On one side, we have marvels berserker balls-to-the-wall fighters: Wolverine , Sabretooth & Wildchild
On the other side we have DC’s/Marvel finest tactical fighters: Batman , Captain America (not ultimate) & Black Panther .
The berserkers have their claws & teeth, the thinkers have their standard weapons. Would the thinkers be able to mount a decent offense/defense before the animals close in and start shredding(less than a minute)? Who would most likely fight who and in the end who would be left standing?in the end who would be left standing?
Last edited by Robtard on Jun 1st, 2006 at 04:13 PM
Berserker can mean to lose control and guess what, feral can mean to lose control and that's what I meant by saying 'berserker'. I didn't actually mean the technical term for berserker as being a 'Scandinavian warrior' which by the way, wolverine isn't. Relax bub.
Last edited by Robtard on Jun 1st, 2006 at 04:21 PM
I tend to agree with you, but how are those three going to survive long enough to do it against the healing factor/claws crew? I'm split 50-50 on this.
feral on the other hand makes you go almost totally animal taking away from combat tactics and skills. There a huge differences between berserker and feral.
Tactitions win this, wheres Deathstroke? Cap can hold his own againt Wolvie or Sabes I would assume. BP has antimetal claws. Bats takes down wildchild. Add Reed Richards, Iron Man, and Deathstroke to that team and they would be unstoppable.
fe·ral Audio pronunciation of "feral" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (fîrl, fr-)
adj.
1.
1. Existing in a wild or untamed state.
2. Having returned to an untamed state from domestication.
2. Of or suggestive of a wild animal; savage: a feral grin.
ber·serk Audio pronunciation of "berserk" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (br-sûrk, -zûrk, b-)
adj.
1. Destructively or frenetically violent: a berserk worker who started smashing all the windows.
2. Mentally or emotionally upset; deranged: berserk with grief.
3. Informal. Unrestrained, as with enthusiasm or appetite; wild: berserk over chocolates.
Jesus....
And the tacticians would be able to mount an appropiate defense, and offensive against these three. Not EVERY time, but probably 5 or 6 out of 10. Especially with Batman's and Captain America's Jobber auras.
I agree with the almost 50-50... Black Panther has the best chance of taking any of the three down, I'm just not 100% sure Capt or Bats would be able to.
and thanks for posting the definitions... Not that it should of been an issue to begin with, but waddayaknow.
true the deffinitions are the similar, but not how they are portrayed in comics. Also you I have read books based on beserkers and they are quite different in books as well.
feral is savages.
berskers in book and comics are fighters who abilites are all set to max and they retain all there tactional skills and fighting ability.
Gender: Male Location: I'm not giving my name to a machine
Wolverine has books now? I've always heard the term used for a status condition where a person gains power and speed at the cost of fighting recklessly and thus taking more damage due to their blinding rage/inability to think. What filthy mangas or whatever have you been reading that shows otherwise?
__________________ Originally posted by -Pr- a great big penis.
KMC Community Forums
Jun 1st, 2006 04:10 PM
