KMC Forums

 
  REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Already a member? Log-in!
 
 
Home » Star Wars » Star Wars: Literature & Expanded Universe » Why I favor modern characters


Why I favor modern characters
Started by: The Ellimist

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
The Ellimist
The Shadow

Registered: Apr 2016
Location: United States


 

Why I favor modern characters

Though in my "real" views on [Legends] Star Wars tiers I put the ancients generally below modern characters, I try to be reasonable and objective about it - I've flirted with the idea of placing Exar Kun above Vader from his spirit feats, and do consider some of their more impressive feats and accolades, such as Darth Jadus holding together part of a dreadnaught.

The moderns being more powerful overall seems to be accurate, both thematically and from the direct evidence present. Directly, we know that Sidious is canonically the most powerful sith lord of all time, and Yoda the most powerful Jedi Master - with Anakin potentially the most powerful Jedi [knight]. Barring entities, how many Sidious tier combatants were there in the course of the past 25,000 recorded years? One [Valkorion]? And no Jedi was even remotely on his level - or really, on the level of any of the ancient sith when they were alive. And yet in about a century, there are at least four on Sidious's tier, and over a dozen who match him in potential - the numbers speak for themselves. The modern Jedi and Sith must be stronger from powerscaling.

Thematically, I do think the whole idea of the prophecy of the Chosen One would make more sense if the Force conceived a being to face a particularly monstrous threat - .ie, Palpatine [and Plagueis earlier]. The concurrently running idea of the Prequel Trilogy in general is the decay and decline of the Republic and the Jedi - and one might think that a Lord of the Rings style power regression would fit in with this. I would argue the contrary. The point of the Prequels isn't that the Jedi fell because they were weak - they fell because they were blind, arrogant, and resistant to change. It would make it an even greater tragedy if the Jedi, who are themselves tragic heroes, were tall and mighty, and lost due to hubris, rather than just because they weren't as good at lifting things as they were before. It is, after all, a sort of exaggerated parallel to Rome / maybe western imperialism, and those civilizations in question had their flaws, but those flaws were amplified by their military might, not the reverse. And finally, you do want the primary two trilogies of the saga to represent some sort of climax, not a steady decay.

----------------

There are two personal reasons though.

Firstly, people as well as myself may be backlashing against the ludicrous ancient sith wank that once roamed the internet. People were declaring that Ragnos could beat Yoda and Sidious at once based on...based on...what, exactly? Literally the fact that they were ancient sith! Kas'im was once considered Dooku's superior as a swordsman, etc. This type of ludicrous worship of ancient characters with no feats or accolades to their name definitely invited some sort of backlash, and here it is. Here is people assuming that Darth Bane was almost as powerful as Palpatine, despite that literally being the opposite of the very basis of the rule of two.

Secondly, and somewhat more loosely, I don't like the "good old days" mentality. I don't like it politically, I look down on people who obsess about the superior morality of older generations or how things were better back then in everything - not just for the frequently veiled bigotry but also for the stupidity because, well, it just statistically isn't true. Things in real life have gotten drastically better in almost every category over time, and this is a claim that can be backed with empirical observation and basic assertions - rates of crime and war are at an all-time low, as are child poverty rates, democracy has spread further than it ever has, we have made incalculable strides in spreading human rights and equity, etc. And yet people still get the impression that the Jim-Crow era 1930s were "morally superior" and "the greatest generation", lol. Even common ideas like Millenials being "lazy" are clearly disabused by the evidence - the latest generation is more likely to work a job in college than their parents were. And I get the same sort of vibe from the ancient wankers. It sounds random and I'm sure it isn't literally true for many of said ancient wankers, but I the vibe's still there, for me, at least.

It's a space age civilization. Sure, I could see some ancient sith taking their secrets to the grave, or collections getting lost or destroyed over time, but as long as they can store data digitally, information would increase over time. Forms would be refined, new techniques would be invented, and that would be the net progress of society - and we see this for ourselves already in SW technology, and in innovations such as Windu's creating vaapad.

That's why the modern characters should be [and are] generally more powerful.


__________________
Join the new Star Wars vs. forum: Suspect Insight Forums (not url'd for spam prevention)

Last edited by The Ellimist on Jun 7th, 2016 at 02:35 AM

Old Post Jun 7th, 2016 02:24 AM
Click here to Send The Ellimist a Private Message Find more posts by The Ellimist Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
FreshestSlice
Eternal Commander

Registered: May 2014
Location:


 

Okay.

Old Post Jun 7th, 2016 02:39 AM
Click here to Send FreshestSlice a Private Message Find more posts by FreshestSlice Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
JKBart
Restricted

Registered: Aug 2015
Location: Poland

Account Restricted


 

Actually well writen and coherent, interesting read


__________________


They are angry because they have been forced to recognize that their hour has arrived; that the time has come to surrender power to Shimrra and the new order."

Old Post Jun 7th, 2016 02:43 AM
Click here to Send JKBart a Private Message Find more posts by JKBart Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Emperordmb
LSDMB

Registered: Mar 2014
Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan


 

If you're going to argue that a modern era character is more powerful though, it should be backed by evidence and not thematic bullshit because we aren't the Forcecast.


__________________

Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"

Old Post Jun 7th, 2016 02:49 AM
Click here to Send Emperordmb a Private Message Find more posts by Emperordmb Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Darth Abonis
Senior Member

Registered: Mar 2014
Location: Force Planet


 

Hard to tell. Is Leonardo da Vinci dumber than you because he doesn't know how to work an ipod? Its all perspective

Old Post Jun 7th, 2016 03:02 AM
Click here to Send Darth Abonis a Private Message Find more posts by Darth Abonis Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
quanchi112
Disney

Registered: May 2007
Location: Best company on the planet


 

Sidious and Yoda never impressed me canonically anyways. Weak.


__________________

Old Post Jun 7th, 2016 03:05 AM
Click here to Send quanchi112 a Private Message Find more posts by quanchi112 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
NewGuy01
perpetual

Registered: Jan 2013
Location: USA


 

Re: Why I favor modern characters

quote:
Barring entities, how many Sidious tier combatants were there in the course of the past 25,000 recorded years? One [Valkorion]? And no Jedi was even remotely on his level - or really, on the level of any of the ancient sith when they were alive.


Well, besides Plagueis. And while it's true that out of the Jedi we've seen from the Old Republic era, very few can even compete with Yoda in any facet, I'm not sure these are fair statements. Remember that there were Jedi like Fae Coven that were supposedly on Yoda's caliber, to some degree; and I doubt she was alone.

quote:
And yet in about a century, there are at least four on Sidious's tier, and over a dozen who match him in potential - the numbers speak for themselves. The modern Jedi and Sith must be stronger from power scaling.


thumb up The modern era definitely has the strongest pool.

quote:
*snip* And I get the same sort of vibe from the ancient wankers. It sounds random and I'm sure it isn't literally true for many of said ancient wankers, but I the vibe's still there, for me, at least.


Lol is that what you were talking about when you linked the TOR brigade with political conservatism? laughing out loud

Old Post Jun 7th, 2016 05:00 AM
Click here to Send NewGuy01 a Private Message Find more posts by NewGuy01 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Beniboybling
Worst Member

Registered: Jul 2014
Location: United Kingdom


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by JKBart
Actually well writen and coherent, interesting read


__________________

Old Post Jun 7th, 2016 07:12 AM
Click here to Send Beniboybling a Private Message Find more posts by Beniboybling Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
S_W_LeGenD
Senior Member

Registered: Nov 2006
Location: EARTH


 

Re: Why I favor modern characters

quote: (post)
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Though in my "real" views on [Legends] Star Wars tiers I put the ancients generally below modern characters, I try to be reasonable and objective about it - I've flirted with the idea of placing Exar Kun above Vader from his spirit feats, and do consider some of their more impressive feats and accolades, such as Darth Jadus holding together part of a dreadnaught.

What about Karness Muur? Isn't he implied to be stronger than Darth Vader?

More importantly, Karness Muur was counted 'among' the strongest individuals of his era, let alone the entire TOR timeline. Therefore, it is realistic to assume that a large number of Darth Vader TIER (and/or superior) Force-users emerged [throughout] TOR timeline.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by The Ellimist
The moderns being more powerful overall seems to be accurate, both thematically and from the direct evidence present. Directly, we know that Sidious is canonically the most powerful sith lord of all time, and Yoda the most powerful Jedi Master - with Anakin potentially the most powerful Jedi [knight]. Barring entities, how many Sidious tier combatants were there in the course of the past 25,000 recorded years? One [Valkorion]? And no Jedi was even remotely on his level - or really, on the level of any of the ancient sith when they were alive. And yet in about a century, there are at least four on Sidious's tier, and over a dozen who match him in potential - the numbers speak for themselves. The modern Jedi and Sith must be stronger from powerscaling.

Why do you think that modern Sith continued to seek ancient sources of knowledge to hone their talents in the Dark Side? Even Palpatine?

Ancients are held in high regard within the lore, not just by fans. Both modern Sith and Jedi sought ancient sources of knowledge to hone their respective talents.

B/W Yoda is not a PT era Jedi either. He is officially identified as an ancient Jedi.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Thematically, I do think the whole idea of the prophecy of the Chosen One would make more sense if the Force conceived a being to face a particularly monstrous threat - .ie, Palpatine [and Plagueis earlier]. The concurrently running idea of the Prequel Trilogy in general is the decay and decline of the Republic and the Jedi - and one might think that a Lord of the Rings style power regression would fit in with this. I would argue the contrary. The point of the Prequels isn't that the Jedi fell because they were weak - they fell because they were blind, arrogant, and resistant to change. It would make it an even greater tragedy if the Jedi, who are themselves tragic heroes, were tall and mighty, and lost due to hubris, rather than just because they weren't as good at lifting things as they were before. It is, after all, a sort of exaggerated parallel to Rome / maybe western imperialism, and those civilizations in question had their flaws, but those flaws were amplified by their military might, not the reverse. And finally, you do want the primary two trilogies of the saga to represent some sort of climax, not a steady decay.

Champions of Light emerged to challenge Valkorion as well. This is how the Force works.

"The Force always strives for balance. The Emperor is an agent of darkness and destruction. It is inevitable that a champion of the light will one day rise to oppose him. I may be that champion." (Revan)

---

PT era Jedi were largely peacetime Jedi. They did not face pressures of galactic conflicts and did not prepare for such eventualities beforehand. Holistically speaking, PT era Jedi Order had little reason to push for perfection in understanding of the ways of the Force, combat and tactical skills.

Ancient era Jedi Masters adopted a largely skeptical stance of their peers because they understood that complacency would take over and erode the skills of the Jedi in the long-term. Even the likes of Revan were not above criticism.

On the other hand, PT era Jedi thought highly of each other, complementing each others skills. Ask them and you will get the impression that every PT era Jedi is a master swordsman and such. In reality, they were not doing each other any favor with this kind of mindset.

One Sith Lord survived—Darth Bane—and his vision for the Sith differed from that of his predecessors. He instituted a new doctrine: No longer would the followers of the dark side build empires or amass great armies of Force-users. There would be only two Sith at a time: a Master and an apprentice. From that time on, the Sith remained in hiding, biding their time and plotting their revenge, while the rest of the galaxy enjoyed an unprecedented era of peace, so long and strong that the Republic eventually dismantled its standing armies.

But while the Republic seemed strong, its institutions had begun to rot. Greedy corporations sought profits above all else and a corrupt Senate did nothing to stop them, until the corporations reduced many planets to raw materials for factories and entire species became subjects for exploitation. Individual Jedi continued to defend the Republic's citizens and obey the will of the Force, but the Jedi Order to which they answered grew increasingly out of touch. And a new Sith mastermind, Darth Sidious, at last saw a way to restore Sith domination over the galaxy and its inhabitants, and quietly worked to set in motion the revenge of the Sith …


Taken from Star Wars: The Old Republic: Revan (Author notes)

Old Post Jun 7th, 2016 07:39 AM
Click here to Send S_W_LeGenD a Private Message Find more posts by S_W_LeGenD Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Beniboybling
Worst Member

Registered: Jul 2014
Location: United Kingdom


 

You're wrong about the Jedi becoming complacent Legend.
quote:
Revenge of the Sith novelisation

The Sith had changed. The Sith had grown, had adapted, had invested a thousand years' intensive study into every aspect of not only the Force but Jedi lore itself, in preparation for exactly this day. The Sith had remade themselves.

They had become new.

While the Jedi --

The Jedi had spent that same millennium training to refight the last war.
And most of the PT Jedi accolades come from objective sources. erm


__________________

Old Post Jun 7th, 2016 09:53 AM
Click here to Send Beniboybling a Private Message Find more posts by Beniboybling Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
AncientPower
The Chosen One

Registered: Aug 2014
Location: The balance of the Force


 

The entire idea of some eras having some blatant superiority over others, is pretty ridiculous. You can argue New Sith Wars being a dark age but given powerhouses like Bane, Zannah and Cognus came out of the ashes of the Brotherhood, that becomes quickly irrelevant. Contrary to popular moronic belief, the three of them are exceedingly powerful and Bane especially has legendary prowess.

The eras do not have inherent advantages over the other, almost all of them have extremely powerful Force users who can easily give each other deadly engagements.

This concept persists that those such as Sidious, Valkorion and Yoda are somehow untouchable Forces of nature, yet evidence to the contrary exists. They are and have been taken to the edge and even died facing characters of their respective eras that are not as impressive as those typically pitted against them.

Both concepts are simply illogical.


__________________

Within your furnace heart, you burn in your own flame. This is how it feels to be Anakin Skywalker.

Old Post Jun 7th, 2016 10:33 AM
Click here to Send AncientPower a Private Message Find more posts by AncientPower Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
MS Warehouse
Senior Member

Registered: May 2016
Location:


 

quote:
If you're going to argue that a modern era character is more powerful though, it should be backed by evidence and not thematic bullshit because we aren't the Forcecast.


quote:
okay


thumb up

Old Post Jun 7th, 2016 11:04 AM
Click here to Send MS Warehouse a Private Message Find more posts by MS Warehouse Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Jmanghan
Senior Member

Registered: Oct 2013
Location: Batman Land


 

Re: Why I favor modern characters

quote: (post)
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Though in my "real" views on [Legends] Star Wars tiers I put the ancients generally below modern characters, I try to be reasonable and objective about it - I've flirted with the idea of placing Exar Kun above Vader from his spirit feats, and do consider some of their more impressive feats and accolades, such as Darth Jadus holding together part of a dreadnaught.

The moderns being more powerful overall seems to be accurate, both thematically and from the direct evidence present. Directly, we know that Sidious is canonically the most powerful sith lord of all time, and Yoda the most powerful Jedi Master - with Anakin potentially the most powerful Jedi [knight]. Barring entities, how many Sidious tier combatants were there in the course of the past 25,000 recorded years? One [Valkorion]? And no Jedi was even remotely on his level - or really, on the level of any of the ancient sith when they were alive. And yet in about a century, there are at least four on Sidious's tier, and over a dozen who match him in potential - the numbers speak for themselves. The modern Jedi and Sith must be stronger from powerscaling.

Thematically, I do think the whole idea of the prophecy of the Chosen One would make more sense if the Force conceived a being to face a particularly monstrous threat - .ie, Palpatine [and Plagueis earlier]. The concurrently running idea of the Prequel Trilogy in general is the decay and decline of the Republic and the Jedi - and one might think that a Lord of the Rings style power regression would fit in with this. I would argue the contrary. The point of the Prequels isn't that the Jedi fell because they were weak - they fell because they were blind, arrogant, and resistant to change. It would make it an even greater tragedy if the Jedi, who are themselves tragic heroes, were tall and mighty, and lost due to hubris, rather than just because they weren't as good at lifting things as they were before. It is, after all, a sort of exaggerated parallel to Rome / maybe western imperialism, and those civilizations in question had their flaws, but those flaws were amplified by their military might, not the reverse. And finally, you do want the primary two trilogies of the saga to represent some sort of climax, not a steady decay.

----------------

There are two personal reasons though.

Firstly, people as well as myself may be backlashing against the ludicrous ancient sith wank that once roamed the internet. People were declaring that Ragnos could beat Yoda and Sidious at once based on...based on...what, exactly? Literally the fact that they were ancient sith! Kas'im was once considered Dooku's superior as a swordsman, etc. This type of ludicrous worship of ancient characters with no feats or accolades to their name definitely invited some sort of backlash, and here it is. Here is people assuming that Darth Bane was almost as powerful as Palpatine, despite that literally being the opposite of the very basis of the rule of two.

Secondly, and somewhat more loosely, I don't like the "good old days" mentality. I don't like it politically, I look down on people who obsess about the superior morality of older generations or how things were better back then in everything - not just for the frequently veiled bigotry but also for the stupidity because, well, it just statistically isn't true. Things in real life have gotten drastically better in almost every category over time, and this is a claim that can be backed with empirical observation and basic assertions - rates of crime and war are at an all-time low, as are child poverty rates, democracy has spread further than it ever has, we have made incalculable strides in spreading human rights and equity, etc. And yet people still get the impression that the Jim-Crow era 1930s were "morally superior" and "the greatest generation", lol. Even common ideas like Millenials being "lazy" are clearly disabused by the evidence - the latest generation is more likely to work a job in college than their parents were. And I get the same sort of vibe from the ancient wankers. It sounds random and I'm sure it isn't literally true for many of said ancient wankers, but I the vibe's still there, for me, at least.

It's a space age civilization. Sure, I could see some ancient sith taking their secrets to the grave, or collections getting lost or destroyed over time, but as long as they can store data digitally, information would increase over time. Forms would be refined, new techniques would be invented, and that would be the net progress of society - and we see this for ourselves already in SW technology, and in innovations such as Windu's creating vaapad.

That's why the modern characters should be [and are] generally more powerful.
To be fair, there aren't really many Sidious tier opponents in all of history.


__________________
Thanks Scribble!

Warrior of Light Respect Thread

Old Post Jun 7th, 2016 12:13 PM
Click here to Send Jmanghan a Private Message Find more posts by Jmanghan Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
cs_zoltan
Senior Member

Registered: Jul 2015
Location: Hungary


 

(please log in to view the image)


__________________


"You presume limits to our double standards. There are none." - Vitidiots

Old Post Jun 7th, 2016 12:18 PM
Click here to Send cs_zoltan a Private Message Find more posts by cs_zoltan Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
|King Joker|
Your Excellency

Registered: Nov 2014
Location: Transcendent


 

LMFAO


__________________



Old Post Jun 7th, 2016 05:05 PM
Click here to Send |King Joker| a Private Message Find more posts by |King Joker| Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Dark-Kenshin
Blocked

Registered: Feb 2006
Location: United States


 

I think modern characters being less powerful works much better from a narrative standpoint as doesn't leave one constantly scratching their heads as to why such power is never exerted in the OT or PT films. Instead, we can always fall back on the notion that much knowledge had been lost since the time of the ancients.

Old Post Jun 10th, 2016 06:59 AM
Click here to Send Dark-Kenshin a Private Message Find more posts by Dark-Kenshin Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Zenwolf
Senior Member

Registered: Dec 2013
Location: United States


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Dark-Kenshin
I think modern characters being less powerful works much better from a narrative standpoint as doesn't leave one constantly scratching their heads as to why such power is never exerted in the OT or PT films. Instead, we can always fall back on the notion that much knowledge had been lost since the time of the ancients.


You can only show so much in films Kenshin. Plus it's not like anyone was thinking of all these bizarre abilities and such to include during the time of the films.

Last edited by Zenwolf on Jun 10th, 2016 at 12:22 PM

Old Post Jun 10th, 2016 12:18 PM
Click here to Send Zenwolf a Private Message Find more posts by Zenwolf Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
ILS
Restricted

Registered: Oct 2014
Location: Korriban

Account Restricted


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Dark-Kenshin
I think modern characters being less powerful works much better from a narrative standpoint as doesn't leave one constantly scratching their heads as to why such power is never exerted in the OT or PT films. Instead, we can always fall back on the notion that much knowledge had been lost since the time of the ancients.
Or, Legends.


__________________

“The galaxy must experience the pain of death and the rapture of rebirth as I have. I will bring chaos. It is time for war.

Old Post Jun 10th, 2016 06:04 PM
Click here to Send ILS a Private Message Find more posts by ILS Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Nargaroth
Senior Member

Registered: Sep 2014
Location: Italy


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Dark-Kenshin
I think modern characters being less powerful works much better from a narrative standpoint as doesn't leave one constantly scratching their heads as to why such power is never exerted in the OT or PT films. Instead, we can always fall back on the notion that much knowledge had been lost since the time of the ancients.


Actually, the knowledge the PT Jedi had was compared to that of the great library of Ossus:

quote:
For a thousand generations, the Jedi worked hard to ensure that peace flourished throughout the galaxy. During that time, a number of repositories of Jedi knowledge developed, whose scope and sheer magnitude have become legendary. Of these, the library on the planet Ossus is perhaps the most infamous. Tragically, it was obliterated when the stars of the nearby Cron cluster were exploded by the weapon of the ancient Sith High Priest, Naga Sadow. What vast knowledge and wisdom was lost in the ensuing conflagration is now a matter for myths and stories to imagine In more recent times, the Archives at the Jedi Temple on Coruscant were similarly vast..


-- Star Wars Fact File 46

Granted part of this stuff was destroyed by the Empire, but that's beside the point. As for the Sith, Bane already had all the knowledge of Sadow and Nadd, who are among the most powerful and knowledgeable ancient Sith at his disposal, and his successor collected more and more stuff in a thousand years, so it's not surprising that modern Jedi and Sith are above their older incarnations, at least when it comes to high and top tier people.


__________________
Darth Vader Respect Thread (Part 1) ¦ Darth Vader Respect Thread (Part 2) ¦

Darth Vader Respect Thread (Part 3)
--
¦ Other Respect Threads ¦

Last edited by Nargaroth on Jun 10th, 2016 at 06:53 PM

Old Post Jun 10th, 2016 06:41 PM
Click here to Send Nargaroth a Private Message Find more posts by Nargaroth Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
MS Warehouse
Senior Member

Registered: May 2016
Location:


 

Much more ancient sith knowledge was lost than could ever be gained by Bane and his sith.

Old Post Jun 10th, 2016 07:24 PM
Click here to Send MS Warehouse a Private Message Find more posts by MS Warehouse Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 03:10 PM.
Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< Contact Us - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Forum powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.