As far as I'm concerned, there are only 2 Bonds, Moore and Connery. They both have there good points, but in the end I have to give it to Moore. I think he is the more convincing of the 2. The rest are wannabe's.
exactly,very well said. Moore and Connery are the only true James Bonds to ever grace the screen,the others are wannabe's who ruined his imiage.Great to see someone else out there who sees the truth on this issue.
[QUOTE=12629613]Originally posted by Zoom Moore has always been my favourite. I like Connery as well, but I grew up watching Moore and that is why he is my fav. [/QUOTE
yeah same here.I liked Connery and enjoyed watching him as well but since I grew up with Roger Moore,he was the one I really liked the best of the two.I liked his sarcasm remarks he always made.He was really funny.
The people who think that Brosnan was the best and people have come on here before and said that,or think he was second best after Connery,are people who cant spot horrible acting when its right there in front of them. Brosnan just plain sucked.
I grew with Moore but still like Connery more, and Brosnan was good at least he had humor just like the first 2. but Craig's movies have next to no humor. They have to bring back Q and the gadgets
Gender: Male Location: Outside Olivia Wilde's house.
I cannot seperate Connery and Moore. For me they were both perfect in the role and will always be the two people I imagine when thinking about James Bond.
yeah putting Craig and Lazenby ahead of Connery and Moore is definetely a list thats screwed up. Craig is so miscast as Bond its a joke,Bond doesnt have a receding hairline like Craig does. I like your list except the only change I would make is switch Craig and Brosnan around putting Craig at 3 and Brosnan at 6 cause Craig is a much better actor.Its not Craigs fault that the movies are serious,he could do comedy if they let him,its just they decided to go into a serious direction when Craig came on.
I have given it a great deal of thought and have decided that Connery is the best Bond. You just cannot beat the introduction scene in Dr.No. For me it sets the standards for all the other Bonds.
I put Moore at the bottom because his Bond strayed further than any of the other's from Flemming's, otherwise he had a lot of entertianment value albeit while being unconvincing as a super sleuth.
Lazenby and Dalton were closer to Flemming's Bond than the others (it's too bad they only have 3 films between them). Craig isn't far off from the original himself but his films have been plagued by a post DAnD funk.
__________________
Iboga chose not to fight, to allow himself to evolve. He had the wisdom to abandon the actions of war when he knew they would no longer serve him.
yeah I totally agree and could not have said it better myself. Like you said,they were both perfect in the role and they will also always be the two people I imagine when thinking about James Bond as well.The others are just wanna be imposters.
Connery is in my opinion the true James Bond. Stylish, sophisticated, and very prim. The new Bond is far to gritty, doesn't have the same type of charm and suave as Connery had.
__________________ "Every daring attempt to make a great change in existing conditions, every lofty vision of new possibilities for the human race, has been labeled Utopian."
And doesn't have the humor either.
I don't understand they get a wonderful actor (John Clesse) to replace the orginal Q and only use him in 2 movies???
WTF
Allankles and Batman 136's list is also really screwed up putting Moore at the bottom when like myself and someone else said,Connery AND Moore were both perfect in their roles as Bond.
their just upset that Connery left even though they will never admit that,Bond fans like them never do.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Apr 19th, 2010 at 04:59 PM
I liked them all. Too bad that almost every Brosnan Bond sucked, that Moore had some that sucked hardcore too, that Lazenby had only one movie, and that Craig play it too much "badass".