Though in my "real" views on [Legends] Star Wars tiers I put the ancients generally below modern characters, I try to be reasonable and objective about it - I've flirted with the idea of placing Exar Kun above Vader from his spirit feats, and do consider some of their more impressive feats and accolades, such as Darth Jadus holding together part of a dreadnaught.
The moderns being more powerful overall seems to be accurate, both thematically and from the direct evidence present. Directly, we know that Sidious is canonically the most powerful sith lord of all time, and Yoda the most powerful Jedi Master - with Anakin potentially the most powerful Jedi [knight]. Barring entities, how many Sidious tier combatants were there in the course of the past 25,000 recorded years? One [Valkorion]? And no Jedi was even remotely on his level - or really, on the level of any of the ancient sith when they were alive. And yet in about a century, there are at least four on Sidious's tier, and over a dozen who match him in potential - the numbers speak for themselves. The modern Jedi and Sith must be stronger from powerscaling.
Thematically, I do think the whole idea of the prophecy of the Chosen One would make more sense if the Force conceived a being to face a particularly monstrous threat - .ie, Palpatine [and Plagueis earlier]. The concurrently running idea of the Prequel Trilogy in general is the decay and decline of the Republic and the Jedi - and one might think that a Lord of the Rings style power regression would fit in with this. I would argue the contrary. The point of the Prequels isn't that the Jedi fell because they were weak - they fell because they were blind, arrogant, and resistant to change. It would make it an even greater tragedy if the Jedi, who are themselves tragic heroes, were tall and mighty, and lost due to hubris, rather than just because they weren't as good at lifting things as they were before. It is, after all, a sort of exaggerated parallel to Rome / maybe western imperialism, and those civilizations in question had their flaws, but those flaws were amplified by their military might, not the reverse. And finally, you do want the primary two trilogies of the saga to represent some sort of climax, not a steady decay.
----------------
There are two personal reasons though.
Firstly, people as well as myself may be backlashing against the ludicrous ancient sith wank that once roamed the internet. People were declaring that Ragnos could beat Yoda and Sidious at once based on...based on...what, exactly? Literally the fact that they were ancient sith! Kas'im was once considered Dooku's superior as a swordsman, etc. This type of ludicrous worship of ancient characters with no feats or accolades to their name definitely invited some sort of backlash, and here it is. Here is people assuming that Darth Bane was almost as powerful as Palpatine, despite that literally being the opposite of the very basis of the rule of two.
Secondly, and somewhat more loosely, I don't like the "good old days" mentality. I don't like it politically, I look down on people who obsess about the superior morality of older generations or how things were better back then in everything - not just for the frequently veiled bigotry but also for the stupidity because, well, it just statistically isn't true. Things in real life have gotten drastically better in almost every category over time, and this is a claim that can be backed with empirical observation and basic assertions - rates of crime and war are at an all-time low, as are child poverty rates, democracy has spread further than it ever has, we have made incalculable strides in spreading human rights and equity, etc. And yet people still get the impression that the Jim-Crow era 1930s were "morally superior" and "the greatest generation", lol. Even common ideas like Millenials being "lazy" are clearly disabused by the evidence - the latest generation is more likely to work a job in college than their parents were. And I get the same sort of vibe from the ancient wankers. It sounds random and I'm sure it isn't literally true for many of said ancient wankers, but I the vibe's still there, for me, at least.
It's a space age civilization. Sure, I could see some ancient sith taking their secrets to the grave, or collections getting lost or destroyed over time, but as long as they can store data digitally, information would increase over time. Forms would be refined, new techniques would be invented, and that would be the net progress of society - and we see this for ourselves already in SW technology, and in innovations such as Windu's creating vaapad.
That's why the modern characters should be [and are] generally more powerful.
__________________ Join the new Star Wars vs. forum: Suspect Insight Forums (not url'd for spam prevention)
Last edited by The Ellimist on Jun 7th, 2016 at 02:35 AM
Actually well writen and coherent, interesting read
__________________
They are angry because they have been forced to recognize that their hour has arrived; that the time has come to surrender power to Shimrra and the new order."
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
If you're going to argue that a modern era character is more powerful though, it should be backed by evidence and not thematic bullshit because we aren't the Forcecast.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
Well, besides Plagueis. And while it's true that out of the Jedi we've seen from the Old Republic era, very few can even compete with Yoda in any facet, I'm not sure these are fair statements. Remember that there were Jedi like Fae Coven that were supposedly on Yoda's caliber, to some degree; and I doubt she was alone.
The modern era definitely has the strongest pool.
Lol is that what you were talking about when you linked the TOR brigade with political conservatism?
What about Karness Muur? Isn't he implied to be stronger than Darth Vader?
More importantly, Karness Muur was counted 'among' the strongest individuals of his era, let alone the entire TOR timeline. Therefore, it is realistic to assume that a large number of Darth Vader TIER (and/or superior) Force-users emerged [throughout] TOR timeline.
Why do you think that modern Sith continued to seek ancient sources of knowledge to hone their talents in the Dark Side? Even Palpatine?
Ancients are held in high regard within the lore, not just by fans. Both modern Sith and Jedi sought ancient sources of knowledge to hone their respective talents.
B/W Yoda is not a PT era Jedi either. He is officially identified as an ancient Jedi.
Champions of Light emerged to challenge Valkorion as well. This is how the Force works.
"The Force always strives for balance. The Emperor is an agent of darkness and destruction. It is inevitable that a champion of the light will one day rise to oppose him. I may be that champion." (Revan)
---
PT era Jedi were largely peacetime Jedi. They did not face pressures of galactic conflicts and did not prepare for such eventualities beforehand. Holistically speaking, PT era Jedi Order had little reason to push for perfection in understanding of the ways of the Force, combat and tactical skills.
Ancient era Jedi Masters adopted a largely skeptical stance of their peers because they understood that complacency would take over and erode the skills of the Jedi in the long-term. Even the likes of Revan were not above criticism.
On the other hand, PT era Jedi thought highly of each other, complementing each others skills. Ask them and you will get the impression that every PT era Jedi is a master swordsman and such. In reality, they were not doing each other any favor with this kind of mindset.
One Sith Lord survived—Darth Bane—and his vision for the Sith differed from that of his predecessors. He instituted a new doctrine: No longer would the followers of the dark side build empires or amass great armies of Force-users. There would be only two Sith at a time: a Master and an apprentice. From that time on, the Sith remained in hiding, biding their time and plotting their revenge, while the rest of the galaxy enjoyed an unprecedented era of peace, so long and strong that the Republic eventually dismantled its standing armies.
But while the Republic seemed strong, its institutions had begun to rot. Greedy corporations sought profits above all else and a corrupt Senate did nothing to stop them, until the corporations reduced many planets to raw materials for factories and entire species became subjects for exploitation. Individual Jedi continued to defend the Republic's citizens and obey the will of the Force, but the Jedi Order to which they answered grew increasingly out of touch. And a new Sith mastermind, Darth Sidious, at last saw a way to restore Sith domination over the galaxy and its inhabitants, and quietly worked to set in motion the revenge of the Sith …
Taken from Star Wars: The Old Republic: Revan (Author notes)
Registered: Aug 2014
Location: The balance of the Force
The entire idea of some eras having some blatant superiority over others, is pretty ridiculous. You can argue New Sith Wars being a dark age but given powerhouses like Bane, Zannah and Cognus came out of the ashes of the Brotherhood, that becomes quickly irrelevant. Contrary to popular moronic belief, the three of them are exceedingly powerful and Bane especially has legendary prowess.
The eras do not have inherent advantages over the other, almost all of them have extremely powerful Force users who can easily give each other deadly engagements.
This concept persists that those such as Sidious, Valkorion and Yoda are somehow untouchable Forces of nature, yet evidence to the contrary exists. They are and have been taken to the edge and even died facing characters of their respective eras that are not as impressive as those typically pitted against them.
Both concepts are simply illogical.
__________________
Within your furnace heart, you burn in your own flame. This is how it feels to be Anakin Skywalker.
I think modern characters being less powerful works much better from a narrative standpoint as doesn't leave one constantly scratching their heads as to why such power is never exerted in the OT or PT films. Instead, we can always fall back on the notion that much knowledge had been lost since the time of the ancients.
You can only show so much in films Kenshin. Plus it's not like anyone was thinking of all these bizarre abilities and such to include during the time of the films.
Last edited by Zenwolf on Jun 10th, 2016 at 12:22 PM
Actually, the knowledge the PT Jedi had was compared to that of the great library of Ossus:
-- Star Wars Fact File 46
Granted part of this stuff was destroyed by the Empire, but that's beside the point. As for the Sith, Bane already had all the knowledge of Sadow and Nadd, who are among the most powerful and knowledgeable ancient Sith at his disposal, and his successor collected more and more stuff in a thousand years, so it's not surprising that modern Jedi and Sith are above their older incarnations, at least when it comes to high and top tier people.