Okay so this JL supes versus Luke Cage. But how weakened would supes have to be for a fair fight? 50%? 70%? Luke Cage is bullet proof and rocket launcher proof too but an Iron fist punch to the face certainly rattled his cage So supes at full power would destroy Luke. Also it’s pure H2H and no BFR and no speed blitz bull shit. Fight takes place in the place JL faced Steppen.
Probably weakened to a similar degree to how he was after being hit by one of Batman's kryptonite gas canisters.
Problem is, unless he is kept permanently gassed, it will wear off in a few minutes, and then he will punch Luke so hard that he vomits out his intestines.
__________________ Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
If you took his biggest strength feat which would be pulling an ocean liner which weigh between 250,000-400,000 tons out of water. So .1% of 400k is 40,000k.
Unless cage has a feat above lifting or moving more then 40,000k he loses to .1% Superman
I believe you mean 1%; .1% would be a tenth of a percent, or 400
BTW, 1% would be 4,000
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Which has a displacement of 5k tons. Full complement/
And your math is wrong. .1% of 400k is 400 not 400k.
The friction coefficient of ice is about .05 or 5% not .1%.
So closer number would be 5% of 5k w/c is 250 tons. Not saying it’s that number but it would be around that area. I would say closer to 1k tons than it is 250 just to err on the side of not lowballing.
Last edited by Nibedicus on Jan 7th, 2019 at 08:21 PM
Also the displacement weight is only measured if it’s in the water. The ship was on its side out of water so it’s not the displacement weight. It’s the full amount.
The weight of an object or substance can be measured by floating a sufficiently buoyant receptacle in the cylinder and noting the water level. After placing the object or substance in the receptacle, the difference in weight of the water level volumes will equal the weight of the object.
In before h1 dismisses that feat since it doesn't show physics correctly.
Oh wait, it's a DC character. nevermind.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
To be honest that Neutron star feat by Thor wasn't displaying those much physics at all, there was literally no gravity or typical circumstances that would be involved with a star in space.
Almost all higher end feats have problems if one were to use the, that's not how things work in RL argument. guess which company gets a pass from h1.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
That building that Superman is carrying is most likely not solid concrete. Because if it was, it would crumble under its own weight since the point that Superman is applying Force to lift it, is ridiculously small compared to the distribution of the rest of the weight of the building.
So we must assume that the building was way lighter than what it appears to be in order for it not to crumble under its own weight.
__________________
Last edited by Inhuman on Jan 7th, 2019 at 11:25 PM