Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

For real!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/05/27/trump-twitter-label/

yup, i posted about it in the trump thread.

he falsely claimed to have his first ammendment rights threatened, while threatening the fist ammendment rights of twitter (which now has the same constitutional rights as citizens do, thanks to conservatives, ironically)

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
yup, i posted about it in the trump thread.

he falsely claimed to have his first ammendment rights threatened, while threatening the fist ammendment rights of twitter (which now has the same constitutional rights as citizens do, thanks to conservatives, ironically) Does DDM need this done to his posts?

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
For real!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/05/27/trump-twitter-label/


Babyman-in-chief strikes again, how dare someone fact-check his lies and inane commentary

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Does DDM need this done to his posts?



https://i.imgur.com/sXzyshN.jpgGet the facts about the Arbery murder case

https://i.imgur.com/sXzyshN.jpgGet the facts about what Brie Larson actually said.

99% of Blaze and Dailywire articles described perfectly. 👍

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Top Notch

Just pointing out that, by bashs own definition, you're cheer leading

Originally posted by Surtur
Just pointing out that, by bashs own definition, you're cheer leading I'm appreciating a humorous quip. I would have laughed if Broly did similar.

Hey I didn't create the definition

surt's personally offended because the blaze is his holy scripture

oh did you change the definition of cheer leading now?

Can we put a moratorium on that word for 7 days.

“Both sides”

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Can we put a moratorium on that word for 7 days.

“Both sides”

I just wanna be clear on the definition

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Can we put a moratorium on that word for 7 days.

“Both sides” More than happy too.

your bargaining skills are weak old man.


2 days

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
99% of Blaze and Dailywire articles described perfectly. 👍
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
surt's personally offended because the blaze is his holy scripture

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
your bargaining skills are weak old man.


2 days I'm ever practising satyagrahi.

Originally posted by Robtard
Bash is on fire tonight Rob durpunk

I noticed by measuring the eTears of his "fans"...

Originally posted by Robtard
I noticed by measuring the eTears of his "fans"... we need a rain gauge for that, I say at least 8 inches

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
we need a rain gauge for that, I say at least 8 inches

Who is eight-inches?

Trump keeps giving me more reasons to not help his re-election. Banning free speech is against our constitution. Take the media with a grain of salt. It's money driven, but necessary.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Who is eight-inches? was waiting for you to add that

Originally posted by meep-meep
Trump keeps giving me more reasons to not help his re-election. Banning free speech is against our constitution. Take the media with a grain of salt. It's money driven, but necessary.






People on the right confuse Trump for being conservative. He's not conservative.

He's Pro-Trump which means he takes whatever position is - as he perceives it - best for Trump.

Originally posted by dadudemon




People on the right confuse Trump for being conservative. He's not conservative.

He's Pro-Trump which means he takes whatever position is - as he perceives it - best for Trump.


I know of no one on the right who thinks Trump is actually truly a conservative; most of us understand that he's a populist. He is at least on the right though, thankfully. If anything, it's ignorant leftists who think he's conservative. In their tiny, delusional minds, if you don't agree with every crazy, Marxist political view of theirs then you must be one of dem "racist" conservatives!

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
For real!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/05/27/trump-twitter-label/

Is this going to bring up the question of whether Twitter is a platform or a publisher by having the editorial capacity to bring up fact checks on posts?

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I know of no one on the right who thinks Trump is actually truly a conservative; most of us understand that he's a populist. He is at least on the right though, thankfully. If anything, it's ignorant leftists who think he's conservative. In their tiny, delusional minds, if you don't agree with every crazy, Marxist political view of theirs then you must be one of dem "racist" conservatives! durwank

Originally posted by snowdragon
Is this going to bring up the question of whether Twitter is a platform or a publisher by having the editorial capacity to bring up fact checks on posts? it's a platform in my opinion, with the right to edit content independently posted on it that does not fit the platforms ethical compass.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
was waiting for you to add that

My guess is Robtard.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
My guess is Robtard. It's certainly possible.

Seems Bash was correct and babyman-in-chief is going to try and restrict Twitter/social media because they fact-checked him:

Legal and tech policy experts say Trump's executive order draft cracking down on social media companies is dead on arrival


Though I also believes it's a ploy to distract away that 100K+ Americans have now died of covid-19 under Trump's watch.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
It's certainly possible.

I would say it is probable. I would bet at least 7.5 and real thick and rigid.

A bit over 7, maybe 7.5 on a good day.

How'd you know?

Originally posted by Robtard
Seems Bash was correct and babyman-in-chief is going to try and restrict Twitter/social media because they fact-checked him:

and how can this be? for i am the kwisatz haderach!

That's the name of my Wifi

cool! what's your password?

Yourmoms@ss112

keeps saying "incorrect password"

...HEY WAIT A MINUTE!

Let's guess Robs password

Fearisthemindkiller1111

fillmyass69

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
fillmyass69 top notch!

I think this is stupid.

Especially because if Trump went to another social media platform he'd probably be followed by his millions of twitter followers too.

And then people would target that as well.

Originally posted by Robtard
A bit over 7, maybe 7.5 on a good day.

How'd you know?

Experience. I can usually tell just but looking at a guy.

Though I am chuckling at lefties pretending they give a shit about free speech.

Originally posted by Surtur
Though I am chuckling at lefties pretending they give a shit about free speech.

you don't even understand the concept of freedom of speech, much like your hero trump; but he's about to learn. hopefully you will learn as well

Originally posted by Surtur
I think this is stupid.

Especially because if Trump went to another social media platform he'd probably be followed by his millions of twitter followers too.

And then people would target that as well.

No they wouldn't. If Trump moved over, it would cost Twitter a huge chunk of money. The new platform would become super super valuable. And the new "twitter" would maintain their policies of non-fake-news and not messing with content.


Every provider has a due care responsibility to remove illegal content. But editorializing content? That's a pretty bad idea.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you don't even understand the concept of freedom of speech, much like your hero trump; but he's about to learn. hopefully you will learn as well

Sure I do kiddo. But you tried.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Alternative take: Twitter is systematically targeting Trump with fake news and misleading "science" in an attempt to influence US politics and undermine the lawfully elected PotUS. Because Twitter has a clear agenda.

I just want this "correction" shit they are doing to be applied equally.

There is a problem if any leftist on twitter is allowed to post misleading info without any action being taken.

Or again as I said in the other thread: they should just be transparent. Admit the bias. Do not gas light.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Experience. I can usually tell just but looking at a guy.

https://media.giphy.com/media/nlWGe7Q64zwQ0/200_d.gif

As long as they are consistent with the practice I have no issues.

Out of curiosity, who here feels they will be consistent with this?

Originally posted by Robtard
https://media.giphy.com/media/nlWGe7Q64zwQ0/200_d.gif

Your size is 1 in 155,000. That is pretty impressive.

Originally posted by Robtard
Exactly, Trump's post was not altered or censored in any fashion. His followers are free to read it just as he wrote it.

even if they deleted it, and even if they deleted Trump's account, it's within their rights. oh well, let's watch the great unraveling and humiliation of donald trump, with much laughter

Originally posted by Surtur
I just want this "correction" shit they are doing to be applied equally.


I don't. I don't want any clarifications or labels added to anyone's posts. That's editorializing. Leave that shit for news outlets and not humans and AI on social media platforms.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I don't. I don't want any clarifications or labels added to anyone's posts. That's editorializing. Leave that shit for news outlets and not humans and AI on social media platforms.

I agree, but if they're gonna do it at least be consistent.

Facts are not opinions. Fact-checking is not editorializing.

Originally posted by Surtur
Out of curiosity, who here feels they will be consistent with this?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Facts are not opinions. Fact-checking is not editorializing.

So all the news organization who said there was Russian collusion, tell me about how those fact worked out for you.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So all the news organization who said there was Russian collusion, tell me about how those fact worked out for you.

And democrats got pissed and went after Facebook for Russian stuff.

They cried about them allowing any political ad too.

But now they wanna gas light us as if they give two shits about freedom of speech or the rights of private companies. Bullshit.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So all the news organization who said there was Russian collusion, tell me about how those fact worked out for you. The truth will come out when Trump has gone.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Facts are not opinions. Fact-checking is not editorializing.

In this particular case, wrong and wrong.

Also, almost all fact checkers editorialize and bring two heaping scoops of bias.

Fact-checking is definitely editorializing.



If you were correct, a bunch of smart people (but mostly dumb people on both sides) wouldn't be argue about this very topic.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I thought we cared a lot about election interference, though?

Illegal activities related to elections are not protected by the first amendment.

However, no court, especially the supreme court, would uphold a law's application to the suppression of free speech if such a conflict does arise.

What illegal activities did twitter engage in when they said that Trump said something unsubstantiated?

Originally posted by dadudemon
I thought we cared a lot about election interference, though?

Illegal activities related to elections are not protected by the first amendment.

However, no court, especially the supreme court, would uphold a law's application to the suppression of free speech if such a conflict does arise.

In general they don't care about election interference. The media here does it all the time. They don't like it when they feel it has negatively impacted them.

Originally posted by BackFire
What illegal activities did twitter engage in when they said that Trump said something unsubstantiated? it's like if I posted an ad in a shop window and the shop owner posted a note on it. That's fine, it's his shop I'm making use of it.

LoL. Trump is 100% right about massive mail-in voting being highly susceptible to voter fraud. Anyone who argues otherwise just shows how truly f***ing dumb they are (or they're just a democrat voter which is pretty much the same thing lol). The so-called "fact-check" of Trump's tweet wasn't a fact check at all.

LoL@ using a CNN source to "fact-check" something.

Imagine if Republicans actually brought in Jack Dorsey to question.

Who here will say Democrats wouldn't lose their shit? Anyone?

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
LoL. Trump is 100% right about massive mail-in voting being highly susceptible to voter fraud. Anyone who argues otherwise just shows how truly f***ing dumb they are (or they're just a democrat voter which is pretty much the same thing lol). The so-called "fact-check" of Trump's tweet wasn't a fact check at all.

LoL@ using a CNN source to "fact-check" something. durwank

Ah so we're gonna gas light. Gotcha.

Originally posted by Surtur
Ah so we're gonna gas light. Gotcha. Backfire is not gaslighting at all.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Backfire is not gaslighting at all.

If he's gonna act like the democrats wouldn't have tried to implement changes via policy if they controlled the senate and white house he is absolutely 100% gas lighting.

Originally posted by Surtur
If he's gonna act like the democrats wouldn't have tried to implement changes via policy if they controlled the senate and white house he is absolutely 100% gas lighting. um, no he isn't gaslighting anyone.

Got to be honest, his latest tweet is hard to believe, even from him.


Facts are the least of his problems.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
um, no he isn't gaslighting anyone.

It depends on if he is saying dems wouldn't have taken more action if they had more control.

If he is, that is gas lighting.

Originally posted by cdtm
Got to be honest, his latest tweet is hard to believe, even from him.


Facts are the least of his problems.

On the other hand: folk who pushed a russian conspiracy for years should probably not be whining about this shit.

Originally posted by Surtur
On the other hand: folk who pushed a russian conspiracy for years should probably not be whining about this shit. I still believe when Trump goes the truth will out. This attack on the first ammendment is another example of how your democracy is being attacked by the Trump administration.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
I still believe when Trumps goes the truth will out.

Then yeah, sit this one out champ

Originally posted by Surtur
On the other hand: folk who pushed a russian conspiracy for years should probably not be whining about this shit.


"Bingo."

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
even if they deleted it, and even if they deleted Trump's account, it's within their rights. oh well, let's watch the great unraveling and humiliation of donald trump, with much laughter

Correct, you do eSign a EULA when you sign up for Twitter (I've never used it, but I know they have one), so you're agreeing to abide by their rules.

But I still think it's important to point out that Twitter did not censor Trump, his tweets can still be read as he wrote them. Trumpers are showing their true colors here once again.

Originally posted by Surtur
Out of curiosity, who here feels they will be consistent with this?

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Bingo! Yeah, Bash us bang on.

More cheerleading.

This is why comparing theoretical possibilities to something that is actually happening is worthless. We know what Trump is now attempting. We have no way of knowing what policy, if any, the Democrats would put in place.

Originally posted by BackFire
This is why comparing theoretical possibilities to something that is actually happening is worthless. We know what Trump is now attempting. We have no way of knowing what policy, if any, the Democrats would put in place.

I just say don't gas light me and pretend the democrats are any different here.

Well yeah, the only difference is power not how they feel about the 1st amendment. Surely you know this. Come on now.

Originally posted by Surtur
More cheerleading.

"he agreed with a fact that hurts my fee-fees, so he's cheerleading REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
"he agreed with a fact that hurts my fee-fees, so he's cheerleading REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"

By your definition of cheerleading it applies to him.

You gonna change the definition or just lie? Either one will be allowed, especially the lie

What are the specifics of what Trump is trying to impose on them?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
I have to be right on the internet cause Im a big baby with no friends.

Surt stop being unbearable. You're being like one of those Star Wars Forum teenagers that wants to start an argument constantly but doesn't actually want to debate or learn but rather just win. Stop taking people out of context then engaging in ad-hominem attacks. The next stage when you are like this is you then pretend you won. It's funny stuff!

Originally posted by Surtur
I just say don't gas light me and pretend the democrats are any different here.

Well yeah, the only difference is power not how they feel about the 1st amendment. Surely you know this. Come on now.

This is what you do every time you can't openly defend a shitty thing from Trump, you defend it from the sidelines and when that fails you try and equalize it. Maybe just call a turd a turd, regardless that you're a Trumper.

ps Democrats > you

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Surt stop being unbearable. You're being like one of those Star Wars Forum teenagers that wants to start an argument constantly but doesn't actually want to debate or learn but rather just win. Stop taking people out of context then engaging in ad-hominem attacks. The next stage when you are like this is you then pretend you won. It's funny stuff!

Dude, the hypocrisy of this post is off the charts.

I love that someone will be dumb enough to agree with you too

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Surt stop being unbearable. You're being like one of those Star Wars Forum teenagers that wants to start an argument constantly but doesn't actually want to debate or learn but rather just win. Stop taking people out of context then engaging in ad-hominem attacks. The next stage when you are like this is you then pretend you won. It's funny stuff!

I wish you would use the same colored glasses with Bashar, he's unbearable at this point. Maybe you could give him some lessons on life.

Originally posted by Robtard
This is what you do every time you can't openly defend a shitty thing from Trump, you defend it from the sidelines and when that fails you try and equalize it. Maybe just call a turd a turd, regardless that you're a Trumper.

ps Democrats > you

Nah, me>>>>>>>>every single democrat ever

Yep, gas light.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
also Bingo, truth is if anyone tried this, people like Backfire, Rob, Bash and I would say exactly what we are now.

You nor the mods can be consistent on this forum so don't go this route kiddo.

Originally posted by Surtur
Nah, I just don't wanna see shitheads who don't care about the first amendment pretend they do.

The democrats do not care about it. Do not gas light me and say they do. I think we have some cognitive dysfunction going on here Surt.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So all the news organization who said there was Russian collusion, tell me about how those fact worked out for you.

Facts are not partisan. That is an indictment of Republican malfeasance.

Originally posted by Surtur
You nor the mods can be consistent on this forum so don't go this route kiddo. Surt, none of this personal none of us are against you, just your position.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
I think we have some cognitive dysfunction going on here Surt.

You can lie, there will be no consequences.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Facts are not partisan. That is an indictment of Republican malfeasance. Also, Bingo!

Originally posted by dadudemon
In this particular case, wrong and wrong.

Also, almost all fact checkers editorialize and bring two heaping scoops of bias.

Fact-checking is definitely editorializing.



If you were correct, a bunch of smart people (but mostly dumb people on both sides) wouldn't be argue about this very topic.

No, you are arguing about this topic, because you are conflating confirming or disconfirming whether a statement is factual with opining about that statement. It is not.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Also, Bingo!

Being consistent, Bash will call this cheerleading.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
No, you are arguing about this topic, because you are conflating confirming or disconfirming whether a statement is factual with opining about that statement. It is not.

Stop assuming you are always right, its fcking annoying and lacks basic understands of life.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
No, you are arguing about this topic, because you are conflating confirming or disconfirming whether a statement is factual with opining about that statement. It is not. Also, Bingo!

Originally posted by Surtur
Being consistent, Bash will call this cheerleading.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Stop assuming you are always right, its fcking annoying and lacks basic understands of life.

If you say, "2+2=5," and I say you are incorrect, did I just fact-check you or did I editorialize? Enlighten us.

Originally posted by Surtur
Out of curiosity, who here feels they will be consistent with this?

Anyone? Why avoid this?

Originally posted by Robtard
Yep

While not just call what Trump is doing shitty and dictator-like and leave it at that.

Cuz you weasels always practice whataboutism?

The hypocrisy is astounding lol.

Jesus guys. Do better.

Gas light, lie, etc.

Nothing will be done

Originally posted by Surtur
Cuz you weasels always practice whataboutism?

The hypocrisy is astounding lol.

Jesus guys. Do better.

^ Literally more whataboutism...

But hey, at least you're not denying it now. Defend Trump and his shitty moves all you like, it's a free country(for now), just be open about it, sport.

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Literally more whataboutism...

But hey, at least you're not denying it now. Defend Trump and his shitty moves all you like, it's a free country(for now), just be open about it, sport.

Have you or any of your e-gang ever practiced whataboutism?

Feel free to lie btw, no consequences