1. Kun wins. He is a lightsaber prodigy. He owned the two carth Jedi, true they are not exceptional but he still beat them both in no time, and he owned Vodo in his prime and stalemated Ulic. Revan's saber skills are pretty much unknown.
2. Kun, because Revan has no way of blocking the amulet, and even without the amulet, what has Revan done that compares with freezing the entire senate?
Revan was also described as a saber prodigy and the best in an order of tens of thousands. Simply being a 'lightsaber prodigy' doesn't guarantee victory for anybody.
There's no proof that Kun can control the amulet, much less even use it in a fight, especially against someone as powerful as Revan. What did Revan do that's on par with the stasis? I'd say ripping out the language of the Rakata and giving them basic. That's more impressive.
Dude, Kun used the amulet to destroy an ancient Sith Beast, the spirit of Freedon Nadd and he used it to knock out Aleema Keto. What makes you say there's no proof that he can control it? Why the f*ck does it matter how powerful Revan is, the amulet is still the same, and can be fired, just the same.
He fired the amulet ONCE, when he was about to die. There's no proof that he could do it again, especially in the presence of another powerful force user.
The fight would be very close. Kun can win however in this case, if he has got his double-bladed Light Saber.
In case of 2:
Revan seems to possess higher Force Mastery and he has great knowledge of Sith Lore. Kun's Force Mastery is also exceptional and he also has got amulets. This would be a very close fight and can go either way.
In case of 3:
Revan has got higher chances to win in an all out encounter because apart from being a powerful warrior, he is very smart and a great tactician. Though the fight would be very close.
Kun had about 6 months as Dark Lord to invent an entirely new weapon (the doublebladed lightsaber) and come up with an also entirely new style of fighting with this weapon. I highly doubt he is more skilled with a 2 blades than with 1 blade.
Dude, in the post above yours I named three times when he used it. So there's three times he used it that we know of and it's quite possible that he used it at other times that we didn't see.
No DS, he didn't use it to knock out Aleema. He used sith magic on her, to a greater degree. And he killed Nadd by sticking the amulet through his spirit. Not exactly "Using the amulet", now is it?
Oh my god, are you being difficult on purpose? You make me search through the comic just to prove you wrong. I hope you are happy:
(please log in to view the image)
That is the amulet.
How isn't it using the amulet? He fired it up, shot it, and it destroyed Nadd's spirit. It doesn't matter how it killed the spirit, it still did. If it wasn't the amulet being fired that killed Nadd, what was it? It was definitely the amulet.
No, it's NOT the amulet. He says "Fool, Nadd has taught you the beginning of sith magic, but I have learned everything", and proceeds to shoot the same type of energy beam back at Aleema.
No, he didn't fire it up, he just stuck it into the spirit. How the hell is that "using" the amulet? He's going to stick it through Revan and make him disappear?
(please log in to view the image)
That is a second time that he uses the amulet.
That is the hand that the amulet is attached to, and you can see that the energy beam starts from his wrist, just like it does other times that he uses the amulet. Why did you post the quote, I have read it, and it doesn't say that it isn't the amulet. All it says is that it is "Sith magic" and the amulet is Sith magic.
You're right, I see now that he stuck it through him. I had remembered him blasting the spirit with the amulet. My bad. But he does use it against Aleema, and would use it against revan, especially if he were losing.
What the **** are you smoking? The properties of the amulet blast are completely different than that of his sith magic, which was the exact same property as Aleema's blast. You lose.
Oct 1st, 2007 11:21 AM
