U.S. Supreme Court sides with Catholic foster agency

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



Klaw
Source.

I'm not sure how I feel about this.

On the one hand, private businesses should be allowed to turn away customers for any reason.

OTOH, kids are involved, and I'd rather them be in a caring homosexual household than no household at all.

Robtard
It's because those Far-Right Catholics want to keep as many children under their care as possible. Deplorables.


But it's being touted as "a victory for conservatives", why do conservative victories usually rely on intolerance and cruelty being the driving forces?

ilikecomics
Originally posted by Klaw
Source.

I'm not sure how I feel about this.

On the one hand, private businesses should be allowed to turn away customers for any reason.

OTOH, kids are involved, and I'd rather them be in a caring homosexual household than no household at all.

I wonder what the rates of child molestation is in gay vs straight couples.

Klaw
Originally posted by ilikecomics
I wonder what the rates of child molestation is in gay vs straight couples.

What are you implying?

Klaw
I'm not sure a foster agency should be rooted in Religion.

Foster agencies should do what's in the best interest of the child(s).

ilikecomics
Originally posted by Klaw
What are you implying?

I'm not implying anything. I was actually wondering.
If it's much higher in gay couples that could be a reason the catholic church would want to discriminate.
If the reverse is true, then that's increasing the likelihood of victimization of children.

ilikecomics
Originally posted by Klaw
I'm not sure a foster agency should be rooted in Religion.

Foster agencies should do what's in the best interest of the child(s).

It depends if it's public or private.
If it's religious I'm assuming it's privitize, which would automatically be better for kids.

ilikecomics
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0049089X12000610

This paper compares the children of gays vs. straights

Whoops the paper is locked
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kids-of-gay-parents-fare-worse-study-finds-but-draws-fire-from-experts/

Robtard
The NFSS was a flawed study, not grounded in science.

Also, it's clear now you and Klaw had planned this with that agenda, so another silly Klaw bait thread :/

Klaw
Originally posted by ilikecomics
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0049089X12000610

This paper compares the children of gays vs. straights

Whoops the paper is locked
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kids-of-gay-parents-fare-worse-study-finds-but-draws-fire-from-experts/

Correlation, not causation?

ilikecomics
Originally posted by Klaw
Correlation, not causation?

Sure, I'm not committed to the idea that homosexuals are bad parents.
Overall homosexuals do have higher time preference, which I don't think is great for a parenting mind set.

Klaw
Shouldn't a foster agency do what's in the child(s) best interest?

ilikecomics
Originally posted by Robtard
The NFSS was a flawed study, not grounded in science.

Also, it's clear now you and Klaw had planned this with that agenda, so another silly Klaw bait thread :/

Why is the study flawed ? The sample size was pretty big at 15 k.

Why would we plan a thread ?

ilikecomics
Originally posted by Klaw
Shouldn't a foster agency do what's in the child(s) best interest?

I believe in a child market.

Edit: so yes, society should do what's best for children.

Klaw
We planned this?

Hilarious.

ilikecomics
Originally posted by Klaw
We planned this?

Hilarious.

The commies had komintern.

We are libertarianworldwide

We are the gramschians of the right.

Robtard
Originally posted by ilikecomics
Why is the study flawed ? The sample size was pretty big at 15 k.

Why would we plan a thread ?

Since you like wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Family_Structures_Study

"Most notably, only 2 children in the study had actually lived with homosexually partnered parents for their entire childhoods." -snip

Robtard
Originally posted by Klaw
We planned this?

Hilarious.

Yes.

Actually, I did actually have a small laugh at how silly and obvious you two were here.

ilikecomics
Originally posted by Robtard
Since you like wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Family_Structures_Study

"Most notably, only 2 children in the study had actually lived with homosexually partnered parents for their entire childhoods." -snip

Oh cool, thank you for letting me know.

I like Wikipedia in concept, but there's some hiccups in practice i.e. Stefan molyneux's page.

Overall Wikipedia is cool with me for the most part.

ilikecomics
Originally posted by Robtard
Yes.

Actually, I did actually have a small laugh at how silly and obvious you two were here.

We don't talk except for in posts.

Klaw
Originally posted by ilikecomics
We don't talk except for in posts.

thumb up

Old Man Whirly!
Originally posted by Robtard
Yes.

Actually, I did actually have a small laugh at how silly and obvious you two were here. They are such lazy trollinglaughing out loud it's possible ilikecomics is Klaw of course.

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.