 |
darthdumbledore
Movie Buff 123
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom |
Hitchcock VS. Kubrick
Which One Of These Is best My Moneys On Hitchcock
|
Apr 16th, 2005 09:26 PM |
|
|
| |
|
BackFire
Blood. It's nature's lube
 Gender: Male
Location: Huntington Beach, CA Moderator |
I'd say Kubrick, where as hitchock films always were similar in theme and genre, Kubricks work spanned every genre and were all immensely different from one another.
__________________
|
|
Apr 16th, 2005 09:31 PM |
|
|
| |
|
darthdumbledore
Movie Buff 123
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom |
Fair Enough A Clockwork Orange Was A masterpiece
|
|
Apr 16th, 2005 09:49 PM |
|
|
| |
|
darthdumbledore
Movie Buff 123
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom |
But Does He Have Any Hugely Influential Films Like Hitchcocks Psycho
|
|
Apr 16th, 2005 09:50 PM |
|
|
| |
|
Dr. Strangelove
The King Stay The King
 Gender: Male
Location: Interzone University |
I would say 2001: A Space Odyssey was a very influential film to the sci fi genre.
__________________
“As flies to wanton boys are we to the gods, they kill us for their sport.”
|
|
Apr 16th, 2005 10:00 PM |
|
|
| |
|
BackFire
Blood. It's nature's lube
Gender: Male
Location: Huntington Beach, CA Moderator |
Yep, along with Clockwork Orange and Dr Strangelove.
Actually, all of his films were influential in one way or another.
__________________
Last edited by BackFire on Apr 16th, 2005 at 10:15 PM
|
|
Apr 16th, 2005 10:08 PM |
|
|
| |
|
MildPossession
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: Account Restricted |
I like both just about the same, but Hitchcock comes out tops for me.
|
|
Apr 16th, 2005 10:16 PM |
|
|
| |
|
King Burger
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: Account Restricted |
Kubrick.
Like BackFire said, he made all types of movies,
from film noir, to war-drama, to historical epics,
to comedies (black comedies atleast), to horror,
to science fiction, to drama (Lolita...sort of).
The only things he didn't do was straight out
romance or action/adevntures films.
Besides, while Hitchcock's films are enjoyable
to atch, Kubrick's make you think, and often
stay with you for a while after the film ended.
|
|
Apr 17th, 2005 12:16 AM |
|
|
| |
|
tabby999
Music Idiot apparently
 Gender: Male
Location: Melbourne, Australia |
yeah, kubrick wins in my books, i didn't really like Hitchcock all that much, not to mention 2001: A Space Odyssey us possibly the best looking movie of all time
__________________
If you dont like Frenzal Rhomb, your a whore!
I am aware that "your" should be "you're," and while I know I should change it as not to offend the grammar fans around the boards, school always said not to bow to peer pressure so it stays as it is
|
|
Apr 17th, 2005 12:59 AM |
|
|
| |
|
el barto_1
kicking ass for the lord
 Gender: Male
Location: Norway |
kubrick all the way, full metal jacket was a masterpiece
__________________
|
|
Apr 17th, 2005 07:01 AM |
|
|
| |
|
MildPossession
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: Account Restricted |
Hitchcock films stay with me after the film has ended. As well as Kubricks.
|
|
Apr 17th, 2005 02:31 PM |
|
|
| |
|
Cory Chaos
AmStar 14 Manager
Gender: Male
Location: Mooresville, NC |
While my vote goes to Kubrick, "Full Metal Jacket" isn't a masterpiece IMO, just because it's almost two totally different movies. That's flawed, but I still love it. "2001" I found to be WAY too dark, by that, I mean lighting, settings, etc. It's a very sleep movie.
Best example would be "The Shining". The tracking shot of Jack Nicholson trapsing through the snow ridge, clutching his arm with that scowl. That's master cinematography. Kubrick gets under your skin, Hitchcock I always found to be a little pretentious, from what little I've seen.
|
|
Apr 17th, 2005 02:46 PM |
|
|
| |
|
darthdumbledore
Movie Buff 123
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom |
good but wouldnt you say Hitchcock paved the way figuratively speaking for that genre of directing
|
|
Apr 17th, 2005 02:49 PM |
|
|
| |
|
jinXed by JaNx
Senior Member
 Gender: Male
Location: Pittsburgh |
To compare these two is ridiculous. There is so much content to be taken into consideration for these two, when comparing there skills with the lens. Both of these cats had a technique that was never introduced into film before. I think kubrick had more cultivated skill, but i will say that i think hitchcock had a sharper vision of what he wanted and how to present it. Both contributed just as much. When ever you are watching a kubrick or hitchcock film, you know it is a kubrick or hitchcock film , and that is a good thing. These cats used pure camera style, not these horseshit editing techniques that are used by modern directors to gain a style.
__________________
"If you tell the truth, you never have to remember anything" -Twain
(sig by Scythe)
|
|
Apr 17th, 2005 05:41 PM |
|
|
| |
|
MildPossession
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: Account Restricted |
They are both excellent auteurs yes. That is why I love both.
|
|
Apr 17th, 2005 10:19 PM |
|
|
| |
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
Text-only version |
|
|
KMC Community Forums
