Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

So as a few know, I tend to have quite a few obscure...like very obscure sources pertaining to the SWU in the form of Sourcebooks/Novels etc. These sources sometimes get used for debates and for some reason...some people either just ignore it or just say it's unusable because it's obscure.

I never really felt that made much sense because....just because many people don't know about it, it should just be discarded? So because people don't read a whole lot you can disregard a whole bunch of sources?

So by that logic, can I disregard a bunch of post-ROTJ novels and comics because these would be obscure sources to me because I haven't read them?

If there's no contradiction, I'm not seeing why using obscure sources are a bad thing. If anything else, it actually helps with certain things that normally would be speculated on or otherwise.

So....obscure sources are bad? What do y'all think?

I don't get what you mean with "obscure surces" tbh.

Originally posted by Ursumeles
I don't get what you mean with "obscure surces" tbh.

Sourcebooks/comics/novels and the like, that aren't as well known or quoted from or scanned from.

Ah, okay.
I see no issue with using them, as long as they don't say shiat like Bastila ~ Tyranus ~ Kenobi.

Originally posted by Ursumeles
I see no issue with using them, as ling as they don't say shiat like Bastila ~ Tyranus ~ Kenobi.

if they don't agree with my opion they are vrry bad.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
if they don't agree with my opion they are vrry bad.

Who complains about obscure sources?

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
Who complains about obscure sources?

Ok I wouldn't say complaining, I've just seen some commentary where they don't really like those sources being used because they haven't been noted elsewhere in more well known sources.

It's not a real big thing, I just wanted to check with everyone if using such sources is a bad thing or not with everyone.