Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/may/29/twitter-hides-donald-trump-tweet-glorifying-violence

What are you saying about the guard?

Originally posted by Silent Master
What are you saying about the guard? ?

Well, you posted it and didn't say you disagreed. but if you don't agree that sending in the guard = glorifying violence. then I apologize.

Thank god he sent in the national guard to deal with these animals.

Yeah, imo that is a fail guardian article.

https://time.com/5645371/trump-rhetoric-violence/

CNN crew arrested...

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/29/us/minneapolis-cnn-crew-arrested/index.html

"A CNN reporter and his production team were arrested this morning in Minneapolis for doing their jobs, despite identifying themselves -- a clear violation of their First Amendment rights. The authorities in Minnesota, including the Governor, must release the three CNN employees immediately," CNN said in a statement shortly after their arrest.


Freedom of speech means shit to the right and it's instruments in Trumps US

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
CNN crew arrested...

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/29/us/minneapolis-cnn-crew-arrested/index.html

"A CNN reporter and his production team were arrested this morning in Minneapolis for doing their jobs, despite identifying themselves -- a clear violation of their First Amendment rights. The authorities in Minnesota, including the Governor, must release the three CNN employees immediately," CNN said in a statement shortly after their arrest.


Freedom of speech means shit to the right and it's instruments in Trumps US


Depends on the details. They were told to move, the question is why? Were they interfering in their work?


No one would defend a reporters right to do their jobs if they hindered firemen emergency responders from doing theirs, would they?

Originally posted by cdtm
Depends on the details. They were told to move, the question is why? Were they interfering in their work?


No one would defend a reporters right to do their jobs if they hindered firemen emergency responders from doing theirs, would they? not what happened.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/cnn-reporting-crew-arrested-camera-police-minneapolis-n1217651

Video above

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
not what happened.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/cnn-reporting-crew-arrested-camera-police-minneapolis-n1217651

Video above


Shows the moment he's arrested. I wish they'd show the moments leading up to it, so we can see if he was suddenly accosted for no reason, or if something else happened.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/may/29/twitter-hides-donald-trump-tweet-glorifying-violence

good. why should twitter risk liability for allowing that shit on their site

What else is Trump supposed to do with his time, if Twitter cock blocks him?


Not like his job requires his full attention. Being President must be pretty easy.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
CNN crew arrested...

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/29/us/minneapolis-cnn-crew-arrested/index.html

"A CNN reporter and his production team were arrested this morning in Minneapolis for doing their jobs, despite identifying themselves -- a clear violation of their First Amendment rights. The authorities in Minnesota, including the Governor, must release the three CNN employees immediately," CNN said in a statement shortly after their arrest.


Freedom of speech means shit to the right and it's instruments in Trumps US


Read about this, this morning when I was taking my morning poop.



I'm having a hard time seeing this as anything but a violation of the first amendment.


Here is the First Amendment Text:




Seems pretty obvious this is a First Amendment violation, to me. Sure, CNN is complete and utter shite and is more or less an enemy of the people. But that's their right protected by the US Constitution.

Originally posted by cdtm
What else is Trump supposed to do with his time, if Twitter cock blocks him?


Not like his job requires his full attention. Being President must be pretty easy.

He should register on Gab.

Originally posted by Surtur
He should register on Gab.


Agreed, 100%.


And he should start gabbing from there and disable his twitter account. Watch as tens of millions join Gab overnight.

Originally posted by cdtm
What else is Trump supposed to do with his time, if Twitter cock blocks him?


Not like his job requires his full attention. Being President must be pretty easy.


I do hope you're being sarcastic there. Being president is not easy lol.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Agreed, 100%.


And he should start gabbing from there and disable his twitter account. Watch as tens of millions join Gab overnight.

and watch hundreds of millions say "Bye, Felicia"

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
and watch hundreds of millions say "Bye, Felicia"

I don't understand why hundreds of millions say that. Why?

Complete fail by the guardian on this one

And so it begins. They already aren't being consistent.

Twitter Censors Trump Tweet Denouncing Riots; Took No Action On Tweets Supporting Riots

the #whataboutism is real

Originally posted by Surtur
And so it begins. They already aren't being consistent.

Twitter Censors Trump Tweet Denouncing Riots; Took No Action On Tweets Supporting Riots


He's the president.


His words have a lot more reach over some nobody troll, and its not really a fair comparison to make.

Wow, I didn't realize Michael Moore was that racist.

Yeah, as if denouncing riots is actually a bad thing lol.

Originally posted by Surtur
And so it begins. They already aren't being consistent.

Twitter Censors Trump Tweet Denouncing Riots; Took No Action On Tweets Supporting Riots

https://i.imgur.com/195maZi.gif

Originally posted by cdtm
He's the president.


His words have a lot more reach over some nobody troll, and its not really a fair comparison to make.

Nah, apply the rules equally or not at all.

And there are a lot of blue check marks, including celebs. So this just doesn't fly at all. They aren't randos with 12 followers.

The false equivalency here is retarded.

How did his tweet glorify violence?

*caution! time waster troll trap ahead*

Yes, I'm aware or your tactics.

Yeah they do bust out the time waster stuff whenever they have no real argument.

It's funny.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
*caution! time waster troll trap ahead* Originally posted by Silent Master
How did his tweet glorify violence? have you been reading the papers? It's explained in most, research, then come back to the thread being informed and able to post mate.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
have you been reading the papers? It's explained in most, research, then come back to the thread being informed and able to post mate.

So, you can't explain how it's glorifying violence.

Thank you for being honest.

You just gotta read the "papers". That's not vague.

Since it's Whirly he probably means "Read The Guardian".

Originally posted by Silent Master
How did his tweet glorify violence?

I don't think it is glorifying violence.

I think it is inciting violence. In an already violent situation, telling the looters and rioters that they are thugs and will be shot for looting is a direct threat of violence and is not protected speech under the first amendment as it will likely make the situation worse or has a significant chance to make it worse especially because the news will make it a very big deal and blow it out of proportions (which is actually protected speech, of now).

My citation is the Supreme Court case Brandenburg v. Ohio.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I don't think it is glorifying violence.

I think it is inciting violence. In an already violent situation, telling the looters and rioters that they are thugs and will be shot for looting is a direct threat of violence and is not protected speech under the first amendment as it will likely make the situation worse or has a significant chance to make it worse especially because the news will make it a very big deal and blow it out of proportions (which is actually protected speech, of now).

My citation is the Supreme Court case Brandenburg v. Ohio.

He's not saying that either he or government agents will be doing the shootings, sounds more like a warning, possibly a prediction

He's also right, as looters have already been shot. re: the looter shot by the Pawn Shop guy.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He's not saying that either he or government agents will be doing the shootings, sounds more like a warning, possibly a prediction

I covered this part with PVS, already.

Trump can assuage the concerns over the incitement to violence by clarifying that the looting causes reactions from the residents and police that could cause more shooting and violence. And that he wants it to stop so no more violence happens.

However, that would be a stretch from his original tweet...still...he could have done it to avoid the censoring.

Edit - This is how adults have a conversation. And it's done. No insults, no page after page bickering. No decade + grudges. No reason to get upset.

https://i.imgur.com/36DKCOs.gif

Originally posted by dadudemon
I covered this part with PVS, already.

Trump can assuage the concerns over the incitement to violence by clarifying that the looting causes reactions from the residents and police that could cause more shooting and violence. And that he wants it to stop so no more violence happens.

However, that would be a stretch from his original tweet...still...he could have done it to avoid the censoring.

Guess I'm just smart enough to have understood the point without the need for clarification.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Guess I'm just smart enough to have understood the point without the need for clarification.

Well...


Okay, this is now how I picture you:


https://i.imgur.com/1ORNe9K.gif



haermm

Originally posted by dadudemon
Well...


Okay, this is now how I picture you:


https://i.imgur.com/1ORNe9K.gif



haermm

As I'm sure you know, It can be difficult being smarter than most people.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Well...


Okay, this is now how I picture you:


https://i.imgur.com/1ORNe9K.gif



haermm

Kanye approves

whoa I leave the thread for a half hour and the resident Cult45 minions are pretend-winning all over the place

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
whoa I leave the thread for a half hour and the resident Cult45 minions are pretend-winning all over the place

Kudos for not using the word chimp

That's cute coming from the biggest pretend-winner on the forum.

it is illegal for police to shoot someone just for looting. trump threatened illegal and unconstitutional homicide. sorry to break up the pretend-victory party

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it is illegal for police to shoot someone just for looting. trump threatened illegal and unconstitutional homicide. sorry to break up the pretend-victory party

i agree just shoot them if they resist arrest

kCjEjRn_CYQ

Originally posted by Surtur
i agree just shoot them if they resist arrest

so we agree? then why did you join the pretend-victory party over s&m's unsprung time waster trap

Seems he just had an issue with you saying trump glorified violence, etc.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it is illegal for police to shoot someone just for looting. trump threatened illegal and unconstitutional homicide. sorry to break up the pretend-victory party

Where did Trump say it would be the police doing the shooting?

Originally posted by Surtur
Seems he just had an issue with you saying trump glorified violence, etc.

should they have instead said "inciting violence and murder", since that would be 100% accurate?

"if the looting starts the shooting starts"

Seems like the looters incited violence against themselves.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
should they have instead said "inciting violence and murder", since that would be 100% accurate?

"if the looting starts the shooting starts"


Be the stupoo get the pew pew.

would you like to answer?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
should they have instead said "inciting violence and murder", since that would be 100% accurate?

"if the looting starts the shooting starts"

Originally posted by Surtur
Seems like the looters incited violence against themselves.

Suicidal basturmation?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
should they have instead said "inciting violence and murder", since that would be 100% accurate?

"if the looting starts the shooting starts"

So, you made up the part about the police.

Thanks for being honest.

so twitter should have censored the tweet for "illegally inciting murder", which would have been 100% accurate. do flips now. All of you.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
so twitter should have censored the tweet for "illegally inciting murder", which would have been 100% accurate. do flips now. All of you.

Twitter should be consistent and is not being consistent, agreed?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
so twitter should have censored the tweet for "illegally inciting murder", which would have been 100% accurate. do flips now. All of you.

Where did he "illegally inciting murder"?

Originally posted by Silent Master
So, you made up the part about the police.

Thanks for being honest.

https://i.imgur.com/w3Gixf3.gif

Originally posted by Silent Master
Where did he "illegally inciting murder"?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg

"if the looting starts the shooting starts"

shooting looters just for looting is an act of murder. simple fact of law. now dodge/duck/flip/deflect. I command it and you will obey me

Originally posted by Surtur
Twitter should be consistent and is not being consistent, agreed?

People have a legal right to protect themselves and their property, so again where is this "illegally inciting murder"?

the President, commander in chief of the armed forces, stated that guns will be fired at looters, just for looting; and made no specification of just homeowners defending their own property.

now continue ducking, dodging, flipping, distorting, etc. I command it and you WILL comply

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
now dodge/duck/flip/deflect. I command it and you will obey me

https://i.imgur.com/1OdZtAa.gif



You can't steal my shtick!


uhuh



Unless you're a jogger. Then it is okay to steal.

https://i.imgur.com/OzHX4fG.gif

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the President, commander in chief of the armed forces, stated that guns will be fired at looters, just for looting; and made no specification of just homeowners defending their own property.

now continue ducking, dodging, flipping, distorting, etc. I command it and you WILL comply

I think the cops, etc. should try to arrest them and not shoot first.

Business owners who are armed? Nah, just shoot these dumb f*cks.

Originally posted by Silent Master
People have a legal right to protect themselves and their property, so again where is this "illegally inciting murder"?

Nah, that only works in states like Texas who have those laws.


You can't do it in Minnesota:



https://www.kare11.com/article/news/local/george-floyd/minn-law-wont-excuse-killing-to-protect-property/89-acc4070f-98dc-49ba-b8d5-625b4d99a6ec

Originally posted by Surtur
I think the cops, etc. should try to arrest them and not shoot first.

Business owners who are armed? Nah, just shoot these dumb f*cks.

so you believe that the police and national guard might disregard the president's clearly implied threat of murder? I hope you're correct in that

The cops cucked when dems told them to stand down, not sure why they'd behave differently now.

glad that me and surt agree that trump broke the law and incited murder. we made such good progress today. we took 2 steps back but then 20 steps forward this day

Originally posted by dadudemon
Nah, that only works in states like Texas who have those laws.


You can't do it in Minnesota:



https://www.kare11.com/article/news/local/george-floyd/minn-law-wont-excuse-killing-to-protect-property/89-acc4070f-98dc-49ba-b8d5-625b4d99a6ec

From your own link "Now if they break into the store, and then they're attacking you, that's different. Then you have physical force against you, and you can defend yourself personally." which most looters will do if you don't let them steal your stuff.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
glad that me and surt agree that trump broke the law and incited murder. we made such good progress today. we took 2 steps back but then 20 steps forward this day

I didn't agree he broke the law, i'm saying i'd prefer looters get shot only if they resist.

But you guys don't care about the rule of law anyways.

I mean yeah a business owner should shoot a looter in his face. No open casket funeral for criminals.

the law is not conditional pending your approval. it is illegal for looters to be shot just for looting (except for in Texas apparently. I have yet to research ddm's claim about that)

how was he not inciting murder?

I didn't speak on illegalities I just said a cop should give them a chance. A small one.

LMFAO. Coming from a democrat- voter that's hilarious. Now suddenly you care about "the law". LOL.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the law is not conditional pending your approval. it is illegal for looters to be shot just for looting (except for in Texas apparently. I have yet to research ddm's claim about that)

how was he not inciting murder?

If they attack you while looting, then yes you can. even DDM's post acknowledged that.

Originally posted by Surtur
I didn't speak on illegalities.

you seem to refuse to speak on illegalities now. why is that, my child?

Originally posted by Silent Master
If they attack you while looting, then yes you can. even DDM's post acknowledged that.

where did trump specify that? he didn't?

"if the looting starts the shooting starts"

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you seem to refuse to speak on illegalities now. why is that, my child?

Mostly cuz I know you and your ilk give two donkey shits about illegalities.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
where did trump specify that? he didn't?

"if the looting starts the shooting starts"

Where did he specific that people should illegally murder looters? he didn't.


Yes, nowhere in that does he say murder anyone. thanks for admitting that I was right.

Originally posted by dadudemon
https://i.imgur.com/w3Gixf3.gif

wrong gif. Allow me:

https://i.imgur.com/g3E5X.gif

(spoiler: s&m will soon threaten to bleed on me and bite ferociously)

Originally posted by Silent Master
Where did he specific that people should illegally murder looters? he didn't.

"if the looting starts the shooting starts"

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
wrong gif. Allow me:

https://i.imgur.com/g3E5X.gif surt will bite your legs off. He is a knight that says reeeeeeeeeee

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
"if the looting starts the shooting starts"

IOW, he never said illegally murder looters.

Thanks for admitting I was right.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
"if the looting starts the shooting starts"

that is a complete sentence, btw

killing looters just for looting is murder.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
surt will bite your legs off. He is a knight that says reeeeeeeeeee

So easy son. So easy.

Originally posted by Surtur
Mostly cuz I know you and your ilk give two donkey shits about illegalities.

presently and conveniently

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
that is a complete sentence, btw

killing looters just for looting is murder.

Where does it say kill or murder?

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
surt will bite your legs off. He is a knight that says reeeeeeeeeee

"the knights who say reeeeee" holy crap that's brilliant!

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
"the knights who say reeeeee" holy crap that's brilliant!

^Cheerleading.

Explain how it isn't

Originally posted by Silent Master
Where does it say kill or murder?

he doesn't have to use the words "kill" or "murder", silly time waster troll. police and military are not trained to "shoot to wound" like in those old cops and robbers movies.

A threat to order the police and/or national guard to shoot Is a clear threat to kill

Originally posted by Surtur
^Cheerleading.

Explain how it isn't

he said, while dutifully shitpost-deflecting for his humiliated e-bro

Do I have this correct, Trump said he would send in the military and then said "if the looting starts the shooting starts".

It doesn't take a brain-trust to see he was threatening military violence against the looters.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
he doesn't have to use the words "kill" or "murder", silly time waster troll. police and military are not trained to "shoot to wound" like in those old cops and robbers movies.

A threat to order the police and/or national guard to shoot Is a clear threat to kill

Where does he say Police or Military?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
he said, while dutifully shitpost-deflecting for his humiliated e-bro

Explain how it isn't cheerleading.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
surt will bite your legs off. He is a knight that says reeeeeeeeeee

https://media3.giphy.com/media/TIPKiXkdZjEdy/200.gif

Brilliant!

Originally posted by Robtard
Do I have this correct, Trump said he would send in the military and then said "if the looting starts the shooting starts".

It doesn't take a brain-trust to see he was threatening military violence against the looters.

s&m is gonna try as hard as he can, though

Originally posted by Robtard
https://media3.giphy.com/media/TIPKiXkdZjEdy/200.gif

Brilliant!

You're a good friend to the guy, pretending to laugh

Originally posted by Surtur
Explain how it isn't cheerleading.

because it was an excellent pun. if ddm said it I would also have been forced to laugh out loud. maybe you don't find it funny because you're upset and your back hurts

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
s&m is gonna try as hard as he can, though


Trumpers gonna be Trumpy. Par for the course.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
because it was an excellent pun. if ddm said it I would also have been forced to laugh out loud. maybe you don't find it funny because you're upset and your back hurts

So it's cheerleading you just lack the balls to call it that. Gotcha. A loser will be along shortly to agree with you.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Where does he say Police or Military?

it was implied in his tweet. Re: sending national guard in to murder looters. your silly games are so infantile, s&m.

Originally posted by Surtur
So it's cheerleading you just lack the balls to call it that. Gotcha. A loser will be along shortly to agree with you.

I see you've hit defcon 3. I guess you will once again try to manipulate the mods into banning people very shortly.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it was implied in his tweet. Re: sending national guard in to murder looters. your silly games are so infantile, s&m.

TBF, SilentMaster might not be aware that the National Guard is part of the US military, a facet of the US Army and US Air Force.

So Trump just threatened to use the US military to murder Americans on American soil. He really wants to be like China.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
I see you've hit defcon 3. I guess you will once again try to manipulate the mods into banning people very shortly.

Nah, mod already admitted he shouldn't have done what he did. That concession has been accepted.

But you tried

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it was implied in his tweet. Re: sending national guard in to murder looters. your silly games are so infantile, s&m.

So, he never said it and you're just making things up.

Thank you for admitting I was right.

Originally posted by Robtard
TBF, SilentMaster might not be aware that the National Guard is part of the US military, a facet of the US Army and US Air Force.

So Trump just threatened to use the US military to murder Americans on American soil. He really wants to be like China.

but I though he is was in the armed forces...that should be common knowledge to him, along with "discharging firearm at a person= intended lethal force". I have questions now

Originally posted by Silent Master
So, he never said it and you're just making things up.

Thank you for admitting I was right.

nope, that's just your defense mechanisms springing up because you know you've been proven flat wrong.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nope, that's just your defense mechanisms springing up because you know you've been proven flat wrong.

Really, then please point out where he actually said to murder looters or that "if the looting starts the shooting starts" was referring to the police, rather than people trying to protect themselves from the violence.

"if the looting starts the shooting starts" was a complete sentence and a clearly implied threat of lethal force at the mere sign of looting,
unconditional to any added circumstances, which is illegal. -fact

he commands the armed forces, so how was the national guard not supposed to interpret that as informal marching orders?

maybe you should just go for the trusty old "he was being sarcastic" defense, because there is no way to spin his statement to mean anything other than an incitement for murder

Ok, now point out where he actually said to murder looters or that "if the looting starts the shooting starts" was referring to the police, rather than people trying to protect themselves from the violence.


I'm not asking for what you think he meant.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
"if the looting starts the shooting starts" was a complete sentence and a clearly implied threat of lethal force at the mere sign of looting,
unconditional to any added circumstances, which is illegal. -fact

he commands the armed forces, so how was the national guard not supposed to interpret that as informal marching orders?

maybe you should just go for the trusty old "he was being sarcastic" defense, because there is no way to spin his statement to mean anything other than an incitement for murder

Trump is using the "I wasn't serious!" defense after even military people went "WTF did he just say!?".


-Trump later clarified his tweets by adding that it was merely an "expression" that was "spoken as a fact, not as a statement." -Snip

Originally posted by Robtard
Trump is using the "I wasn't serious!" defense after even military people went "WTF did he just say!?".


-Trump later clarified his tweets by adding that it was merely an "expression" that was "spoken as a fact, not as a statement." -Snip

Is that defense not valid? Say it

now you're backpedaling to previous failed spin attempts. he made a general statement that shooting will start as a response to looting, in the same tweet in which he announced that he's sending in the national guard. the implied threat to have looters shot just for looting is clear, and that would be murder. Since inciting murder is illegal, trump already broke the law without a shot fired

what a surprise, s&m arguing in bad faith and time-wasting

Originally posted by Robtard
Trump is using the "I wasn't serious!" defense after even military people went "WTF did he just say!?".


-Trump later clarified his tweets by adding that it was merely an "expression" that was "spoken as a fact, not as a statement." -Snip

will that work? making a terroristic threat on american citizens and later following up with "just kidding"?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
now you're backpedaling to previous failed spin attempts. he made a general statement that shooting will start as a response to looting, in the same tweet in which he announced that he's sending in the national guard. the implied threat to have looters shot just for looting is clear, and that would be murder. Since inciting murder is illegal, trump already broke the law without a shot fired

what a surprise, s&m arguing in bad faith and time-wasting

So you admit that he never said that he would order the police or military to murder people just for looting like you claimed.

Thanks for admitting you were wrong.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So you admit that he never said that he would order the police or military to murder people just for looting like you claimed.

Thanks for admitting you were wrong.

nope. that is just more of your juvenile defense mechanisms springing up because you were proven flat wrong.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nope. that is just more of your juvenile defense mechanisms springing up because you were proven flat wrong.

So, you're sticking to your claim that he said that he would order the police or military to murder people just for looting?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
will that work? making a terroristic threat on american citizens and later following up with "just kidding"?



It has before and surely will with the majority of Trumpers; who he cares about.

s&m, he directly implied it, as I said over and over and over and nauseum, as per your insistence on being a time-waster troll

but the implications

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
he directly implied it, as I said over and over and over and nauseum, as per your insurance to be a time-waster troll

So, you're sticking to the claim?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
s&m, he directly implied it, as I said over and over and over and nauseum, as per your insurance to be a time-waster troll

SilentMaster knows it was directly implied, he's just scrapping to defend their orange lord. Pay him no mind.

which claim, s&m? my actual claim or the one you're trying to put in my mouth?

Originally posted by Robtard
SilentMaster knows it was directly implied, he's just scrapping to defend their orange lord. Pay him no mind.

nah I want him to keep punching his walls. I've decided that he's losing his 'month and a half rent' security deposit tonight. no last word for s&m this time.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
which claim, s&m? my actual claim or the one you're trying to put in my mouth?

If that wasn't your claim, just say "that's not what I'm claiming".

Originally posted by Silent Master
If that wasn't your claim, just say "that's not what I'm claiming".

he directly implied that he will order the national guard to shoot looters simply for looting, and nothing more.

"Just spoke to Governor Tim Walz and told him that the Military is with him all the way. Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you!"

that's a direct threat, and no other circumstances besides "looting" were stated or even suggested

The looting started a while ago, where is the supposed Trump ordered police/military shooting?

Originally posted by Surtur
but the implications are good enough for silent to use in his arguments

"By calling him a victim, you're implying it wasn't justified."-silent

So they should be good enough for bash to use in an argument against him Right?

Nah, Bash is a piece of dog shit and I know you agree cuz you're consistent.

Right?

Originally posted by Silent Master
The looting started a while ago, where is the supposed Trump ordered police/military shooting?

Trump's disability in recognizing time and the chronological order of events does not negate his threat:

"when the looting starts, the shooting starts"

Originally posted by Surtur
Nah, Bash is a piece of dog shit and I know you agree cuz you're consistent.

Right?

anything to contribute to the topic or are you just going meltdown in every single thread?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
anything to contribute to the topic or are you just going meltdown in every single thread?

I'm giving Raptor a chance to be consistent.

I know he will take it without cucking to you guys.

Originally posted by Surtur
Nah, Bash is a piece of dog shit and I know you agree cuz you're consistent.

Right? lol how does that make any sense at all.

Have i called someone a piece of dog shit for doing the same thing Bash has done then failed to call him one for doing the same.

Or are u just making up crazy stuff to distract from ur admitted hypocrisy?

Originally posted by Raptor22
lol how does that make any sense at all.

Have i called someone a piece of dog shit for doing the same thing Bash has done then failed to call him one for doing the same.

Or are u just making up crazy stuff to distract from ur admitted hypocrisy?

Nah you just never run your mouth to the other side, like the little weasel you are

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm giving Raptor a chance to be consistent.

I know he will take it without cucking to you guys.

oh I get it, you're rescuing your time-waster e-bro with a diversion so he can escape, because you're taking my own threat seriously:


Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nah I want him to keep punching his walls. I've decided that he's losing his 'month and a half rent' security deposit tonight. no last word for s&m this time.

Originally posted by Surtur
Nah you just never run your mouth to the other side, like the little weasel you are so just making up crazy stuff to distract from ur admitted hypocrisy.

Thank u for being honest about it

I'm allowing the pathetic souls here to cuck to you Bash and not be consistent.

I feel I'm doing you a favor, cuz these cucks couldn't stand up to criticism.

Am I wrong i granting these folk a favor?

Originally posted by Raptor22
so just making up crazy stuff to distract from ur admitted hypocrisy.

Thank u for being honest about it

Oh kid, show me you opening your mouth once against them.

Just once, show me consistency. Or cease.

Originally posted by Surtur
Nah, Bash is a piece of dog shit and I know you agree cuz you're consistent.

Right?
Originally posted by Surtur
Nah you just never run your mouth to the other side, like the little weasel you are


Why the uncalled for aggression in every thread?

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm allowing the pathetic souls here to cuck to you Bash and not be consistent.

I feel I'm doing you a favor, cuz these cucks couldn't stand up to criticism.

Am I wrong i granting these folk a favor? is this where u show ur consistent and ask the mods to ban u for making stuff up?

Why is that aggression?

Originally posted by Raptor22
is this where u show ur consistent and ask the mods to ban u for making stuff up?

Nope! Mods admitted they f*cked up and I accepted their concession.

I did give u a chance to show you're consistent tho.

^smokescreen deployed. now's your chance, s&m. RETREAT!

I honestly wanna know how my behavior is aggressive while at the same time explaining why those lefties here who behave the same are not aggressive

I'd love an explanation.

Originally posted by Surtur
Why is that aggression?

Y-y-you called Bash "dog shit" and Raptor a "little weasel", on top of your general hostile tone...

Originally posted by Surtur
Oh kid, show me you opening your mouth once against them.

Just once, show me consistency. Or cease. http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=17176545&highlight=userid%3A118272#post17176545

Originally posted by Raptor22
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=17176545&highlight=userid%3A118272#post17176545

So you didn't. Gotcha.