Now, this may all be very necessary- but what do we think about the power being exercised here? Remember, this is a man who has not been convicted of anything. Can we start deeming people sexual risks without any convictions?
__________________
"We've got maybe seconds before Darth Rosenberg grinds everybody into Jawa burgers and not one of you buds has the midi-chlorians to stop her!"
"You've never had any TINY bit of sex, have you?"
BtVS
Last edited by Ushgarak on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 06:48 PM
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
This seems ridiculous and ineffective even if he was convicted of a crime. That apparently he was found not guilty and still has to do that seems like an severe abuse of power, and something the government should not have the power to do.
Re: Man ordered to tell police if he plans to have sex
Okay, first of all, teehee.
Secondly, why does the UK seem like it is stepping back into the middle ages, lately? Like...as of the last 10 years, they have regressed quite severely.
Well, they are done by magistrates, not government, and it;s all on a local level.
I'd be interested to know how much effort goes into this. I could draw an equivalence to mental health issus- if the right people deem a man a danger to others, he can be restricted without conviction. If the same sort of standard is applied here, then these might be ok.
I just don't want it to be the police saying 'this guy may be a problem'.
__________________
"We've got maybe seconds before Darth Rosenberg grinds everybody into Jawa burgers and not one of you buds has the midi-chlorians to stop her!"
It's always heartwarming to know the USA does not hold a monopoly on justice systems that need a complete and utter overhaul.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
KMC Community Forums
Jan 22nd, 2016 06:40 PM
