__________________ Quotes from Hia8:
"I claimed that the science is sometimes faulty."
"You don't understand. This is fiction. That means none of this stuff really happened."
"There is no writer to purposely ignore a character's natural ability just because it suits the story."
"in some cases because the writer knows that Character A will dominate Character B easily and refuses to allow this to happen for the sake of the story."
Last edited by rotiart on Mar 19th, 2012 at 09:50 PM
Newt wasn't on my list for a reason. No one mentioned him except for you.
__________________ Quotes from Hia8:
"I claimed that the science is sometimes faulty."
"You don't understand. This is fiction. That means none of this stuff really happened."
"There is no writer to purposely ignore a character's natural ability just because it suits the story."
"in some cases because the writer knows that Character A will dominate Character B easily and refuses to allow this to happen for the sake of the story."
Bush. So by the time he finishes cleaning up his mess Americans may go ahead and vote the republicans back in and we can start all over again. First they would put more taxes on the poor and middle class citizens, and allow the rich to grow richer by encouraging the outsourcing of jobs again. Wow Obama is such a bad guy, after all why should people have free health care?
Thanos is a pretty humble dude. He knows where he stands.
I'd say Lex Luthor. Doom is good at it to, but he gots his moments of insight. Sometimes.
Also, c'mon dude. Obama is by far the best president you got in twelve years. Are you telling us that you think that Bush was better at the job that him? Or that there's someone better for it in the bunch of nutjobs that runs for the GOP leadership?
How's the koolaid over there in Jersey? Time for a history lesson. Reagan inheritted a worse economy than Obama did. He didnt piss and moan about it, or keep blaming his predeccessor. He got to work and fixxed it. Why? Because a real leader produces results not excuses. Bush's tax cuts generated more revenues for the government than ever before. The tax cuts didn't tank the economy the housing bubble burst, that is what started the collapse. Guess who decided that not being able to afford a home shouldn't keep people from getting home loans? Here's a hint, it rhymes with Carter. Secondly Obama enjoyed an unbeatable majority in both houses of Congress for the first two years as president yet things got worse, how is that not his/their fault. Finally if free healthcare is so great why are deathrates from common cancers, such as breast and prostate, as much as 50% higher in countries with "free" healcare? Why do millions of Canadians and Europeans chose to come here and pay for treatment every year, rather than stay home and get "free" treatment. Why do people in Canada and Europe have to wait an average of six months for a hip replacement?
Last edited by Brockalizer on Mar 20th, 2012 at 01:51 AM
FTR Obummercare isn't even close to being free... It's being paid by the US workers tax dollars.
So for those that aren't working, whether they're acually trying to work and can't find work or if they're just the raping, murdering, theiving, shit where they stand freeloaders also known as OWSers that aren't even trying to find a job are getting it from the people that are busting their hump every day.
That sounds fair right...?
Attachment: barack-obama.jpg
This has been downloaded 76 time(s).
hard to get anything done when Republican party let him win by putting someone like Palin up for vice... They knew the situation was unwinnable and it is a sad day when Sarah Palin is better PR than dealing with winning the Presidency. Combined with the fact that the Republican Party pulls stupid crap like trying to stop a bill based on how many pages it is rather than content... I mean really... Congress pulling a TLDR... also complaining about pork barrel spending ignoring the fact that all pork barrel spending is, is the bribe inserted for opposing senators and congressmen to vote for a bill. So... they don't want to vote for a bill because it has too much excess spending which they put in there because they said it would buy their vote??? Not much sense, but then again this is the same group of people who believe the trickle down theory works in a global economy where few other countries are regulating their business practices... I mean god forbid listening to people who aren't multimillionaire/billionaires who studied macroeconomics and don't stand to gain from putting in a bad policy.
KMC Community Forums
Mar 19th, 2012 07:21 PM
Attachment: 
