Homophobic? Is Homophobia In The Bible?

Adam_PoE

Originally posted by Emperordmb
While I fundamentally disagree with you that homosexuality is immoral, I do agree that calling it a phobia, in much the same way that the term Islamaphobia is a complete misnomer.

Do you know the difference between a modifier and a noun?

Phobia, the noun, refers to a clinical anxiety disorder, characterized by a persistent fear of an object or situation.

Phobia, the modifier, refers to an irrational aversion or prejudice toward the noun being modified.

The same word, when used differently, means different things.

Imagine that.

riv6672

Fix your sig, Jesus.

Robtard

Homophobic? Is Homophobia In The Bible?

One things that's definitely in the Bible, incestuous homosexual rape.

Genesis: 9:20-25 (KJV)

20 And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard:

21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent.

22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.

23 And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father's nakedness.

24 And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.

25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.

26 And he said, Blessed be the Lord God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.

Ham raped his father Noah while Noah was passed out from binge-drinking wine; told his two brothers about it who then covered their drunken father's naked raped body and Noah became so enraged after he woke and discovered his sore butthole that he cursed Ham's son Canaan (his own grandson) who went on to be the founder of the Canaanites, the long standing mortal and often subjugated enemies of the Israelites. Crazy shit.

Another theory is that Ham raped his mother while Noah drunken ass was soring. But really, read the Bible line per line, Ham buttraped his own father.

Adam Grimes

I summon ennin to fight his Christian counterpart

ArtificialGlory

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Do you know the difference between a modifier and a noun?

Phobia, the noun, refers to a clinical anxiety disorder, characterized by a persistent fear of an object or situation.

Phobia, the modifier, refers to an irrational aversion or prejudice toward the noun being modified.

The same word, when used differently, means different things.

Imagine that.
Am I missing something here, but the terms 'arachnophobia' and 'homophobia', for example, describe two rather different feelings.

JesusLovesYou

Originally posted by Surtur
Why are you framing it as if it's a bad thing to disagree with a psychopath?

Why do you accuse God of being that?

JesusLovesYou

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Do you know the difference between a modifier and a noun?

Phobia, the noun, refers to a clinical anxiety disorder, characterized by a persistent fear of an object or situation.

Phobia, the modifier, refers to an irrational aversion or prejudice toward the noun being modified.

The same word, when used differently, means different things.

Imagine that.

My understanding of modifiers is that adjectives modify nouns, and adverbs modify verbs.

Homophobia is a noun. Homophobic is an adjective.

This does not change anything that I wrote at the outset of this thread concerning prefixes and suffixes.

riv6672

Sig. Fix the sig, Jesus.

JesusLovesYou

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Am I missing something here, but the terms 'arachnophobia' and 'homophobia', for example, describe two rather different feelings.

No they don't.

They both denote fear.

Adam_PoE

Originally posted by Robtard
Homophobic? Is Homophobia In The Bible?

One things that's definitely in the Bible, incestuous homosexual rape.

. . . Ham raped his father Noah while Noah was passed out from binge-drinking wine; told his two brothers about it who then covered their drunken father's naked raped body and Noah became so enraged after he woke and discovered his sore butthole that he cursed Ham's son Canaan (his own grandson) who went on to be the founder of the Canaanites, the long standing mortal and often subjugated enemies of the Israelites. Crazy shit.

Another theory is that Ham raped his mother while Noah drunken ass was soring. But really, read the Bible line per line, Ham buttraped his own father.

That can be it, because God loves rape.

http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e384/super_hottie_2/mary.jpg

http://www.awkwardmomentsbible.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/AwkwardMomentsBible_NotTheAngels.jpg

https://i1.wp.com/mindsoap.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/mindsoap-lot-raped-by-daughters.jpg

ArtificialGlory

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
No they don't.

They both denote fear.
Not quite. One describes irrational fear and even panic, the other describes hatred, suspicion and bigotry.

riv6672

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
No they don't.

They both denote fear.
Your sig denotes incompetence.
Fix it, its so distracting.

JesusLovesYou

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Not quite. One describes irrational fear and even panic, the other describes hatred, suspicion and bigotry.

No, they both denote fear.

Do you understand what a suffix is?

ArtificialGlory

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
No, they both denote fear.

Do you understand what a suffix is?
Do you understand that the meaning of words can change depending on context? Show an arachnaphobe a spider and show a homophobe a gay person and you'll get two very different reactions.

Surtur

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Why do you accuse God of being that?

He displays psychopathic tendencies in combination with some epic levels of narcissism.

You didn't answer my other question. If God commanded you to have sex with a man, would you?

Surtur

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Do you understand that the meaning of words can change depending on context? Show an arachnaphobe a spider and show a homophobe a gay person and you'll get two very different reactions.

Or what if it was a gay spider?!?!

ArtificialGlory

That is simply not true. The suffix -phobia takes on a different meaning when applied to societal issues such homophobia, xenophobia, Islamophobia, etc.

'Homophobia', if taken literally, would mean 'fear of the same' which is basically nonsensical.

Adam_PoE

https://media.tenor.com/images/b135ee92057e85f5e78741446c6baf85/tenor.gif

FinalAnswer

Leviticus also forbids eating shellfish and pork, trimming your beard, and wearing mixed fabrics, but I'm sure you adhere to these strict guidelines to a fault as well.

Surtur

"You shall not lie with a male as a woman". In modern times you might interpret that as not lying with a male who is pretending to be a woman.

JesusLovesYou

Originally posted by Surtur
"You shall not lie with a male as a woman". In modern times you might interpret that as not lying with a male who is pretending to be a woman.

All homosexual relationships are an abomination to God.

Stealth Moose

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
I summon ennin to fight his Christian counterpart

Both are obtuse blocks of religious text, so yeah, go for it.

Stealth Moose

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
All homosexual relationships are an abomination to God.

Actually, biblical verses only explicitly frown upon male homosexuality. God is apparently big on girl-on-girl.

Surtur

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
All homosexual relationships are an abomination to God.

Wouldn't he have created a species that is just incapable of homosexual behavior then?

Before you return with comments abut free will, if the guy loved free will so much he wouldn't insist that we worship him and only him.

Surtur

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Actually, biblical verses only explicitly frown upon male homosexuality. God is apparently big on girl-on-girl.

Psshh, friggin sexist. What a rare instance of God not being fair.

Stealth Moose

Originally posted by Surtur
Psshh, friggin sexist. What a rare instance of God not being fair.

OT God is not fair or reasonable or even remotely likable. But he could whimsically destroy your race because of a bad day, so you worshipped him out of fear.

If OT God was in a fantasy series, he would be the ultimate evil people would band together to overcome.

JesusLovesYou

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
OT God is not fair or reasonable or even remotely likable. But he could whimsically destroy your race because of a bad day, so you worshipped him out of fear.

If OT God was in a fantasy series, he would be the ultimate evil people would band together to overcome.

I responded to your last post to me in the Can ANYONE Go To Heaven? thread.

You can go there to find it, or click on the link below:

Click https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WbWxQoF-OXX3OGfZkuJ8HKjPNzBMjtU62Ak8uputjuU/edit

ArtificialGlory

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
I responded to your last post to me in the Can ANYONE Go To Heaven? thread.

You can go there to find it, or click on the link below:

Click https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WbWxQoF-OXX3OGfZkuJ8HKjPNzBMjtU62Ak8uputjuU/edit
Dude, that's 32 pages long. Do you really think anyone will read that?

Patient_Leech

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Dude, that's 32 pages long. Do you really think anyone will read that?

laughing out loud

C'mon... who doesn't want to read 32 pages of JesusLovesYou writing?

If you loved God you would do it! mad

JesusLovesYou

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Dude, that's 32 pages long. Do you really think anyone will read that?

My response to Stealth Moose's last post to me in the Can ANYONE Go To Heaven? thread is not really 32 pages.

I use a lot of space.

Stealth Moose, you can go there to the above thread to find it, or click on the link below:

Click https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WbWxQoF-OXX3OGfZkuJ8HKjPNzBMjtU62Ak8uputjuU/edit

JesusLovesYou

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Actually, biblical verses only explicitly frown upon male homosexuality. God is apparently big on girl-on-girl.

Chapter and verse supporting your assertion.

I can cite chapter and verse refuting your claim.

Romans 1:26-27

For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature.

The Bible says that even women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature.

Women had "exchanged" the "natural use" for what is "against nature". They were exchanging their bodies sexually with same gender and animals.

Women were doing things sexually with their bodies (most likely homosexuality and bestiality) that is "against nature". The Bible calls their perverted sexual desires vile passions.

So, no, God does "not" approve of, nor condone female homosexual relationships/encounters either.

riv6672

Still havent fixd that sig? Good LORD (no pun intended)!

Patient_Leech

What is wrong with the sig that you can't seem to let go of?

(I mean, besides the fact that it's Christian propaganda)

riv6672

Well, at first it was a broken image. Now its a broken link.

I've no problem with the working pic itself, or its message.
I dont mind religion. I mind ppl who use it to troll internet message boards.

Jmanghan

In the bible it says something along the lines of "A man shall not lay with another man, it is an abomination".

bluewaterrider

Originally posted by riv6672
Well, at first it was a broken image. Now its a broken link.

I've no problem with the working pic itself, or its message.
I dont mind religion. I mind ppl who use it to troll internet message boards.

confused

What makes you think this person is a troll?

What exactly have you seen, or what do you think you're seeing, that would mark him or her as such, given how willingly and seriously he or she discusses topics with other posters so far?

Patient_Leech

Originally posted by riv6672
Starting multiple threads pushing those views is trolling.

I tend to agree.

Stealth Moose

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Chapter and verse supporting your assertion.

I can cite chapter and verse refuting your claim.

Romans 1:26-27

For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature.

The Bible says that even women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature.

Women had "exchanged" the "natural use" for what is "against nature". They were exchanging their bodies sexually with same gender and animals.

Women were doing things sexually with their bodies (most likely homosexuality and bestiality) that is "against nature". The Bible calls their perverted sexual desires vile passions.

So, no, God does "not" approve of, nor condone female homosexual relationships/encounters either.

1. Leviticus is the old Testament source of most homosexuality hating justification, and it quite clearly only refers to men. Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13.

2. New Testament references to male homosexuality include 1 Corinthians 6:9 (which lumps in things like fornicators into the same group of undesirables), 1 Timothy 1:10, and Romans 1:26-27.

3. Only the last one refers to women. And pretty much all of the references to anti-homosexuality in the NT come from the works of Paul, not from the words of Jesus, and not from the words of God.

So you can conclude that Paul hates sex.

Point, you.

http://replygif.net/i/595.gif

Stealth Moose

EDIT

Patient_Leech

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
...And pretty much all of the references to anti-homosexuality in the NT come from the works of Paul, not from the words of Jesus, and not from the words of God.

So you can conclude that Paul hates sex.

Excuse me... Mr. Moose. You know God was speaking thru Paul, right?

Therefore God hates **** and sex. cool

*Drops mic*

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/44/3d/b1/443db1181f154ac61d6b78833a452fc8--corduroy-skirt-protest-signs.jpg

Adam_PoE

http://data.whicdn.com/images/128839955/original.gif

Stealth Moose

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Excuse me... Mr. Moose. You know God was speaking thru Paul, right?

Therefore God hates **** and sex. cool

*Drops mic*

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/44/3d/b1/443db1181f154ac61d6b78833a452fc8--corduroy-skirt-protest-signs.jpg

http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/wosht.gif

JesusLovesYou

Originally posted by Robtard
You think seeing one's father naked is such a blasphemy that one's child and then bloodline is cursed? LoLz. You probably do. But really, Ham buttraped his drunkard of a father, probably as revenge for forcing him to go on what likely was a god-awful boat ride.

Error's? That was a direct copy/paste from King James' own bible, you heathen.

Who's child was cursed? Who's bloodline was cursed?

JesusLovesYou

Originally posted by Jmanghan
In the bible it says something along the lines of "A man shall not lay with another man, it is an abomination".

Here it is:

Leviticus 18:22

You shall not lie with man, as with woman. It is an abomination.

Stealth Moose

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Who's child was cursed? Who's bloodline was cursed?

Primo Bible scholar here doesn't know the Hametic thesis.

JesusLovesYou

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Primo Bible scholar here doesn't know the Hametic thesis.

Many times when I spot an error in someone's statement I'll ask a question (that I already know the answer to), to get that person to catch their own mistake.

MythLord

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou

Leviticus 18:22

You shall not lie with man, as with woman. It is an abomination.

Y'know, you could actually attempt to counter my post as oppose to ignoring factual evidence debunking your moronic claims, as oppose to quoting "holy" scripture over and over with no solid basis.

MythLord

Originally posted by MythLord
Y'know, you could actually attempt to counter our posts as oppose to ignoring factual evidence debunking your moronic claims and quoting "holy" scripture over and over with no solid basis.

JesusLovesYou

Bad link at the end of my previous post in this thread just two up from this one. reading

Here's a good link:

Click https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OY4mq5kM2ADcBlVn4A0SgoDoB5MfT8_iyqq5DMaTfFo/edit

MythLord

God, I love how when blood-sucking Christians have their "proof" debunked, they just kinda decide to ignore it.

Adam_PoE

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Bad link at the end of my previous post in this thread just two up from this one. reading

Here's a good link:

Click https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OY4mq5kM2ADcBlVn4A0SgoDoB5MfT8_iyqq5DMaTfFo/edit

https://media.giphy.com/media/BHgaANDRnPtS0/giphy.gif

Stealth Moose

Originally posted by MythLord
God, I love how when blood-sucking Christians have their "proof" debunked, they just kinda decide to ignore it.

Myopic confirmation bias is a common trait for them.

I like how homosexuals are a bigger problem than slavery, genocide, global flooding, God making bets on peoples' lives with Satan, and concubines.

Remember, without the Bible, you're living in sin.

MythLord

Yeah... torturing people, treating people like objects and the biggest source of good allowing the biggest source of evil to kill innocents is clearly a far better alternative than... two dudes kissing.

JesusLovesYou

Corrected:

Click https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h2S9c89zBjaA2NwWmyVyF3NzMIm9v2hLE01qPFRN-pQ/edit

MythLord

Oh good he responded...

That's moronic. I'm satan because I think Leviticus is a stupid book? Of course it is and it's not the Word of God, it's the word of some jerkoff in a cave who thinks he can condemn anyone he chooses. If Leviticus is truly the Word of God, then it conflicts with half the Bible and it condemns literally all human beings to hell. WOW, my Lord sure does love me if me literally breathing can lead to burning in hell for eternity.

Your source is a biased one made up by the same blood-sucking Christians as you. Doing a bit of research beyond just the shallow surface to support your end would lead you to see that historians, as well as several theologists actually confirm the terms in Corinthians are not referring to homosexuality. Now sure the first few sins listed are lust-related, but then the sin listed after malakos is theft, greed, so it's clearly not sex-exclusive.

Look it up, mate. It's ultimately referring to a slave-owner cheating on his family by laying with a boy(an underaged slave). I looked it up and I've talked to a few people who know the Bible by heart and they agree about that context.

You done with your ramblings, sweetheart? Good. Lemme explain something to you:
I don't hate you. I don't hate any human being, really. It's not in my nature to hate. It is, however, in my nature to expose -- what was the term you used? -- vipers, such as yourself.
You see: you preach the Bible like it's the actual "Word of God"(it isn't) while ignoring the fundamental realities of your own religion. What you offer is not a solution, but rather an existential-crisis-evasion. "Don't look over there, look over here; Don't listen to that, listen to this" And of course you shut your eyes and place your hands over your ears when your limited view of reality is challenged.

You can claim I'm not a Christian because I don't take every single word from an outdated book seriously, I don't mind. You can claim I'm a false prophet, satan, wolf in sheep's clothing(ironically, my name, when translated, actually does mean wolf) and I won't mind. But that won't change anything. My post does nothing to defame Christ, or God or every Christian. My post doesn't knock "the Word of God" a few pegs... My post knocks you down. You and your close-minded beliefs about how you got all of reality figured out by clinging to minsterpretations of old texts.

The rest of your post is a pointless mess and you're attempting to refute well-known scientific facts with biased sources designed to spread propaganda. Also, it's a nitpick but I wasn't born homosexual, I was born bisexual. Big difference. thumb up

MythLord

Also, for the love of Christ, can you please organise your posts better? It's really easy to not have to spread out a poor-formatted three-post long rant which ultimately amounts to 4 sentences repeating themselves over and over.

Try and do that.

Robtard

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Who's child was cursed? Who's bloodline was cursed?

"One's child" would be a reference to Ham's son Canaan, proginator of the Canaanites, hated and subjugated foe of the Israelites. Seriously, how do you not know these basics?

ps You're welcome

JesusLovesYou

Originally posted by Robtard
"One's child" would be a reference to Ham's son Canaan, proginator of the Canaanites, hated and subjugated foe of the Israelites. Seriously, how do you not know these basics?

ps You're welcome

I did know.

I was checking to see if you knew.

JesusLovesYou

Corrected:

Click https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Kc-yBZYlHHR8E4TG1jBB0YSa5gZh8JpYssvgdqfjYkA/edit

ArtificialGlory

Well, now that you have conclusively proven that MythLord is devil-spawn, should we burn him at the stake? Hang him? Or stone him, perhaps?

JesusLovesYou

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Well, now that you have conclusively proven that MythLord is devil-spawn, should we burn him at the stake? Hang him? Or stone him, perhaps?

I thought I was talking to a woman.

No, true believers/followers of Christ Jesus pray for people who are in darkness, which is what I did.

ArtificialGlory

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
I thought I was talking to a woman.

No, true believers/followers of Christ Jesus pray for people who are in darkness, which is what I did.
It says 'male' under his avatar.

But why let him poison the minds of others? Just burn him and let God judge his soul.

JesusLovesYou

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
It says 'male' under his avatar.

But why let him poison the minds of others? Just burn him and let God judge his soul.

You do not know what manner of spirit believers are of.

You see, that's not God's will.

God is Love, so He's not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance.

God loves him. And in a Christian way I do too.

ArtificialGlory

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
You do not know what manner of spirit believers are of.

You see, that's not God's will.

God is Love, so He's not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance.

God loves him. And in a Christian way I do too.
But the Bible is clear on this matter: people like him should be dealt with.

MythLord

I love how his arguments aren't actual substantiated evidence, but rather "YOU ARE THE DEVIL SPAWN!"

This is freakin' hilarious. laughing

I legitimately laughed for several minutes at "U r devils son! Ur name is ADOLF! U h8 us!". Just noting a nonsensical book is nonsensical and his arguments are flawed, that means I hate him.
The idea that all Christians should be this emotionless Hive-Mind meant to treat every word in the Bible as universal law is hilarious. laughing out loud

bluewaterrider

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou

I thought I was talking to a woman.

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory

It says 'male' under avatar.

We live in a world now where the daughter of Sonny and Cher Bono calls herself "Chaz" and the media refers to her as a man, while father and former Olympian Bruce Jenner calls himself "Caitlyn" and dresses in women's clothes and Wikipedia officially refers to him as "her".

This is an age where segments of the population are trying their level best to get us to accept select lies as reality, AG. I'm hard-pressed to fault anyone who mistrusts or even ignores the gender tags posted by young people raised in our current environment.

MythLord

I'm not a tranny, lol. And even if I was, how would JesusLovesYou know? Did his all-seeing eye that told him that Lucifer's my dad also tell him I'm a cross-dresser?

ArtificialGlory

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
We live in a world now where the daughter of Sonny and Cher Bono calls herself "Chaz" and the media refers to her as a man, while father and former Olympian Bruce Jenner calls himself "Caitlyn" and dresses in women's clothes and Wikipedia officially refers to him as "her".

This is an age where segments of the population are trying their level best to get us to accept select lies as reality, AG. I'm hard-pressed to fault anyone who mistrusts or even ignores the gender tags posted by young people raised in our current environment.
Such people are a tiny minority so I think I'll take my chances.

MythLord

AG, do you think I'm a Satanist?

MythLord

No, he does not apparently.

Never said I hated the guy, lol. I called out his arguments for being moronic, which they are.

Given at the time a French man was my avatar, that was meant as a joke. I'm not actually near France, nor am I German.

I used "herr" as an onomatopoeia -_-

That's nice. But no, I'm not from Germany and my name is not Adolf. laughing out loud

Ursumeles

1. Myth isn't from germany.
2. His name isn't Adolf.
3. Adolf is just a name. It was once very common in Germany.
4. Wulf is pro-gay. Nazi's were against them.
Hitler was a Christian

Patient_Leech

Originally posted by Ursumeles
Hitler was a Christian

And it was great inspiration for persecuting and murdering the Jews seeing as those pesky Jews killed Christ.

Surtur

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
And it was great inspiration for persecuting and murdering the Jews seeing as those pesky Jews killed Christ.

The problem with the Hitler thing is that there is a difference between a dictator who is doing horrible things in the name of a religion and a dictator who does horrible things and just happens to not be an atheist.

Hitler believed some wacky shit, but above all the nazis thought they were just plain better than everyone, especially the Jews. I don't think God entered much into it. It was more about how awesome the German race was. I also honestly don't think Hitler wanted anyone worshiping or revering something more than they did him.

Also the truth is we inspired Hitler too. When I say "we" I mean the USA. The way we treated people, segregated them. He saw it and thought it was good, but that it just didn't go far enough. He decided to take it further. Another thing that inspired him was WW1 and how it ended, he ended up blaming the Jews(Hitler went to prison for an attempted coup).

ArtificialGlory

Originally posted by MythLord
AG, do you think I'm a Satanist?
No.

Surtur

Modern Satanists do not even worship Satan nor do they even think he is real. So it's not necessarily a bad thing.

MythLord

Apparently I do for... thinking Leviticus is a stupid book.

JesusLovesYou

Originally posted by Ursumeles
1. Myth isn't from germany.
2. His name isn't Adolf.
3. Adolf is just a name. It was once very common in Germany.
4. Wulf is pro-gay. Nazi's were against them.
Hitler was a Christian

I didn't say his name was Adolf.

He said that his name when translated means "wolf". The name "Adolf" means "noble wolf". That's why I asked him if his name was Adolf.

MythLord

Can we not discuss my name, please?

Surtur

Originally posted by MythLord
Can we not discuss my name, please?

He wants your True Name. There is magic in it. Beware.

Robtard

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
I did know.

I was checking to see if you knew.

It's obvious I knew, as I said it.

It's obvious you didn't, because you had to ask.

MythLord

Originally posted by Surtur
He wants your True Name. There is magic in it. Beware.

My true name is actually very similar to that of a certain actor. It's Badweash Cumbwerpach.

JesusLovesYou

Originally posted by Robtard
It's obvious I knew, as I said it.

It's obvious you didn't, because you had to ask.

Really?

Is that why it took you 4 days to research--uh hem, I mean-- answer?

Like I said, I did know, I was waiting to see what you would say so that I could correct you.

Adam_PoE

https://media.giphy.com/media/38fblIIrHLMPe/giphy.gif

Surtur

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Really?

Is that why it took you 4 days to research--uh hem, I mean-- answer?

To be fair, it took an omnipotent deity 6 days to create everything.

Robtard

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Really?

Is that why it took you 4 days to research--uh hem, I mean-- answer?

Like I said, I did know, I was waiting to see what you would say so that I could correct you.

Factually.

Your post implies that the answer wasn't already given in my first post and there was something that needed correction, when it was and nothing needs correction. Anyone who knows bible-basics would have understood what I said and that I was speaking from Ham's perspective, you clearly don't; why you didn't.

Go back and look, you will understand now that you've been informed. You're welcome again.