In my opinion a guy who can hold a nuclear blast with a force-field, lift houses, lift islands, can see what the whole world thinks can take Gladiator out of the game for a while.
Someone who can break Surfer's board can do some damage to Gladiator too. Recently he has been shown pretty powerful. Other than that even Cannonball could stand up to him. "Godlike" Cable is stronger than Cannonball, streonger than Vulcan he can do Gladiator. Throwing an island on him for distraction and then project an explosive forcefield. And then just do Glads.
I hope you know none of that stands up to Gladiator's best. Gladiator contained a blast that was going to level the solar system and destroyed a planet in 3 hits.
Gladiator did that how many times??? For Cable it is everyday's job he can do it every single day. Gladiator is the character everybody beats once. Even Gambit owned him with a pack of cards.
Doesn't matter how many times he did it since we use characters at their best. His best feats outshine Cable's best feats. Not saying he'll win but it is the truth. Vs "Godlike" (horrible term btw) Cable it's a good fight. Current Cable is going down pretty fast though.
I just think it's hilarious how people on this forum act like he has no good feats.
__________________
Last edited by HaSon on Nov 18th, 2006 at 07:30 PM
your not talking about the Gladiator/supreme comic are you?
anyway one topic
5 out of 5
It all depends on how good glads is feeling about himself (not that it would be a walk in the park if he felt low) I would say that glads at full confadence is compairable to pre-crisis superman and at low confadence he is about dos superman so either way it's a very very hard fight.
I'm not saying he hasn't got good feats. I just think he isn't too tough. Of course he had high feats, I even like Glads but the thing he got owned owned by Gambit isn't really a good feat and it bothers me.