Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Given Maul's force feats aren't as developed as Vader or Dooku, and he's suffered losses to multiple padawans. Where would Maul rank with his only saving grace being skill with a lightsaber? Would he be a generic Sith berserker or with his limited technical acumen be able to serve in a tactical capacity? Where do you think based on feats Maul would rank in TOR?

Honestly: Saberswise around Arcann and the Outlander.

Canon Maul would be like Thana.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
Canon Maul would be like Thana.

In terms of saber combat he's above the Outlander, Arcann, ... While Force wise he's probably on Malgus/Arcann's level.

Hahaha.

You keep making these statements when its clear you're very uninformed about TOR era feats. It's amusing.

It's very clear that you overevaluate TOR and have little idea what Maul's actually capable of.

Well, I mean, he's certainly capable of much more than you'd expect from someone of his caliber... Like repeatedly falling off ledges.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Hahaha.

You keep making these statements when its clear you're very uninformed about TOR era feats. It's amusing.

I find with a side by side comparison of feats and accolades, Maul and the Wrath II are quite similar, well, pre-Rebels anyways.

So I'd say he would rank quite well.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
Canon Maul would be like Thana.
Ohshit.

Reasons?

Probably Wrath level.

Originally posted by carthage
he's suffered losses to multiple padawans.


Who are the these multiple Padawans who've beaten Maul that you guys keep billshitting about?

There was Obi-Wan, whose training was complete, and couldn't have won without Qui-Gon anyway and then there's.... Who again?

Ahsoka, Obi Wan, Ezra soon. Some people count Kanan not realizing he was officially knighted the episode beforehand.

People still can't distinguish canon and legends lmfao.

And where did you draw that conclusion from?

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Ahsoka, Obi Wan, Ezra soon. Some people count Kanan not realizing he was officially knighted the episode beforehand.


Ahsoka never beat him in a fight. What's this "Ezra soon" nonsense?

Yes Kanan was Knighted. Those people shouldn't be making shit up.

So yeah, no one except Obi-Wan whose training was complete, and who could never have fought/defeated Maul on his own anyway


And you know, if we want to go there (as in full retard mode of debating) then technically Vader also got defeated by a Padawan.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Ahsoka never beat him in a fight. What's this "Ezra soon" nonsense?

A preview showed Ezra kicking Mauls ass.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Probably Wrath level.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Probably Wrath level.

He'd beat him in a fight tho.

Originally posted by Nephthys
A preview showed Ezra kicking Mauls ass.


Lol No, it showed him Kicking Maul.


At least wait for the episode before making things up.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
He'd beat him in a fight tho.
Yup. He is at least as skilled, may a bit more powerful and has better physicals

Just above the Wrath, I'd imagine.

Originally posted by Nephthys
A preview showed Ezra kicking Mauls ass. Context the episode has not aired yet you troll.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Context the episode has not aired yet you troll.
Where would you rank Maul in the TOR era, Quan?

Originally posted by Ursumeles
Where would you rank Maul in the TOR era, Quan?

Canon only.

Wha has the Wrath done to be considered close to Maul?

Defeating skilled Padawans..

Around the Wrath, yeah.

The trolling can stop now Beni, it isn't funny anymore.

Of course it is.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
The trolling can stop now Beni, it isn't funny anymore. It was never funny and it denotes he's incredibly insecure when it comes to Maul.

Yeah, the "he loses to Padawans" argument is quite old and well not true since there were obviously circumstances involved.

Whether there were circumstances it's still true, phag.

Sure but it isn't usable in battle threads in which those circumstances don't apply.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
Reasons?

To explain further, I see a similarity between the Wrath and Maul on a basis of accolades and feats.

Maul has his "one of the most deadly warriors in Sith history" accolade, and his variety of other accolades denoting his power and training. Maul has no issue army busting, evident in his dismantling of Black Sun, and has taken down esteemed masters of the Jedi Order like Anoon Bondara and Qui Gon Jinn. Stomping the likes of Komari Vosa isn't bad either.

On the other side of the coin, the Wrath had "unrivaled strength in battle" before arriving at the Korriban Academy, and he was deemed one of, if not the, strongest acolytes there and the end of his trials. The Wrath is described to be strong in the Force and the dark side by numerous characters throughout the story, and it is stated in the codex that he was chosen out of millions of candidates to become the Emperor's Wrath, which while this may not be entirely based on his power, is still logically decided with power as a factor.

The Wrath has his own feats of army busting, like:
*Killing General Rylon's elite soldiers in the Arms factory on Balmorra
*Slaughtering his way through House Organa's defenses
*Cutting swathes through the Republic's finest on his quest to kill the war trust generals
*Killing the Gormak Chiefs on Voss

And the Wrath has his own set impressive kills against both jedi and sith, like:
*Single-handedly killing Masters Yonlach and Yul-Li
*Defeating Nomen Karr multiple times, and then effectively stomping Jaesa
*Killing Xerender and Wylett
*Killing 2 Dark Council members (with assistance, however meager), Vengean and Ekkege
* Killing Baras
*Killing the Sel-Makor possessed Emperor's Voice

They're also both combatants who specialize more in sabers than in force, but are still strong telekinetics. So Wrath level isn't bad at all I would say.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It was never funny and it denotes he's incredibly insecure when it comes to Maul. Maul is one of my preferred characters, but trolling members will always be amusing.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Maul is one of my preferred characters, but trolling members will always be amusing. So you admit you aren't being serious.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Maul is one of my preferred characters, but trolling members will always be amusing.

Which is funny if it wouldn't be that certain members take it seriously and even follow you

Some do take it seriously, but not in the way you think.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
Which is funny if it wouldn't be that certain members take it seriously and even follow you It is the lemmings and the weak which March to the beat of someone else's drum who is trolling. The Carthages of the internet but they also aren't taken seriously nor can they make a compelling argument.

why does anybody have a problem with carthage

Originally posted by JKBart
why does anybody have a problem with carthage He is just a joke. He's a harmless, irrelevant zero floating through the universe not having an impact on anything.

Carthage is the best user here

No u r, Bart.
Ily