Yoda could have defeated Sidious is he wasn't a coward and had to throw platforms at him. Sidious did that because he knew he can't take Yoda. Sidious tried to run at the beginning.
Zodiac. Sidious and Yoda in direct combat. Yoda is superior to Palpatine. But not by leagues. Yoda would never own Palpatine. Nor vice versa. Palpatine was smart. He did what he could to get the advantage.
Registered: May 2005
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
in direct combay yoda barely wins, if there's advantages to be gained through height or things like that than palpy wins or they tie if it's only a minor advantage.
Adding maul is just overkill, well maybe sidious could turn him...
__________________ The whole world trembles in fear before my awesome unholy army of garden gnomes soon we will rule the world and from there...home depot!!!
Yoda could not defeat Darth Sidious. Sidious is the most powerful duelist with a lightsaber. He is much too powerful, if Obi-Wan destroyed Darth Maul easily than Sidious would take on his apprentice easily. But he would get tired, i believe Yoda could take him on easily. The duo would win!
Registered: May 2005
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
sigh, "learned nothing have you." Sidious is not the greatest duelist, tulak hord was the greatest sith duelist ever it's a known fact, Revan was much more powerful,kreia was more powerful,ragnos,sadow and freedon were more powerful sidious is an average sith lord, his skill wasn't in combat it was in manipulation please learn your facts.
__________________ The whole world trembles in fear before my awesome unholy army of garden gnomes soon we will rule the world and from there...home depot!!!
When you are talking about that quote you are dealing with the wrong things..
Obi Wan did not defeat Maul easily... It could hardly be attributed to him if you ask me.
Sidious is not far to powerful he showed nothing that would make him more powerful then people that controlled or blew up stars.
Yoda could defeat Sidious didn't you see the fight, did you see a clear winner during the fight? Neither did I it could go either way. With Maul it becomes an overkill.
Registered: May 2005
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
Lets say even if sidious is a little better (which i personally don't think he is as yoda threw everything he attacked him with back at his face.) then add maul and sids is screwed as maul is pretty badass with a saber.
__________________ The whole world trembles in fear before my awesome unholy army of garden gnomes soon we will rule the world and from there...home depot!!!
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: The Dark Side of the Force
Palpy's dead
__________________
"Beneath this mask there is more than flesh. Beneath this mask there is an idea, Mr. Creedy, and ideas are bulletproof." (Thanks TRiNiTYfemi for the sig!)
HA! To even ask this question makes me chuckle. Maul AND Yoda against Palpatine? MO baby. (MO= Major Overkill) I mean, Palpatine barely won against Yoda, when a third of the time they didn't even come into close combat. I'm thinking if Maul was a bit stronger and faster, he could take on Palpy as well. When you put Yoda and Maul together, it's just two whirlwinds of red and green.
Jun 25th, 2005 04:41 AM
