.........So?The topic was specifically asking which FEAT is more impressive. It has nothing to do with Marvel's characters. Unless you really want making an argument that Thor is stronger than any living being in marvel( Which we all know that it is not true)
Thor's feat is that he is swinging a hammer heavier than a world, heavier than anything that has ever been moved by any living being.
Superman's feat is that he is breaking 'unbreakable' chains which are used to haul stars.
So Superman's is more hyperbole (because they are obviously not unbreakable), and is also better (because the chains are used for hauling stars between galaxies, yet he broke them).
I disagree, thor's feat is way way more hyperbole. This is why i wanted Alberto define hyperbole. I'm going with embellishment, exaggeration.
We can assume that the chains were never broken by anyone before superman broke them or the guy wouldn't have called them unbreakable.
The hammer had to be forged so it was moved at one point prior, even lifted so that's a big exaggeration, even an outright lie. It's the enchantment that gives Mjolnir it's "weight". The enchantment can make the hammer weigh more than a world for the unworthy, but for thor its as easy as lifting a regular hammer because he's worthy. So it's a regular feat that could have been performed by any worthy being and because of this, its a huge exaggeration to make OKT appear almighty. Much bigger hyperbole than the unbreakable chains.
this is true but I doubt dwarves are gonna use cranes and lifts. Likely hammer it with an anvil. Also it was probably lifted before the enchantment and possible by Odin when he enchanted it.
Also called Thor almighty and we know he’s not.
KMC Community Forums
Mar 31st, 2020 11:58 PM
