Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

This got posted in a WhatsApp group I belong to. So I screen shot it and made it my own.

https://i.imgur.com/OZEkdBl.jpeg

Your uncleared notifications and battery level are making me uncomfortable

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Your uncleared notifications and battery level are making me uncomfortable it's not my original screenshot well it sort of is. Just not Originally or of my phone.

elon musk's twitter and newsmax are already circulating conspiracy theories that it was staged. disgusting garbage people are crawling out of their discord hugboxes and returning to twitter in full force.

We should start our own conspiracy theories about it.

He was injured during their extremely violent sex dungeon shenanigans involving medieval torture equipment they got gifted from Queen Elizabeth in her will.

Botched suicide attempt?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
elon musk's twitter and newsmax are already circulating conspiracy theories that it was staged. disgusting garbage people are crawling out of their discord hugboxes and returning to twitter in full force. Tell me about it, I believe Musk is a very dangerous person.

While I personally do not believe this was staged because occam's razor, is it your position that out governments would not stage anything?

I mean, we know some governments do. Ned Price admitted Russia was planning on using crisis actors. So we know it happens, but not from our side beause why.... Because we're too moral?

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Tell me about it, I believe Musk is a very dangerous person.

seems like it

In his defence, having somewhere that isn't an echo chamber hugbox isn't a bad idea on the face of it. It won't be well implemented though.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
In his defence, having somewhere that isn't an echo chamber hugbox isn't a bad idea on the face of it. It won't be well implemented though. You see, I believe there are decent people and people who basically aren't. Amongst desent people we can disagree. For instance Imp believes transwomen are not women, I disagree, I believe a women's psyche can exist in a man and vice versa, obviously biologically he is right and instinctually I am not attracted to dick. That said, he is and Adam is, which I also don't have a problem with and believe is a good thing, anything that brings love and affection between consenting adults in my opinion is fine.

You and I often disagree, but I see you as a decent person and our disagreements are never morally abhorrent. The other kind of people spread lies, it's not about differences of opinion with them; it's about ignorance and bigotry. I do not believe those people can be engaged with rationally, because they are irrational.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
You see, I believe there are decent people and people who basically aren't. Amongst desent people we can disagree. For instance Imp believes transwomen are not women, I disagree, I believe a women's psyche can exist in a man and vice versa, obviously biologically he is right and instinctually I am not attracted to dick. That said, he is and Adam is, which I also don't have a problem with and believe is a good thing, anything that brings love and affection between consenting adults in my opinion is fine.

You and I often disagree, but I see you as a decent person and our disagreements are never morally abhorrent. The other kind of people spread lies, it's not about differences of opinion with them it's about ignorance and bigotry. I do not believe those people can be engaged with rationally because they are irrational.


Whirly, this stance conflicts with a core tenant of left wing idealogy: Rehabilitation.


If it is truely your belief that unredemptive evil people exist, then where do you fall on prison reform?

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
You see, I believe there are decent people and people who basically aren't. Amongst desent people we can disagree. For instance Imp believes transwomen are not women, I disagree, I believe a women's psyche can exist in a man and vice versa, obviously biologically he is right and instinctually I am not attracted to dick. That said, he is and Adam is, which I also don't have a problem with and believe is a good thing, anything that brings love and affection between consenting adults in my opinion is fine.

You and I often disagree, but I see you as a decent person and our disagreements are never morally abhorrent. The other kind of people spread lies, it's not about differences of opinion with them; it's about ignorance and bigotry. I do not believe those people can be engaged with rationally, because they are irrational.

I don't disagree with any of that but you don't change people's minds by allowing them to stew with others with the same opinions as them. There will be some, maybe many, maybe the majority, who will never change their minds. But the attempt is still worth it for the few who do.

You shouldn't moderate people's opinions, no matter how abhorrent. Only the manner of how they express those opinions.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I don't disagree with any of that but you don't change people's minds by allowing them to stew with others with the same opinions as them. There will be some, maybe many, maybe the majority, who will never change their minds. But the attempt is still worth it for the few who do.

You shouldn't moderate people's opinions, no matter how abhorrent. Only the manner of how they express those opinions. Therein is another point where we can politely disagree. I genuinely believe some people are so stupid they need protection from misinformation', because it can affect everyone and not just them. Look at Covid misinformation, Trumper actions caused how many people behaving sensibly to die. Jan 6 hurt so many people who weren't buying into the big lie. Some types of censorship are needed imo, to protect people from themselves, and others from other people.

So, some people need to protect stupid people from doing stupid things?

And yet all those people were stewing in echo chambers without anyone challenging their opinions.

It's essentially cult like with people being encouraged to distance themselves from people who don't agree with them on whatever issue it is until it becomes complete isolation coupled with a feedback loop.

Originally posted by Macklemore
So, some people need to protect stupid people from doing stupid things? In a nutshell, yes! Particularly, as the easily influenced by stupid ideas can seriously be affected easily by them; affecting them, and other people detrimentally. For instance, the rhetoric of the Nazi's, led to people killing jews. The rhetoric of Trump, led to people taking Ivermectin and Storming the Capitol, both leading to deaths. The internet allows groups of stupid people, to meet other groups of agreeing stupid people, in order to be triggered into doing stupid things by stupid ideas, all too easily!

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
And yet all those people were stewing in echo chambers without anyone challenging their opinions.

It's essentially cult like with people being encouraged to distance themselves from people who don't agree with them on whatever issue it is until it becomes complete isolation coupled with a feedback loop. I think I answer that above. Additionally tools like Twitter reach more stupid people than hugboxes. Trumps calls to arms were through Twitter.

So, what do we do about it?

Originally posted by Macklemore
So, what do we do about it? Pretty much what was going on, keep the crazy out of the mainstream, challenge it as being stupid as ****.

Originally posted by Macklemore
So, what do we do about it?
Round them all up and send them off to those FEMA camps that that never existed.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Round them all up and send them off to those FEMA camps that that never existed. not a bad plan B!

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Pretty much what was going on, keep the crazy out of the mainstream, challenge it as being stupid as ****. Reason with logic and sensibility. That's good.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Round them all up and send them off to those FEMA camps that that never existed. Too extreme.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
And yet all those people were stewing in echo chambers without anyone challenging their opinions.

It's essentially cult like with people being encouraged to distance themselves from people who don't agree with them on whatever issue it is until it becomes complete isolation coupled with a feedback loop.

New Twitter won't change this. It's very easy to insulate yourself on twitter from people with ideas you don't like or whatever. That won't change. The only thing that will change is some people will get unbanned and more shitheads will feel emboldened, but they should be easy enough to avoid and ignore.

Personally I don't use twitter much, I basically use it to follow video game and movie news, and a few people in those industries I find interesting, and so I never really see anything on twitter outside of those topics unless I actively seek it out. Trump will probably be unbanned but it's not like everyone on the site will be forced to read his shitposting.

Originally posted by Robtard
Ah, a Qanon nutter, zero surprise there.

Not every Trumper is a Qanon acolyte, but every Qanon acolyte is a Trumper.

David DePape
https://hindiqueries.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Who-is-David-DePape.jpg

Enjoy prison, dumbass.

Originally posted by BackFire
New Twitter won't change this. It's very easy to insulate yourself on twitter from people with ideas you don't like or whatever. That won't change. The only thing that will change is some people will get unbanned and more shitheads will feel emboldened, but they should be easy enough to avoid and ignore.

Which is why I said...

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
In his defence, having somewhere that isn't an echo chamber hugbox isn't a bad idea on the face of it. It won't be well implemented though.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Round them all up and send them off to those FEMA camps that that never existed.


I mean, Whirl talks like he hasen't read Fahrenheit 451.

Originally posted by BackFire
New Twitter won't change this. It's very easy to insulate yourself on twitter from people with ideas you don't like or whatever. That won't change. The only thing that will change is some people will get unbanned and more shitheads will feel emboldened, but they should be easy enough to avoid and ignore.

Personally I don't use twitter much, I basically use it to follow video game and movie news, and a few people in those industries I find interesting, and so I never really see anything on twitter outside of those topics unless I actively seek it out. Trump will probably be unbanned but it's not like everyone on the site will be forced to read his shitposting. you can insulate yourself, yes. Society, not so much.

Read more on the attack, it was very serious. Bloody disgusting.

it was blatantly an assassination attempt on the speaker of the house which didn't go according to plan

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it was blatantly an assassination attempt on the speaker of the house which didn't go according to plan and her poor husband got seriously hurt into the bargain.

Occam's razor. It's enough that a mentally ill individual who slipped through the cracks of the health system cracked and assaulted him. Talks of deliberate assassination attempts from a party are conspiracy theory.

Is 24/7 garbage-human incel begging us for attention? i wouldn't know since he's on ignore, but sure looks like it

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Is 24/7 garbage-human incel begging us for attention? i wouldn't know since he's on ignore, but sure looks like it Quite probably, I also have that thing on ignore too, so I have no idea!

Originally posted by cdtm
Occam's razor. It's enough that a mentally ill individual who slipped through the cracks of the health system cracked and assaulted him. Talks of deliberate assassination attempts from a party are conspiracy theory. iyrc

Originally posted by Macklemore
iyrc

Course I care. An elderly man was assaulted, that's no laughing matter.

shame i had to put someone else back on ignore for acting like a cvnt again

Originally posted by cdtm
Occam's razor. It's enough that a mentally ill individual who slipped through the cracks of the health system cracked and assaulted him. Talks of deliberate assassination attempts from a party are conspiracy theory.

And yet he was shouting for her, not him.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
And yet he was shouting for her, not him.

Which proves he's a dangerous and ill partisan, not part of some GoP conspiracy.


I mean, I'm fine with arguments that the rhetoric had a bad effect on him. I don't believe at all that anyone really wants someone to actually attack her or her husband or anyone else.

And I'd argue it's unfair to blame that rhetoric on one side, politics in the US has been a cesspool for awhile now. It's all about scoring points, everything else is seen as fair game to that.

You don't have to be part of a conspiracy to attempt to assassinate someone.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
You don't have to be part of a conspiracy to attempt to assassinate someone.

Isn't assassination planned political action though?

I mean, if John Wilks Booth was just some random nutter, wouldn't it simply be a random act of violence from a nut, instead of legitimate political assassination?

that would be convenient wouldn't it

Originally posted by NewGuy01
that would be convenient wouldn't it

Yeah, but it happens. A crazy person shoots someone, you don't blame their rivals, even if they benefit.

Originally posted by cdtm
Isn't assassination planned political action though?


He obviously planned it and it was obviously politically motivated.

Him being a basket case doesn't remove that fact.

This attempted murder of Nancy Pelosi is an offshoot of the Jan 6th attack, insurrection and coup on the capitol.

What's funny, this 42 year was struggling with an 82 year old for control of the hammer when the police arrived. The police ordered both of them to let go of the hammer, Paul Pelosi did, that's when this Trumper attacked.

Originally posted by Robtard

What's funny, this 42 year was struggling with an 82 year old for control of the hammer


Lol


Originally posted by Robtard
The police ordered both of them to let go of the hammer, Paul Pelosi did, that's when this Trumper attacked.


What a coward.

There's nothing funny about this one Rob

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
There's nothing funny about this one Rob

This part is funny: "What's funny, this 42 year was struggling with an 82 year old for control of the hammer.."

Cos how weak does one have to be at 42 that you can overpower a skinny 82 year old man?


The breaking and entering, attempted murder and assault are obviously not funny. I also think similar is going to happen again, especially if the Right ends up losing or not doing as well as they should come the midterms.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
He obviously planned it and it was obviously politically motivated.

Him being a basket case doesn't remove that fact.

The police reported today that among his affects, DePape had zip ties and a hit list of other targets.

but that never happened, because in US(SR), real news is fake news, conspiracy fantasies are the truth, up is down, evil is good

Originally posted by Robtard
This part is funny: "What's funny, this 42 year was struggling with an 82 year old for control of the hammer.."

Cos how weak does one have to be at 42 that you can overpower a skinny 82 year old man?


The breaking and entering, attempted murder and assault are obviously not funny. I also think similar is going to happen again, especially if the Right ends up losing or not doing as well as they should come the midterms.

We've got plenty of extremely skinny, malnourished, anemic kmcers who would lose 1 on 1 against an infant or 200yo geezer in a cage match.

Do you even kmc, bro?

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
We've got plenty of extremely skinny, malnourished, anemic kmcers who would lose 1 on 1 against an infant or 200yo geezer in a cage match.

Do you even kmc, bro?

https://c.tenor.com/R2XQj18G2UQAAAAC/fair-point-tom-ellis.gif

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Do you even kmc, bro?

I heard briefly about this incident on NPR radio. Crazy that it was just a little blurb on the news. Our country is getting too crazy.

I heard from a Conservative coworker that Twitter is apparently spreading that the attacker was Paul Pelosi's man-whore?

Oh lord..

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
I heard briefly about this incident on NPR radio. Crazy that it was just a little blurb on the news. Our country is getting too crazy.

I heard from a Conservative coworker that Twitter is apparently spreading that the attacker was Paul Pelosi's man-whore?

Oh lord..





Come on Whirly, thats hilarious!

nah

Prominent Rightist egg these deplorables on and on, then after an attack happens they wash their hands and start deflecting. "Inside job!", "He was actually a Leftist", "False flags!".

Remember the MAGAbomber thread. I do.

Three most prominent Rightist conspiracys concerning the attempted murder of Paul Pelosi:

-The attacker is Nancy's lover and the relationship soured
-The attacker is Paul's lover and the relationship soured
-It was an inside job to make the Right look bad before the mid term election

every single trumper at this point is an imbecilic garbage-human

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
I heard briefly about this incident on NPR radio. Crazy that it was just a little blurb on the news. Our country is getting too crazy.

I heard from a Conservative coworker that Twitter is apparently spreading that the attacker was Paul Pelosi's man-whore?

Oh lord..

I heard that too.

Would explain why he was nekked yet still somehow managed to break in. I mean, their home has walls and a gate, either he was invited in or he somehow scaled a wall while in nothing but shorts.

Originally posted by cdtm
I heard that too.

Would explain why he was nekked yet still somehow managed to break in. I mean, their home has walls and a gate, either he was invited in or he somehow scaled a wall while in nothing but shorts.


By police accounts David Depape was not naked when he broke in and attacked, not that him being naked would prove he knew Paul or Nancy Pelosi beforehand.

See:

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
every single trumper at this point is an imbecilic garbage-human

Originally posted by Robtard
It's not true, by police accounts.

Why would a naked lunatic mean he knew the Pelosi's beforehand, compared to a not naked lunatic?

Walls, Rob.


A naked lunatic getting past walls and a gate to break into a home sure as shit would raise questions.

Originally posted by cdtm
Walls, Rob.


A naked lunatic getting past walls and a gate to break into a home sure as shit would raise questions.

The wall around the house is just a privacy wall, it's not some 50 foot barbed wired thing, I could scale it and I'm older than 42.

He wasn't naked. Not that being naked means a person can't suddenly scale a wall. You Trumpers are as silly as you are deplorable.

dp

Here is the impregnable fortess, folks:

https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/10/pelosi_home.jpg

Trumpers proving, once again, that they are human garbage.

Originally posted by Robtard
If he's a crazy as claimed, being naked is just another layer on the crazy onion.


Yeah of course could just mean he was mentally ill.

Originally posted by Robtard
Fair enough. But it's not true, he had clothes on, along with his hammer and zipties, Which he allegedly planned on detaining Nancy Pelosi and torturing her to death. He had other Democrat leaders on his hit list.


I get that he had clothes on, so no idea why we're talking about this Except that I think you said it wouldn't have mattered if he didn't have clothes on so was just disagreeing with that part. It would mean either he was mentally ill, and if not, then would give some credence to the idea that he was already in the house, boinking one if not both of them.

If he had a hit list, then have to question how mentally ill he was. Because That just sounds like a terrorist. Now arguably all terrorists are mentally ill to some degree, but we shouldn't pick and choose which ones we declare mentally ill based on how serious or bad we decide the actions were.

Originally posted by cdtm
Reports claim shorts.

So was he wearing shoes?


Look at the video of their place:

YmrLpYA4cTE

You have walls and a gate. So how did he get in?

Over the wall? Past the gate? Was everything open and he walked in?

Why does Poe's shot not look anything like the one in this video?

You can clearly see barricades in mine.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Here is the impregnable fortess, folks:

https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/10/pelosi_home.jpg

Trumpers proving, once again, that they are human garbage.


Never mind, this is a better shot:

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/pelosi-home-break-in-caught-on-security-cameras/#app

She kind of lives in a crummy place for her station. Isn't she rich? Buy a walled mansion!

Pelosi ? She must be super rich. Not just from her job but her and her husbands investments which beat most mutual funds. Theyre genius investors or more likely taking advantage of the inside info she gets from her position.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Pelosi ? She must be super rich. Not just from her job but her and her husbands investments which beat most mutual funds. Theyre genius investors or more likely taking advantage of the inside info she gets from her position.

Not sure about current laws, but it used to be that insider trading for legislators was legal.

Originally posted by cdtm
Not sure about current laws, but it used to be that insider trading for legislators was legal.


Think her husband does the stock trades. So totally legit.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yeah of course could just mean he was mentally ill.




I get that he had clothes on, so no idea why we're talking about this Except that I think you said it wouldn't have mattered if he didn't have clothes on so was just disagreeing with that part. It would mean either he was mentally ill, and if not, then would give some credence to the idea that he was already in the house, boinking one if not both of them.

If he had a hit list, then have to question how mentally ill he was. Because That just sounds like a terrorist. Now arguably all terrorists are mentally ill to some degree, but we shouldn't pick and choose which ones we declare mentally ill based on how serious or bad we decide the actions were.


This is definitely more Right-Wing terrorism, he had a list of people and a plan. eg if he were Muslim and did the same thing, it would be labelled "Islamic Terrorism".


Turns out he's a Canadian who entered the US through the US/Mexico border and overstayed his visit, so he's an illegal. The Right is going to spin, spin and spin this some more. Just watch and laugh.

Originally posted by Robtard
Turns out he's a Canadian who entered the US through the US/Mexico border and overstayed his visit, so he's an illegal. We're a shifty lot, we also find a way in.

You know him, don't you.

Originally posted by Robtard
The wall around the house is just a privacy wall, it's not some 50 foot barbed wired thing, I could scale it and I'm older than 42.

He wasn't naked. Not that being naked means a person can't suddenly scale a wall. You Trumpers are as silly as you are deplorable.

I posted a picture. There is not a barrier of any kind. Anyone can walk up to the house from the sidewalk. Hence, it not being some impregnable fortress.

Fair enough, I thought the side the Trumper broke into had a small privacy wall.

Another example of a black man being beaten by white supremacist scumbags.

Abolish the police.

Pelosi announced today that she is stepping down next year and while I'm happy as I've said for years all these decades long career politicians should move on, it's sad that she's doing it out of fear for her family's safety, as the next unhinged Rightist could bring a gun instead of hammer.

Originally posted by Robtard
Pelosi announced today that she is stepping down next year and while I'm happy as I've said for years all these decades long career politicians should move on, it's sad that she's doing it out of fear for her family's safety, as the next unhinged Rightist could bring a gun instead of hammer. Never a truer word, look at Jo Cox!

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Never a truer word, look at Jo Cox!


Bingo

Her stepping down, if caused by fear, is a dangerous precedent, and I hate that, if that's her reason. I took it as she is old as hell, and doesn't want to be minority leader again. I was happy about that reasoning.

If you agree with Pelosi's politics and way of handling herself or not, is irrelevant. She shouldn't have been targeted and made to fear for her and her family's lives.

eg Mitch McConnell is truly a human piece of garbage, someone who has no problem taking away people's rights and healthcare to feed his already uber rich friends just a little more. But I wouldn't want him attacked with a hammer and quitting politics out of fear. He should be voted out.

Suddenly you care about targeted threats? Funny how that wasn't a problem for you with the Supreme Court Justices.

Originally posted by cdtm
Suddenly you care about targeted threats? Funny how that wasn't a problem for you with the Supreme Court Justices.

You're lying again, I never said the SC justices should be targeted and I said the people who were protesting in front of their houses should face whatever legal penalties are appropriate.

Stop lying like a retard, okay?

Originally posted by Robtard
If you agree with Pelosi's politics and way of handling herself or not, is irrelevant. She shouldn't have been targeted and made to fear for her and her family's lives.

eg Mitch McConnell is truly a human piece of garbage, someone who has no problem taking away people's rights and healthcare to feed his already uber rich friends just a little more. But I wouldn't want him attacked with a hammer and quitting politics out of fear. He should be voted out.

What do you expect from him? He just voted against interracial marriage, and he is in one. He is human garbage.

7qOPcjfYds4

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
What do you expect from him? He just voted against interracial marriage, and he is in one. He is human garbage.

Nothing deplorable out of Rightist surprises me anymore. It's because he knows he has the power and influence to keep him and his beard of a wife's marriage safe.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
She is third in line to the presidency, she should have Secret Service protection.


But Jo Cox wasnt, and had no protection, and was brutally murdered in public just for the side of a debate she was on. For campaigning on one harmless issue.

Hence my point, its an extreme comparison.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
What do you expect from him? He just voted against interracial marriage, and he is in one. He is human garbage. what, explain!

McConnell voted against a bill that protected interracial marriage rights, despite his wife being of Chinese ancestry and him being a White man.

These Rightist are bigots, except towards Asian women. We saw it here.

Originally posted by Robtard
McConnell voted against a bill that protected interracial marriage rights, despite his wife being of Chinese ancestry and him being a White man.

These Rightist are bigots, except towards Asian women. We saw it here. This is simply mental.