The NS5s are much less durable than the Terminators. They weren't built for combat per say. Spooner and the Civilians were putting quite a dent in the army of NS5s accosting them. Even one bullet to the dome took out and unwary NS5 when he was standing in line at the factory. Whereas the Governators have feats like being run over, blown up, shot multiple times, and even shanked with a large iron spike and still coming back for more. Another thing is that you havent stated weapons. Are the terminators sent back through time with just arnolds biceps as weapons? Or are we talking Phased Plasma Rifles with a 40 watt range here. Either way the NS5s are Terminated.
The scene after when Will gets his car crashed and it's flipped over.
One of the robots is still alive and is missing one arm. It uses that one arm to flip the car over on it's side and then slides it towards will smith easily.
I agree if they have guns the Terminators would likely win based on durability alone, but in H2H combat the NS-5 were crazy agile and quick and stronger.
I think they would be able to give a T-800 a run for it's money much the same way Spider-Man does against more durable characters.
Agreed with Newjak. With guns, the Terminators have far better durability feats, almost unstoppable with guns alone.
But H2H, the i-robots were definitely faster and more agile, and yes, stronger. The T-800's don't really have that many strength feats. I give h2h to the i-robots.
Since those NSs were going down to bullets, the T-800s can potentially one-shot them. Only their speed can help them here as their strength is counterbalanced by the Terminators' far greater durability.
That single T-800 unit; ripped a T-600 unit apart; endured multiple Bazooka shots at point-blank range; and even endured molten lava. If this isn't DURABILITY then I do not know what is.
KMC Community Forums
Oct 29th, 2012 01:29 PM
