Steel... To me... Isnt really worthy of being on iron mans level... Much less nova primes
__________________ Quotes from Hia8:
"I claimed that the science is sometimes faulty."
"You don't understand. This is fiction. That means none of this stuff really happened."
"There is no writer to purposely ignore a character's natural ability just because it suits the story."
"in some cases because the writer knows that Character A will dominate Character B easily and refuses to allow this to happen for the sake of the story."
I'm not asking because I think Iron-man wins, I'm just genuinely
asking because I do not know the character well enough. From the little I've seen, I don't see a reason why Iron-man couldn't counter him. He's known for being a top dog who can hang with those often considered more powerful, so someone please enlighten me on Nova
He's fast, strong, maneuverable, has very powerful energy blasts, gravity control, and some other stuff.
Toughness-wise, his reaction to Moonstone, Venom, Radioactive Man, and Penance all wailing on him with their best shots was to... read them their rights, because he was out of their league.
Iron Man can hang with those more powerful, but Nova's skilled with his much greater power.
Mostly this is just flat out a bad match up for Tony. He's physically outclassed in every category and tech wise "bleeding edge" would be akin to a battery made from a lemon and a few pieces of copper compared to Xandarian tech.
So in a nutshell, Nova is what Tony would be in a few millennia.
Last edited by dmills on Jul 24th, 2011 at 06:17 PM
Jk. Looking at my statement it sounds worse then I meant it to. But if you do a technical capability comparison that's pretty much what it boils down to. Nova's tech is vastly superior.
Last edited by dmills on Jul 24th, 2011 at 07:00 PM
So am i Starks armor has alot of the generic abilities Nova has to a dumbed down level of course and as far as straight POWER Stark is blown out of the water