 |
Wolfie
Keep on howling!
 Gender: Male
Location: California |
Is three the magic number?
There are some series that warrant sequels and some that should be left alone after the first.
At a possible franchise, a lot of people I talk to say the series should end at #3. So I ask, why is three the magic number?
Hell, even the I Know What You Did Last Summer crapped out another sequel this year just to get the third movie out there.
Is it merely to get the nice "trilogy" title? Why is four movies too many and three is just right?
I hope this makes sense.
__________________
|
Oct 24th, 2006 10:18 PM |
|
|
| |
|
Dusty
Senior Member
Gender: Male
Location: The United States. I <3 U |
There are (usually) 3 parts of a movie. So why shouldn't there be 3 parts of a series?
|
|
Oct 24th, 2006 11:34 PM |
|
|
| |
|
Wolfie
Keep on howling!
Gender: Male
Location: California |
A well-planned trilogy, sure. But the Terminator trilogy isn't in the same structure. They're just sequels, made because the previous was so big.
__________________
|
|
Oct 25th, 2006 06:45 AM |
|
|
| |
|
Impediment
Endless
 Gender: Male
Location: The Dreaming Moderator |
Just look what happened with Robocop. Need I say more?
__________________
“Dreams shape the world."
|
|
Oct 25th, 2006 06:53 AM |
|
|
| |
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
Text-only version |
|
|
KMC Community Forums
