Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Yes or no? Discuss.

Not unless it's being expressly used for something.

Yes, yes it can. Savage was sending ripples through the galaxy through his rage, but that doesn't mean he's suddenly a nexus.

That doesn't make Savage a focal point of the dark side, though.

I'd assume it does, since he's essentially pulling a Reborn Krayt.

That just means you could sense his rage, not that he was a focal point, or a concentration of Force energy.

No, this wasn't sensing rage, this was literally Savage sending ripples through the Force.

Well, that happens quite often. That doesn't necessarily mean he was a focal point. The way the Jedi Council spoke about it in TPM, it was a pretty rare thing in a person.

Sure.

Exar Kun and Sdiisous were and we know sentiments can't be nexuses themselves though they can cause them.

Individuals can be nexus'.

Um, no. Lol.

They can appear to be nexuses but they don't actually passively amp people around them.

And don't bother with the Vader quote I've already seen it.

Yes they do?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CLNkHNmWcAAaniQ.jpg

I already mentioned that individuals can seem to be nexuses and I was referring to the exact quote you posted as your second example. Regardless of if its an individual or place giving off a Darkside aura you wouldn't be able to tell unless you were actually under the effects of a nexus.

As for the first - Nexus: the central and most important point or place.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Yes they do?

No, they don't.

What the hell are you talking about, lmfao?

A passive amp shouldn't be expected because the full nexus is contained within the body. Passive amps are generally when a broad nexus, like a planet, amps an individual without them having to call upon the power since they are within the power. That being said, some individuals, like Revan, are so powerful that quotes have stated they passively amp those around them, presumably because their Force energy leaks and bleeds onto the environment.

Then they don't function like a normal nexus.

Quote?

No, it's just a nexus confined to a specific location (i.e. the body of a person). It's not different from nexus' locked between walls, etc.

"The Revan was here yesterday. It is a gift to be in the presence. I felt the Force - it travels below your skin, strait to the heart, lungs, the gut. A warmth and a chill."

It's different in that the person is sentient and that they don't just passively amp someone like a planet or nexus.

Was that a force user or a non force user? Because if it was a force user feeling his presence is nothing special.

Do you read what I type? They don't because the nexus is confined, not because the nexus is different. The temples on Yavin IV, which are nexus', also confine the dark side energies. Meaning if you are near it but not inside it, you aren't passively amped. Same applies for the body. There's no distinction.

Non-Force sensitive slave.

The point of the quote was that Revan passively amped a non-Force sensitive to the point where he could feel the Force. Note that non-Force sensitives otherwise can't feel the Force - to feel it is indication of an affinity for the Force.

I just reread our conversation. Are we actually even disagreeing here?

Like, I mean, I don't care how you interpret a Force user or what you call them. I'm just saying a Force user doesn't passively amp another being unless they will it.

Edit: Ninja'ed.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
The point of the quote was that Revan passively amped a non-Force sensitive to the point where he could feel the Force. Note that non-Force sensitives otherwise can't feel the Force - to feel it is indication of an affinity for the Force.

Who said Revan was doing it passively?

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Who said Revan was doing it passively?
The quote read that Revan's presence was the source of the sensation, not Revan's action.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
I'm just saying a Force user doesn't passively amp another being unless they will it.
Obviously not, based on the Revan quote.

It doesn't attribute it to his presence. It says he was there and then he felt it.

"It is a gift to be in the presence."

"It is a gift to be in the presence."

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Obviously not, based on the Revan quote.

But your claiming it does?! Or at least that's really what it looks like from this "Revan passively allows non force sensitives to feel his presence" stuff.

You're not making any sense to me.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
"It is a gift to be in the presence."

"It is a gift to be in the presence."

http://i.imgur.com/gjxLlLl.jpg

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
You're not making any sense to me.
Concession accepted.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
You're not making any sense to me.

I can't tell if you're agreeing with me or not anymore.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Concession accepted.

Did you just concede to yourself?

I'm fairly certain we've been over how quoting yourself works in another thread.

I'm fairly certain nobody's pompous enough to do that except for you.

Not sure why. I generally find other posts by me to be the most inspiring, enlightening, and deserving of being quoted.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
"It is a gift to be in the presence."

"It is a gift to be in the presence."

But in all seriousness. It notes that Revan's present in the area but it doesn't say that it's his presence causing it. I mean the quote itself from third person doesn't say that.

The slave guy is saying that but how the hell would he know. He's a non force sensitive slave.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Not sure why. I generally find other posts by me to be the most inspiring, enlightening, and deserving of being quoted.

Because your pompous and have a higher opinion of yourself then most people.

In legends, a crystal

Actually, yeah.