Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

This time around its Toys for Bob who have had success with the Spyro Reignited Trilogy & Crash Bandicoot 4

https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2021-04-30-activision-puts-crash-bandicoot-4-dev-toys-for-bob-on-call-of-duty-warzone-development-duty

**** Activison with how many game studio's that they've moved to work on CoD.

https://i.imgur.com/42xZiMZ.jpg

That means four year dev time per game, right? Maybe that's a good thing.

Not that I care about COD or am going to buy any of them.

You can't fault them....clearly CoD makes the oodles of money and Spyro and Crash clearly do not.

Regardless of that **** Activison and on the topic of CoD, I haven't touched it since Black Ops 2.

Originally posted by Smasandian
You can't fault them....clearly CoD makes the oodles of money and Spyro and Crash clearly do not.
According to this list, CoD Cold War did poorly while Crash 4 and Tony Hawk helped turn a profit, but then they killed their studios to help with future Call of Duty.

https://twitter.com/HBJohnXuandou/status/1394436795333447682?s=20

So yes, I can fault them.

Wait....this doesn't mean CoD Cold War didn't do well.

It just means CoD Cold War did less than previous CoD at retail. And that having Tony Hawk and Crash 4 helped the retail revenue.

Nowhere does it say Crash 4 and Tony Hawk did better than CoD.

Yeah...I'm not crushing on anything. I said you cannot fault them considering they believe CoD is their money maker.

I could care less if there is more CoD or more Crash games...I haven't bought a CoD in a few years and I don't give a shit about Crash.