Marvel acknowledge JLA/ Avengers as Cannon as well?

Originally posted by Laminator_X
Actually, both companies acknowledge JLA/Avengers as in-continuity. A recent "Marvel Universe" Avengers guide mentions it in the timeline.

Also, the word for somything that is not canon is apocrypha. The opposite of canonical is apocryphal.

As in Miracleman Apocrypha yes I know this 😖mart:

If what my friend Laminator X says is true and who am I to doubt him then this changes everything!!!!!!!!

In my World the dials go up to 11!!!!!!!!

Keep the faith 🙂

Stay Whirly 🤘

Small gods for small fanboys 🙂

😐

DC FANBOY OR JUST TAKING THE PISS

stop being and ass whirly and stay whirly 🤘

Originally posted by HigH ScholaR
😐

DC FANBOY OR JUST TAKING THE PISS

stop being and ass whirly and stay whirly 🤘

Nope serious and the X is a clue to you 🙂

Can we get a scan of this?

they do refer to it in the giudes vaguley because it happened and is recent but that doesn't mean it's conyiyuity, it was mentioned at the back as "significant comics"

marvel has not said it's contiunty or pushed the jla/avengers any firther accept mention it in a glossary.

Originally posted by HigH ScholaR
they do refer to it in the giudes vaguley because it happened and is recent but that doesn't mean it's conyiyuity, it was mentioned at the back as "significant comics"

marvel has not said it's contiunty or pushed the jla/avengers any firther accept mention it in a glossary.

Its significant to Marvel and in a Marvel guire 😖hifty: The plot thickens 🙂

This is coming from a Marvel fanboy hmmmm...............

No shit Sherlock 🙂

🤨

marvel fanboy. i am not a marvel fanboy

don't think you looked at my post or understood it

Originally posted by HigH ScholaR
they do refer to it in the giudes vaguley because it happened and is recent but that doesn't mean it's conyiyuity, it was mentioned at the back as "significant comics"

marvel has not said it's contiunty or pushed the jla/avengers any firther accept mention it in a glossary.

Access or amalgam or anything like that?

Originally posted by HigH ScholaR
🤨

marvel fanboy. i am not a marvel fanboy

don't think you looked at my post or understood it

I understood it 🙂

Marvel think its "significant" 🙂

Its cannon

"Methinks thou dost protest to much", as Michael Jackson said allegedly dressed in his Thor costume 🙂

methinks thou hast a dc'eth poster in thy bathroom front of thy toilet with thy superman has'th a trunls on eth only

whirly seriously your taking the piss of the whole jls/avengers stuff i use to think you were a level headed guy but you are purposely trying to piss people off and take the piss

I guess he refers to this?

Originally posted by Ultimate Ion
I guess he refers to this?

Proof 🙂

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
Proof 🙂

Originally posted by HigH ScholaR
whirly seriously your taking the piss of the whole jls/avengers stuff i use to think you were a level headed guy but you are purposely trying to piss people off and take the piss

Never 😖hifty: I am spreading enlightenment - call me shakyamuni 😂

Originally posted by Creshosk
Was the Marvel vs DC fight mentioned?

Access or amalgam or anything like that?

no i don't think so, it's mentioned the avengers glossary "teamed with jla against krona; jla/avengers 1 - 4, but it has to put it there aswell as i all the avengers comics that was good, that's why it is there.

sdoesn't prove it's canon FOR MARVEL because it's in glossary that mentions the avengers comic numbers that were good or sold good

Originally posted by HigH ScholaR
no i don't think so, it's mentioned the avengers glossary "teamed with jla against krona; jla/avengers 1 - 4, but it has to put it there aswell as i all the avengers comics that was good, that's why it is there.

sdoesn't prove it's canon FOR MARVEL because it's in glossary that mentions the avengers comic numbers that were good or sold good

hmmm

also where is it stated in comics after the whole jla/avengers thing i'm not saying it didn't happen it did which is why it's mentioned in the guide but that doesn't mean marvel says it canon until it's canon.

and since when did you start listening to guides..........o yeah when you beleiev it's in your favour

LEVEL HEADED MY ASS

Originally posted by HigH ScholaR
also where is it stated in comics after the whole jla/avengers thing i'm not saying it didn't happen it did which is why it's mentioned in the guide but that doesn't mean marvel says it canon until it's canon.

and since when did you start listening to guides..........o yeah when you beleiev it's in your favour

I believe guides make things cannon 🙂

THERE'S NO POINT IS THERE NO ****ING POINT UNTIL MARVEL CLAIM IT'S CANON THEN IT'S CANON AS A GUIDE IS A GUIDE TO ALL THINGS THAT HAPPENED. AND IT DID HAPPEN BUT WHETHER MARVEL WANT TO CLAIM THE CROSSOVER IS TRUE FOR THEM IT AIN'T. HAVEN'T SEEN IT MENTIONED IN COMICS OR PUSHED ANY FURTHER JUST, IN A 2 SENTENCE SIZE`11 FONT IN A GUIDE THAT IS ON THE AVENGERS WHICH THE CROSSOVER WAS JLA/AVENGERS.