Gender: Unspecified Location: One for the other hand
Were Dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark?
I found this to be a funny read, they seem to take many liberties in their math and the only way the can even make it work is to take out the vast majority of "kinds" of animals. Some other sites say that Noah didn't have to go and get all the animals that God made them come to him so my question would be is how did the land animals from the other continents get to him? The other question would be is after the flood where did all the incests come from since they were not taken on the Ark and they would have all died from the flood. How did some of these animals even make it to the Middle East when they have such a sort life span and only one male and female are making the trip? Some sites say that Noah would have only taken the young animals, most of them would have been full adults by the time (if they could) reach the Middle East.
They believe God (the omniscient and omnipotent creator of all) was born human through a Palestinian virgin and lived some 30 odd years, only occasional dipping into the power cosmic to heal someone or turn water into wine. So, yes, they do believe that.
I'm of the idea that it was a localized flood. MASSIVE, but localized. And only the animals, for the most part, from that area, were put on the ark.
Just the 3 millions+ species of mammals alone would not fit on the ark, much less all the others.
You can't believe in creationsim, a 6000 year old Earth, and Noah saving all land dwelling species. Either evolution is the mechanism and Noah just saved origin species and God rapidly, over just a few generations, evolved all the species we see, or it is like I say. Earth is 4.5 billion years old, evolution is the way it be, and Noah only saved local animals in a massive local flood.
thanks for proving that amongst the billions of people on the planet, the ones' with access to information and understanding are the idiots.
simple case point - there is a bug/insect/beetle called the "bom -kewer" or exploding beetle, how is it possible that a creature can evolve an explosition out of their ass without killing themselves?
does the theory of the floating continets ring a bell to anyone. if you can give me one valid explanation of evolution i will buy into it just 1.
there is a microspecies evolution, a theory that even creationist support. that creature can evolve into something better but not from a ape to a human, unless you have the missing link of americans in there.
Gender: Male Location: Southern Oregon,
Looking at you.
Humans are apes. We did not evolve for animals that live today. Both Chimpanzees and Humans evolved from a common ancestor. Micro Evolution is Evolution.
for the love of GOD! there is no MISSING LINK. because humans didnt evolve FROM apes of today. they both evolved along different paths from ANOTHER pre historic ape which DOESNT exist anymore. HOW hard is this to understand. they are both branches of an OLDER species than either one of them. you will NEVER find middle species the way you want to find them.
thank you for confirming that you are an ape, now to the other non primate intelligent life out there...
if evolution of ape to human be true, why do we still have apes, if evolution is the "ultimate" form, then why would apes remain apes? there are some serious wholes in that theory.
kinda like swizz cheessse.
btw, do you like banana's.
and no, if a wild pheasant is kept in captivity the next generation will have a different colour shade - micro evolution
if a wild pheasant is kept in captivity and the next generation turns into dumb asses chickens - cross breeding.
evolution the pheasant looses all the pretty feathers and its beak shortens to that of a chicken that is evolution.
KMC Community Forums
May 23rd, 2009 12:50 AM
You showed him/her. 
