There's no evidence of Zannah being very powerful, especially more than Malak. If he DOES make it past Sion, I see him dying at either Dooku or Sidious.
oh ok Lightsnake and quantify this Jedi's power against someone like Malak? Oh that's right you can't, so the argument of "omgz zannah killed a jedi at 10" doesn't work.
Double standards much? Aren't you the guy who is always going on about how Malak, even without the SF = Dooku? Quantify that, moron. The fact that Zannah was instinctively able to do those things is incredible. I'd say she has the potential to be the most powerful female jedi ever (excluding the Skywalkers) - more powerful than Kreia, Nomi, Bastilla etc.
Ok, how many other Sith could kill experienced Jedi Knights fighting at Ruusan of all places at the age of ten INSTINCTIVELY?
There's nothing saying Malak could beat Zannah who was an extremely strong Dark Side by all accounts
1. It has been argued that Malak=Dooku without the SF.
2. There is sufficient evidence(that i've provided), that shows the SF increases your dark side power considerably. And even if it increased Malak's power in the smallest of ways, he was already on par with Dooku, so any increase would put him above Dooku. Good try Nebaris, i'm glad you fully understand what double standards are.
3. You're an idiot. Because she instinctively force crushed an average jedi at 10, she has the potential to become the most powerful female jedi/sith ever? Are you feeling stupid today? I guess Anakin>the entire star wars galaxy because he was the only human kid who could pod race, using the force.
Actually you have Malak's power, which is more evident than Zannah's 1 feat. So unless you have evidence of anything else Zannah did, you have no argument. "But omgz Zannah force crushed someone at 10 she must be the most powerful jedi/sith ever!". No argument lightsnake.
Ok, why don't we prove Malak could best her in her prime state after training with Bane? Keep in mind Zannah, as a kid, could blow someone's hand off without even trying or training.
Prove he can best her? Considering she's an unknown and Malak was 2nd in an order of thousands of Jedi and Sith? Yea it's safe to go with Malak taking her out.
And Zannah's future, according to Laa was to be among the greatest, so?
We know she became an expert saber fighter, we know she could blow limbs off at will several...what, hours, after meeting Bane? And oh, yeah, kill one of the top Jedi fighting at Ruusan in anger alone.
It's pretty safe to go with Zannah actually. When we see Malak telekenetically lift an experienced Jedi up, snap every bone in his bone and throw him back with NO training whatsoever at the age of 10 BEFORE finding a master in the number one Sith in an order of ten thousand as of Ruusan, then we can go with Malak.
Oh I forgot, because Laa stated her personal opinion, this is more definitive than Malak's war on the Jedi. Great logic lightsnake. And who exactly were the top Jedi at Ruusan? Oh that's right, you don't know. Your logic is ridiculous. Because she did a force crush at 10, she is better than Malak? In that case Naga Sadow>the whole SW galaxy because he can win wars with his illusions. Once again, facts>your retarded logic(if you can call it that).
1.) It's also been argued Exar Kun could take out the entire PT Council alone, lol. What are you trying to get at really? I don't see what exactly suggests Malak is on par with Dooku. Admittedly, I've stated in the past he is - of course, as it only suited my argument at the time.
2.) Proof he was on par with Dooku?
3.) Definitely a faulty comparison. Zannah demonstrated an actually impressive display of the Force, Anakin used the Force to help guide him or whatever. How's that even compare? Maybe if he would've used the Force to blow up twenty other pod racers. And when does it it say he's the only human kid who could pod race using the Force?
__________________
"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent." - Sagacious Jedi Master Qui-Gon Jinn.
Well Malak was actually a Jedi at the age of 10 so snapping every bone in a soldiers body would be out of the question...
But if you are basing your argument on this one feat, it seems a little unfair to give it to Zannah, considering everything Malak was capable of doing... Perhaps when we see what Zannah is ACTUALLY capable of doing we can come to a conclusion on who wins.
1. I guess the fact that he was #2 behind Revan out of thousands of Jedi/Sith. He and Revan were both lightsaber prodigies. I would believe that puts him in a category with Dooku.
2. Proof that Dooku was on par or superior to Malak? This proof thing goes both ways. I put him in a league with Dooku and Revan in a league with Yoda and Mace.
3. I couldn't think of anything better due to the ridiculous nature of the argument. If you're going to put Zannah above Malak based on one feat, then you've formed a terrible argument.
Sep 11th, 2006 11:36 PM
