Ashoka beat Maul way back, she's only gotten better since then, Baylan beat her once and she outsmarted him the second fight, implication being she either can't beat him or it'll take one huge effort to do so... at this point id say he beats Maul
Guys no offense but I can’t believe you’re already putting Baylan above Maul based on a statement which is surely not objective (otherwise using this logic AotC Dooku>Yoda). Baylan is the same guy who believes Shin can kill both Ezra and Sabine at the same time, while in reality she couldn’t even best an unarmed Ezra and would have been done for if the night troopers didn’t intervene. On the other hand you have a guy who was chosen by Sidious himself to be his apprentice, who has dueled evenly with some of the best Jedi ever produced by the Order, who defeated Savage Oppress in seconds and even managed to pressure TCW Sidious. I’m the first to troll Maul for the times Disney mistreated him (falling off the edge when facing a blind Kanan or the way he lost to Ahsoka in TCW), but you can’t give the benefit of the doubt to Baylan (whom I adore as a character and like infinitely more than Maul) who has so far no hype and has matched an Ahsoka who hasn’t been thaaat impressive so far. I mean, her performance against the inquisitors in Rebels>>her performance against Marrok, we have no idea how strong she is now since there is no way to scale TWBW Anakin to the real Anakin. Maul should get the benefit of the doubt every time for now
Maul was > Ahsoka in TCW. They seemed more on par in Rebels. But so far Live action Ahsoka hasnt done anything impressive. Perhaps she lost some of her mojo while exiled.