The Scale of Star Wars: Wasted Potential?

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



Skybreaker
I bet this'll sound really stupid when my cognitive functions are at full capacity again.

Given that the Star Wars mythos is set across a whole galaxy, colonized by quadrillions of sentient beings and filled with more planets, stars and moons than could ever be written about, does anybody feel that the vast majority of the SW literature fails to take advantage of the sheer scale of its mythos?

Practically every significant storyline in Star Wars plays out from the perspective of a few individual characters, a few WW2-esque battles, and some isolated areas of some generic planets. The idea that the fate of the whole galactic community would, year in and year out, rest in a lightsaber duel between two individuals is both ludicrous and insulting to the source material these authors have been given. The frustrating lack of scale, of appreciation for the magnitude of the stakes at play and the players on hand, digs into the ridiculous space battles, the horribly unbelievable economies and governments, and the fact that all of these stories could have been so much more epic with just a faint appreciation of the arithmetic. You know those National Geographic shows that can put you on the edge of your seat over the magnificence of the world's oceans, or even a single portion of the Serengeti? Why does it always feel like you could just substitute some keywords and some textures and your average SW narrative could have unfolded in Boston downtown?

And oh, no, smaller, character based storylines aren't a bad thing at all. In fact, they perhaps more than anything would benefit from this, because when you make everything else seem so large and grand, it elevates their storylines, in this odd manner. It's ridiculous to expect all of the galactic victories to involve 1 on 1 swordfights; these individuals could do so much more, deal with so many awesome dynamics and epic things you could expect from an entire galaxy, but you never get it.

Alright I'm doing my HW now.

Sinious
I agree. These smaller characters and their fights would both inset a lot of new stories with a variety of concepts and help the fans appreciate the actual galactic events much more. Now fate of the galaxy is endangered weekly.

Freedon Nadd's story is a good example for this and some parts of the TCW too.

Tzeentch
Originally posted by Skybreaker
Given that the Star Wars mythos is set across a whole galaxy, colonized by quadrillions of sentient beings and filled with more planets, stars and moons than could ever be written about, does anybody feel that the vast majority of the SW literature fails to take advantage of the sheer scale of its mythos?
Most sci-fi/fantasy Universes have this problem.

Darth Abonis
Most of the galaxy is NOT settled. Therefore action takes place in certain areas. Also the galaxy is humancentric, so the actions of humans affect everyone.

Q99
Originally posted by Darth Abonis
Most of the galaxy is NOT settled. Therefore action takes place in certain areas. Also the galaxy is humancentric, so the actions of humans affect everyone.

A lot of it's not very settled, but even the stuff that is is way more than most authors really realize.



Really, most of the armies and such we see are too tiny to truly have any effect on the size of populations we're told is there.

Trocity
The fact that the Republic didn't have an army at all because they didn't think they would need one is kinda hilarious.

S_W_LeGenD
Originally posted by Q99
Really, most of the armies and such we see are too tiny to truly have any effect on the size of populations we're told is there.
Firepower matters much more then sheer numbers. However, I agree that the scale of activity and even military operations on the ground are massively understated and/or under-represented.

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.