, it's like saying we saw Darth Vader in ep1 when we saw little Anakin. That wold be wrong, as Anakin hadn't become Vader yet

Stop lying.

He becomes Voldemort; he isn't Voldemort when he's a toddler. Try and follow the mediocre franchise you claim to love above all others. We see a younger Riddle say he was Lord Voldemort. Point proven.

You are ignorant and thought differently.

I backed my point with on screen evidence whereas you keep making baseless claims.

Originally posted by quanchi112
False. Therefore since Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows begins in the summer of 1997, Voldemort would have been 70 years old at the time! His death takes place at the end of that 7th book on May 2nd, 1998, meaning Voldemort died at the ripe old age of 71!!



So he wasn't born 70 years before the movies started... Thanks for proving my point.

Originally posted by quanchi112
We see a younger Riddle say he was Lord Voldemort. Point proven.

You are ignorant and thought differently.

I backed my point with on screen evidence whereas you keep making baseless claims.



As a younger wizard, but not as a toddler. You failed again.

Stop lying.

Show me a toddler Tom Riddle claiming he's a Dark Lord.

Originally posted by ares834
So he wasn't born 70 years before the movies started... Thanks for proving my point. The events of Harry Potter meaning their conclusion.



Next time think before taking me on.

Originally posted by Robtard
As a toddler? Nope.

Stop lying.

Show me a toddler Tom Riddle claiming he's a Dark Lord. You said until he becomes Voldemort but we see a young Riddle already declare it prior to it happening thus proving my point.



Basically your logic means every single day you're a different person. Awful logic from an awful man.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The events of Harry Potter meaning their conclusion.



Next time think before taking me on.

The "events in Harry Potter" meaning the events in Harry Potter which includes The Philosopher's Stone.

Originally posted by ares834
The "events in Harry Potter" meaning the events in Harry Potter which includes The Philosopher's Stone. No, the events mean their conclusion which wrapped it up.

Keep telling yourself that.

Originally posted by ares834
Keep telling yourself that. see you're really confused. I am telling you that, silly.

Originally posted by quanchi112
False. Therefore since Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows begins in the summer of 1997, Voldemort would have been 70 years old at the time! His death takes place at the end of that 7th book on May 2nd, 1998, meaning Voldemort died at the ripe old age of 71!!

Claims author's opinions aren't valid in movie threads. Uses book info to "back his case" in a movie thread.

Classic quan.

Originally posted by quanchi112
see you're really confused. I am telling you that, silly.

Telling me lies? Thanks I guess... If they used the word "event" you may actually have a point. But they used "events" meaning what happened.

wonderfull i think its superb idea....

http://duiattorneyhelp.com/

Originally posted by Epicurus
Claims author's opinions aren't valid in movie threads. Uses book info to "back his case" in a movie thread.

Classic quan. She is writing the screenplay and it hasn't been made into a movie yet. You are so simple it makes me giggle.

Originally posted by ares834
Telling me lies? Thanks I guess... If they used the word "event" you may actually have a point. But they used "events" meaning what happened. Yes, and the last of the events is when it ends thus I was right. As always.

TROLL! . TROLL

Though you'd want to know.

Originally posted by quanchi112
She is writing the screenplay and it hasn't been made into a movie yet. You are so simple it makes me giggle.
I am talking about you citing Voldemort's based on what the books told us, mon ami.

You use book info to validate your claims in one movie thread and then do a 180 and dismiss author quotes in another movie thread. What an awful hypocrite. LOL.

Originally posted by Epicurus
I am talking about you citing Voldemort's based on what the books told us, mon ami.

You use book info to validate your claims in one movie thread and then do a 180 and dismiss author quotes in another movie thread. What an awful hypocrite. LOL. I am citing her words regarding when this takes place. She is writing the screenplay.

The circumstances are entirely different, old sport.

You are rather confused often and don't use critical thinking ever.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am citing her words regarding when this takes place. She is writing the screenplay.

The circumstances are entirely different, old sport.

You are rather confused often and don't use critical thinking ever.
You are being a hypocrite as usual. Selectively choosing which of her claims apply to the movies. Lol, what an idiot.

Originally posted by Epicurus
You are being a hypocrite as usual. Selectively choosing which of her claims apply to the movies. Lol, what an idiot. She is writing the screenplay here. The circumstances are different. Quit repeating yourself in chimpanzee fashion.

Originally posted by quanchi112
She is writing the screenplay here. The circumstances are different. Quit repeating yourself in chimpanzee fashion.
Only hypocrites dismiss author's claims in one thread and then parade book fact as being canon to movies in another thread.

Voldemort's age is relevant to the mainstream HP series as well. If you think her word applies simply because she is involved in this project which hasn't even completely kicked off yet, then there is no other choice but to accept her word on other matters which weren't explored in the movies as well. Such as DEs being incapable of casting patronuses.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Only hypocrites dismiss author's claims in one thread and then parade book fact as being canon to movies in another thread.

Voldemort's age is relevant to the mainstream HP series as well. If you think her word applies simply because she is involved in this project which hasn't even completely kicked off yet, then there is no other choice but to accept her word on other matters which weren't explored in the movies as well. Such as DEs being incapable of casting patronuses. She is writing the screenplay. It is a different set of circumstances.


Her opinion in writing the screenplay is relevant here to when this story takes place.

Originally posted by quanchi112
She is writing the screenplay. It is a different set of circumstances.


Her opinion in writing the screenplay is relevant here to when this story takes place.


So her opinion counts for one movie but not the others. Got it. Great logic going there, hypocrisy112.

Originally posted by Epicurus
So her opinion counts for one movie but not the others. Got it. Great logic going there, hypocrisy112. It counts prior to the movie having a director and due to the fact she wrote the screenplay.



Differences, troll.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It counts prior to the movie having a director and due to the fact she wrote the screenplay.



Differences, troll.
The movie is part of the same cinematic verse as the rest of the HP series. Which means that if her word counts for this one, it counts for all.

Basic logic is far beyond your skills, Mr Selective Bias.

Originally posted by Epicurus
The movie is part of the same cinematic verse as the rest of the HP series. Which means that if her word counts for this one, it counts for all.

Basic logic is far beyond your skills, Mr Selective Bias. She is writing the screenplay thus making this an entirely different situation. Context.

Originally posted by quanchi112
She is writing the screenplay thus making this an entirely different situation. Context.
Is this movie set in a different universe from the mainstream Harry Potter cinematic verse? Answer this question with a simple yes or no.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Is this movie set in a different universe from the mainstream Harry Potter cinematic verse? Answer this question with a simple yes or no. She is given considerably more power with this franchise than she was with the last one at the moment.

Originally posted by quanchi112
She is given considerably more power with this franchise than she was with the last one at the moment.


So you're basically saying that Fantastic Beasts is set in a different cinematic universe as opposed to the HP series. So you have any concrete proof for such an asinine assumption?

Originally posted by Epicurus
So you're basically saying that Fantastic Beasts is set in a different cinematic universe as opposed to the HP series. So you have any concrete proof for such an asinine assumption? I never said that I said she has much more power and input now since she is writing the screenplay.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I never said that I said she has much more power and input now since she is writing the screenplay.
So even though these films are part of the same cinematic universe, her opinion should only apply to one series and not the other? What sort of crappy reasoning is that?

Originally posted by Epicurus
So even though these films are part of the same cinematic universe, her opinion should only apply to one series and not the other? What sort of crappy reasoning is that? Her opinion matters here since she is writing the screenplay. How many times do I have to tell you, dummy ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Her opinion matters here since she is writing the screenplay. How many times do I have to tell you, dummy ?
Even while ignoring that she was the adviser for the scripts of the rest of the HP franchise and the exec producer of the last 2 films? You are as hypocritical as they get, dork.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Even while ignoring that she was the adviser for the scripts of the rest of the HP franchise and the exec producer of the last 2 films? You are as hypocritical as they get, dork. She didn't write the entire screenplay and once it commences who knows what will be changed by the director. Quit ignoring the different circumstances.

Originally posted by quanchi112
She didn't write the entire screenplay and once it commences who knows what will be changed by the director. Quit ignoring the different circumstances.
Basically speaking, you accept her opinion for one movie which is part of the cinematic verse which she actively had a hand in building, but dismiss for all the others. Hypocrisy can't get any more blatant than in your case.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Basically speaking, you accept her opinion for one movie which is part of the cinematic verse which she actively had a hand in building, but dismiss for all the others. Hypocrisy can't get any more blatant than in your case. No, since the circumstances are different.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, since the circumstances are different.
Different like what?

Originally posted by Epicurus
Different like what? Reread the thread if your brain can't keep up.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Reread the thread if your brain can't keep up.
I did. At no point do you even begin to make a semblance of an argument in favor of your point, clownchi112.

Originally posted by Epicurus
I did. At no point do you even begin to make a semblance of an argument in favor of your point, clownchi112. Reread the thread, abhilegend's victim.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Reread the thread, abhilegend's victim.
I already did, Lestov's b1tch.

Originally posted by Epicurus
I already did, Lestov's b1tch. Wrong. Abhilegend actually defeated you. You fled the thread with your tail in between your legs.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Wrong. Abhilegend actually defeated you. You fled the thread with your tail in between your legs.
False on all counts. You on the other hand continue to get owned by Lestov as if he was your pimp.

Originally posted by Epicurus
False on all counts. You on the other hand continue to get owned by Lestov as if he was your pimp. He just makes things up. He's a little twerp. That's true whereas Abhilegend ran you off. Also true. Truth stings doesn't it, abhilegend's victim.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He just makes things up. He's a little twerp. That's true whereas Abhilegend ran you off. Also true. Truth stings doesn't it, abhilegend's victim.
Wrong. Incorrect. False. You became Lestov's personal e-b1tch. That's the Final Truth. Accept it and your heart may yet find solace, clownchi112.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Wrong. Incorrect. False. You became Lestov's personal e-b1tch. That's the Final Truth. Accept it and your heart may yet find solace, clownchi112. Lestov is afraid to leave his house. You're afraid of Abhilegend who got you into trouble. You're weak.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Lestov is afraid to leave his house. You're afraid of Abhilegend who got you into trouble. You're weak.
Lestov owns your ass. That is the Final Truth. Accept the light of the Final Truth in your heart.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Lestov owns your ass. That is the Final Truth. Accept the light of the Final Truth in your heart. Abhilegend just waxed your ass again. Can't believe you are letting him scalp your ass.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Abhilegend just waxed your ass again. Can't believe you are letting him scalp your ass.
Says the guy who ran away from this forum for months after getting just one warning.

Say hello to Lestov for me when you next visit him to provide a blowjob.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Says the guy who ran away from this forum for months after getting just one warning.

Say hello to Lestov for me when you next visit him to provide a blowjob. I was threatened with a perma and punished the movie versus by ignoring them. I won.


Abhilegend has dominated you. One on one he has been in your head.

Originally posted by quanchi112
punished the movie versus by ignoring them.

That's your idea of punishment.......

Originally posted by Firefly218
That's your idea of punishment....... Yes, they have to tend to their lives and can't disappear here.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I was threatened with a perma and punished the movie versus by ignoring them. I won.


Abhilegend has dominated you. One on one he has been in your head.
You ran like a coward when given a single warning. Awful.

Unlike this fabricated lie, I know the Final Truth. And the Final Truth is; Lestov is your pimp both online and irl.

Originally posted by Epicurus
You ran like a coward when given a single warning. Awful.

Unlike this fabricated lie, I know the Final Truth. And the Final Truth is; Lestov is your pimp both online and irl. No, I didn't. I more than quadruple your post count due to my ironclad rule over the board. You're a mere footnote.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, I didn't. I more than quadruple your post count due to my ironclad rule over the board. You're a mere footnote.
I was unaware that making a truckload of shitposts counts as a major achievement. You have a higher post count because you registered years before me and have thus been active a lot longer anyways.

Originally posted by Epicurus
I was unaware that making a truckload of shitposts counts as a major achievement. You have a higher post count because you registered years before me and have thus been active a lot longer anyways. I posted more than you have in my first eleven months than the totality of your posts over your entire run which is almost 2 years. You don't stand out.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I posted more than you have in my first eleven months than the totality of your posts over your entire run which is almost 2 years. You don't stand out.
Shitposting is an achievement in quanworld. Got it.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Shitposting is an achievement in quanworld. Got it. Your post count and your notoriety will never be mine. My post count is objective whereas your shitty opinion isn't.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Your post count and your notoriety will never be mine. My post count is objective whereas your shitty opinion isn't.
So shitposting large amounts of...well, shit, is an achievement in your mind. Got i.

Originally posted by Epicurus
So shitposting large amounts of...well, shit, is an achievement in your mind. Got i. Again, that is your shitty opinion. My post count is an objective fact you will never come close to achieving. Feel the burn, whoever you are.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Again, that is your shitty opinion. My post count is an objective fact you will never come close to achieving. Feel the burn, whoever you are.
So penning down countless shitposts is an achievement by your logic. Guess the biggest spammers on the internet are achievers then.

Originally posted by Epicurus
So penning down countless shitposts is an achievement by your logic. Guess the biggest spammers on the internet are achievers then. It is an objective fact you will never come close to achieving.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It is an objective fact you will never come close to achieving.
So you don't have a life beyond the internet. Got it.

Originally posted by Epicurus
So you don't have a life beyond the internet. Got it. I do. Thats two things you won't ever achieve.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I do. Thats two things you won't ever achieve.
Completely and utterly false. You spend so much time shitposting on the internet, it's hard to imagine that you could have even a semblance of a real life in the real world.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Completely and utterly false. You spend so much time shitposting on the internet, it's hard to imagine that you could have even a semblance of a real life in the real world. Both are possible, geek. I'm better than you.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Both are possible, geek. I'm better than you.
For you, they aren't. Only in fantasyland.

Originally posted by Epicurus
For you, they aren't. Only in fantasyland. You aren't good at anything.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You aren't good at anything.
Except for scripting, debugging, java, sculpture & painting, C, C++, calculus, karate, comic books, tv shows, movies etc.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Except for scripting, debugging, java, sculpture & painting, C, C++, calculus, karate, comic books, tv shows, movies etc. You aren't good at any of those things, nerd.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You aren't good at any of those things, nerd.
How would you know? Considering you aren't even the least bit familiar with any of that stuff.

Originally posted by Epicurus
How would you know? Considering you aren't even the least bit familiar with any of that stuff. How would you know. I am making an educated guess due to your incompetence throughout the years.

Originally posted by quanchi112
How would you know. I am making an educated guess due to your incompetence throughout the years.
Write a Knight's Tour program then. W/o copying it from a programming forum. Should be simple enough if you're at least as skilled as I am at what I do.

You and the word "educated" don't sit well together.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Write a Knight's Tour program then. W/o copying it from a programming forum. Should be simple enough if you're at least as skilled as I am at what I do.

You and the word "educated" don't sit well together. I don't have to prove anything to the person too scared to battlezone me.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I don't have to prove anything to the person too scared to battlezone me.


So you are indeed a novice at programming. Good to know.

What do you want to battlezone about?

Originally posted by Epicurus
So you are indeed a novice at programming. Good to know.

What do you want to battlezone about? I don't come here to show off my programming skills you missed abortion you.

Me representing the potter movie universe versus the Lotr movie universe minus the ghosts.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I don't come here to show off my programming skills you missed abortion you.

Me representing the potter movie universe versus the Lotr movie universe minus the ghosts.
That's because you don't have any, silly goose.

I am not interested in the LoTRverse. I'd be more than willing to accept a challenge on SPN vs Pottyverse though.

Originally posted by Epicurus
That's because you don't have any, silly goose.

I am not interested in the LoTRverse. I'd be more than willing to accept a challenge on SPN vs Pottyverse though. Sure do, nerd.


So you backed down. Yet again. Coward.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Sure do, nerd.


So you backed down. Yet again. Coward.
Write the code for a Knight's Tour program then.

If you want to debate on SPN vs Pottyverse, then I am your go-to guy. Otherwise I am not interested in wasting my time.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Write the code for a Knight's Tour program then.

If you want to debate on SPN vs Pottyverse, then I am your go-to guy. Otherwise I am not interested in wasting my time. Since you won't face me in a debate then I won't, loser.


You keep backing down just like to Abhilegend.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Since you won't face me in a debate then I won't, loser.
Concession accepted.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Concession accepted. You backed down yet again. I own you as does Abhilegend.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You backed down yet again. I own you as does Abhilegend.
Says the guy who boasts of non-existent programming skills. So you admit that you're too chicken to accept an SPNvsPottyverse debate? Thought so.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Says the guy who boasts of non-existent programming skills. So you admit that you're too chicken to accept an SPNvsPottyverse debate? Thought so. You asked what debate I told you. You backed down.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You asked what debate I told you. You backed down.
Not interested isn't the same thing as backed down. SPN vs Pottyverse is still open for debate if you're up for it, novice programmer.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Not interested isn't the same thing as backed down. SPN vs Pottyverse is still open for debate if you're up for it, novice programmer. You asked me I told you. Eire you face me or live in fear. The choice is yours, coward.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You asked me I told you. Eire you face me or live in fear. The choice is yours, coward.
So you're too afraid to do a bz against the SPNverse. Thought so.

Originally posted by Epicurus
So you're too afraid to do a bz against the SPNverse. Thought so. I never said I was interested in that. You asked and backed down like always. You have never down a battlezone. You probably never will.