Hancock and Thor slap around Doomsday until it has absorbed enough energy to become powerful enough to kill them both.
DD was a shitty villain in a shitty film, but its power-levels are insanely high, you need K-Nite or some combatants that bring more than brick-level attacks.
__________________ "Happiness is a lie. Life is horror. The light is always dying all across the universe. The last star will flicker out someday, when it does, all that remains is shadow. And I will be its king!"'-Amahl Farouk
Thor withstood the full force and heat of a star>> Clark died to a nuke
Thor is vastly more durable
__________________ "Happiness is a lie. Life is horror. The light is always dying all across the universe. The last star will flicker out someday, when it does, all that remains is shadow. And I will be its king!"'-Amahl Farouk
Thor and Hancock together will physically outmatch DD... problem is I don't think they have the damage output to permanently take out DD. If a win can be garnered by a simple 10 count knockout then yeah, they can win. But if we're talking about actually killing DD or fully knocking him out then I can't see how they do it unless Thor has Stormbreaker and he chops DD's head off.
The nuke didn't kill Superman, it put him in some sort of weird dehydrated coma (followed the comic somewhat here) and he needed a solar recharge, while Thor seemed like he was about to die after the neutron star feat.
"I think he's dying. He needs the axe!" -Eitri the Dwarf
I think it's fair to assume they both would have eventually died from those feats had it not been for an external power source (the sun and stormbreaker).
Especially seeing as the full force of a star is actually so far above a nuke you might as well be comparing a cup of water to the ocean.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Are we forgetting that Superman's powers come from a star; absorbing its radiation? Kinda silly to ignore that. He could potentially have been powered up exponentially should he have done the same feat as Thor.
But it also needs to be pointed out that neutron star is a collapsed massive star, so its radiation may or may not power Superman.
The point was comparing their durability, if Superman gets powered up by something, surviving it isn't a durability feat.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
DNCU has always shown Superman to be amped by a yellow star. That star would amp him beyond belief. Not only could he survive it be he would be empowered by it.
Emphasis on yellow star. Not just any star. I'm pretty sure that neutron stars are not yellow stars. In fact if I'm not mistaken, I do think a neutron star is originally a red star.
__________________
Last edited by FrothByte on Dec 28th, 2018 at 11:26 PM
The way Jor-El explained it for the DCCU, it seems Krypton's sun was a red dwarf or a similar "cool" star. While the emphasis was that Earth's sun was "young" and more vibrant (ie yellow star = higher/est energy output) and therefore was able to power Superman's kryptonian physiology.
Edit: Found the quote: "Earth's sun is younger and brighter than Krypton's was. Your cells have drunk in its radiation, strengthening your muscles, your skin, your senses. Earth's gravity is weaker, yet its atmosphere is more nourishing. You've grown stronger here than I ever could have imagined. The only way to know how strong, is to keep testing your limits." -Jor-El
KMC Community Forums
Dec 28th, 2018 05:22 AM
