The actual political ads purchased by Russians

Here they are:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/01/us/politics/russia-2016-election-facebook.html

Some are pro-Bernie Sanders.

Some are pro-LGBT. Some where anti-Trump. Many were anti-Hillary. Many were xenophobic or border protection things.

All in all...seems like they were significantly left-leaning. So what's the problem, again? I thought these things were all about promoting Trump and shitting on Hillary. I thought I was supposed to be angry and have a pitch-fork ready. Why are the leftists buttmad, again?

The problem is.....lol f*ck if I know anymore. These imbeciles will whine over anything if they can try to imply it wasn't Clintons fault she lost.

Meanwhile, ACTUAL election interference by the Dems, and my topic about it has no responses from the usual suspects here.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f11/t647367.html

Weird.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Here they are:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/01/us/politics/russia-2016-election-facebook.html

Some are pro-Bernie Sanders.

Some are pro-LGBT. Some where anti-Trump. Many were anti-Hillary. Many were xenophobic or border protection things.

All in all...seems like they were significantly left-leaning. So what's the problem, again? I thought these things were all about promoting Trump and shitting on Hillary. I thought I was supposed to be angry and have a pitch-fork ready. Why are the leftists buttmad, again?

Sounds like something a partisan righty of a site would say, like....

....the new york... oh.

Never mind.

First of all....Da DUUUUDE M0N

were = past tense of are
where = question of here, there etc.

Please be correct with the english language, you oklahoma hick.

As for shitting on Hillary, I still respect her. She put Bernie in his place. Good for her, imo.

^ This seems pretty excessive Fox. WTF dude?
Attack the argument, not the person.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
First of all....Da DUUUUDE M0N

were = past tense of are
where = question of here, there etc.

Please be correct with the english language, you oklahoma hick.

As for shitting on Hillary, I still respect her. She put Bernie in his place. Good for her, imo.

Actually, I respect her as well. Her and the DNC flat out interfering in our election(remember how this used to be a bad thing?) to push Bernie out had a ripple effect that put Trump in the WH. Trump's victory exposed leftists for their true colors, giving us tons of hilarious footage and all around vaporizing any moral high ground they might of been delusional enough to think they still had.

Thanks Hilary, I mean it. You did good, real good. Your sense of entitlement helped this country avoid you.

Originally posted by socool8520
^ This seems pretty excessive Fox. WTF dude?
Attack the argument, not the person.

Originally posted by Surtur
Actually, I respect her as well. Her and the DNC flat out interfering in our election(remember how this used to be a bad thing?) to push Bernie out had a ripple effect that put Trump in the WH. Trump's victory exposed leftists for their true colors, giving us tons of hilarious footage and all around vaporizing any moral high ground they might of been delusional enough to think they still had.

Thanks Hilary, I mean it. You did good, real good. Your sense of entitlement helped this country avoid you.

Seriously.

Lol she didn't put a lot of effort to put a woman into office. She did a lot of effort to put herself into office. It's because she felt it was owed to her.

I also respect her for the work she put in, especially in Wisconsin. That was top notch stuff, agreed?

If you want to imply she is some overall champion of women, lol, yeah and Michael Moore is a champion of the Atkins diet. Remember: gay marriage(which includes females, as in lesbians) was wrong until it was to her advantage. Remember: women have the right to be believed, unless it's her husband being accused.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
I'm not attacking him, he just should use the correct word, is all....

A simple, hey bro, you should have used were instead of where would have sufficed. That was over-the-top. It could have been as simple as an auto correct error or something. people really have to learn to tone it down a notch.

Originally posted by socool8520
A simple, hey bro, you should have used were instead of where would have sufficed. That was over-the-top. It could have been as simple as an auto correct error or something. people really have to learn to tone it down a notch.

He is stressed, the recent terror attack in NYC reminded him in the UK they are due for their monthly Islamic terror incident soon most probably.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol she didn't put a lot of effort to put a woman into office. She did a lot of effort to put herself into office. It's because she felt it was owed to her.

I also respect her for the work she put in, especially in Wisconsin. That was top notch stuff, agreed?

If you want to imply she is some overall champion of women, lol, yeah and Michael Moore is a champion of the Atkins diet. Remember: gay marriage(which includes females, as in lesbians) was wrong until it was to her advantage. Remember: women have the right to be believed, unless it's her husband being accused.

Originally posted by socool8520
A simple, hey bro, you should have used were instead of where would have sufficed. That was over-the-top. It could have been as simple as an auto correct error or something. people really have to learn to tone it down a notch.

Lol well I don't hate her, it's about how you phrase things. If you said she worked hard...for herself, bingo was his name-o.

For women? Nope lol. She worked hard for her. Nothing wrong with that, but spades need to be called spades. Depicting her as an overall champion for women is just comedy though. In the same way Trump is a champion for illegal immigrants.

They look more pro-Trump and anti-Clinton to me. One actually equated a win for Clinton being a win for Satan.

But the question still remains. Why is Russia meddling in our election in the first place? It should not be.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol well I don't hate her, it's about how you phrase things. If you said she worked hard...for herself, bingo was his name-o.

For women? Nope lol. She worked hard for her. Nothing wrong with that, but spades need to be called spades.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
First of all....Da DUUUUDE M0N

were = past tense of are
where = question of here, there etc.

Please be correct with the english language, you oklahoma hick.

As for shitting on Hillary, I still respect her. She put Bernie in his place. Good for her, imo.

Clearly a typo. But we've been down this avenue before: I started correcting all the grammatical and spelling mistakes you made and you killed the "game." I think you forgot about that.

But we can go again and I start correcting all of your posts.
For example:

Oklahoma is a proper noun: capitalize it you uneducated chav-swine.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
Well, she is a woman. Surely she put herself as a role model for women, whether you think it was bad or good, she did work for women......

Okay, but I'm speaking to motivations lol. She was motivated not because "I just wanna see females doing well". She felt entitled to it and was willing to use the "first female president thing" to exploit it.

She did portray herself as that. What I'm saying if the reality was Hilary just cared about Hilary. There is nothing wrong with that, it's just not true to say she was working for women as a whole. She didn't decide to throw her weight behind a non-toxic female candidate, lol.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
Bullshit. This is my style. Don't hate.

Cool, but it should come as no surprise to you when people begin to troll/bash you.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
They look more pro-Trump and anti-Clinton to me. One actually equated a win for Clinton being a win for Satan.

But the question still remains. Why is Russia meddling in our election in the first place? It should not be.

This might be a strange question, but: do you think there is any group(anywhere) where it is OKAY for them to meddle in a US election?

Like, the DNC interfered as well. Do they have more of a right to interfere in our elections? Because I don't think anyone, I don't care where you are from or what country, has that right.

And yet...if social media ads are interference, what would we label the utter hate-fest some of our media spewed out against certain candidates? Is that okay? Is there some "you live here so you can interfere" thing? Like, I can hit my baby brother, but you can't?

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
They look more pro-Trump and anti-Clinton to me. One actually equated a win for Clinton being a win for Satan.

But the question still remains. Why is Russia meddling in our election in the first place? It should not be.

Well, it would be a bit hypocritical of us to be outraged over this when we do the same thing to other countries. These two were trying to destroy each other with or without Russia's help. Just because they were Russian doesn't make it any more detestable imo.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
They look more pro-Trump and anti-Clinton to me. One actually equated a win for Clinton being a win for Satan.

But the question still remains. Why is Russia meddling in our election in the first place? It should not be.

If a country like Qatar can buy ads lobbying against a blockade or whatever on our own television networks, then why shouldn't Russia be able to buy ads on Facebook?

Other countries buy ads and put out propaganda all the time.