I never knew their were any plans to make another one and i agree with Eclipso,Daredevil was better than most comicbook movies out there that have been made.
parker.. i agree.. daredevil is one of those best comic book based movies..along side with punisher. Spiderman might have stayed true to the comics in some kind of a way.. but the casting, and sam raimi ruined the character.!
Daredevil Directors Cut was one of the best comic book movies made. The theatrical version....that was a disgrace, and after seeing how fox butchered the movie, i hope DareDevil 2 is made when Fox looses the rights
thats the most hilarious thing I have ever heard making it look real since we are talking about a comicbook movie here. yeah like a guy gaining powers to stick to walls and have superhuman strength ALL somehow from the bite of a genetically altered spider is REAL? well organics coming out of the wrists sure as hell are not real,the placement would be the webbing shooting out of his butt if you want to talk real. again a guy swinging from buildings from a spiderbite more than anything is fake.
exactly.well said my man.I disagree though that it wasnt better than the xmen movies.havent seen the last one but the first two focused way too much on wolverines character and not enough on the others.
Ben Affleck turned a sequel a while back. Besides how can anyone say that Daredevil was a good film. I thought it was a piece of you know what. Second the costume he wore, that horrible degrating plot, bad box office returns that is why there is no sequel.
I heard a while back that the studio wanted to do this. It wasn't going anywhere though 'cause they wanted Affleck back. And Affleck said he wouldn't do it unless Kevin Smith wrote or directed it or something.
So getting the strength and ability to stick to walls from a radioactive spider is more realistic than a genetically engineered spider?
I don't get why you're bringing down the movies because they're not realistic. Spider-Man is no way realistic.
When did I ever say that getting the strength and ability to stick to walls from a radioactive spider is more realistic than a genetically altered spider? the fact is they are BOTH just as unrealistic as the other.Obviously you only read parts of that post and not the WHOLE post.I was pointing out how lame and laughable his argument is that organics should have been in the movie when he made that ludicrous comment "make it real" because THE WHOLE THING OF SPIDER-MAN IS UNREAL.That was my point I was making is if you want "realism in a movie"- which apparently he does,,you shouldn't be seeing a comic book movie in the first place. My other point I made that you also obviously did not read was you want talk about making it real-which AGAIN is what HE said,not me,then organics should not be in the movie because realistically and logically,they would shoot out of his ass.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Feb 14th, 2007 at 12:34 AM
KMC Community Forums
Feb 10th, 2007 02:57 AM
yeah like a guy gaining powers to stick to walls and have superhuman strength ALL somehow from the bite of a genetically altered spider is REAL? 
again a guy swinging from buildings from a spiderbite more than anything is fake. 
