|
 |
100 TIE Bombers vs. 100 Naboo Starfighters
You do not have permission to vote on this poll. |
| TIE |
   |
8 |
57.14% |
| Naboo Starfighters |
   |
6 |
42.86% |
| Total: |
14 votes |
100% |
|
| |
|
Tormentor_2004
Restricted
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: San Jose, CaliforniaAccount Restricted
|
100 TIE Bombers vs. 100 Naboo Starfighters
WHich starships win?
|
Mar 30th, 2005 04:21 AM |
|
|
| |
|
Darth_Nefarus
Redi Knight
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: United States
|
Naboo starfighters are a little more durable, so I'll give it to them.
__________________
"The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant, next to the power of the force."
|
|
Mar 30th, 2005 04:22 AM |
|
|
| |
|
Janus Marius
Plo Koon Rulez!
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Hiding from zombies
|
This is like asking who wins in a fight, a spitfire or a stuka. Fighter planes excel at defeating other planes. Bombers attack bigger targets.
|
|
Mar 30th, 2005 05:05 AM |
|
|
| |
|
Darth_DaNThEMaN
Restricted
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: United StatesAccount Restricted
|
i guess i cant speak for anyone else, but i personally was never in the air force, so i have no idea what ur talking about, lol. but i agree.
__________________
|
|
Mar 30th, 2005 11:37 AM |
|
|
| |
|
wuk es't
Restricted
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: BelgiumAccount Restricted
|
Naboo fighters cuz bombers can only attack groundforces. The Naboo fighters just shoot the Bombers out of the air
__________________
I used 2b jango fatt
|
|
Mar 30th, 2005 03:23 PM |
|
|
| |
|
Bobafett34
Restricted
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: RussiaAccount Restricted
|
****ING *******
|
|
Feb 9th, 2013 08:51 AM |
|
|
| |
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 03:18 PM. |
|
|
| |
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
Text-only version |
|
|
