Either way, Darkseid wins. Thor shouldn't be able to block/absorb/reflect the Omega Effect. No character should, unless they're essential to the universe (ie. Galactus).
Gender: Male Location: Planning to take over the WORLD!
hmm, this is a tough one. it's a battle i'd LOVE to see. the only problem i have with what lord s said above is that while the omega effect is obviously famously powerful and generally considered to be 'unstoppable', i've never understood WHY it is so powerful. there is no apparent tie to the source (unless recently shown . . .??) and as such it is simply a power he gained from the infinity pit on apokalips. WHY should it be considered so great? why should i believe that it surpasses the power of the celestials, a power thor HAS absorbed and contained? he's absorbed and contained a blast from phoenix. the list is endless.
we could say darkseid>odin thus darkseid>mjollnir. that's hard to counter, but given darkseid's portrayals in recent years, i'd have to question the accuracy of those comparisons.
i'm still gonna side with darkseid (because i think he's a GREAT character -- though i LOVE thor as well) in this, but it would NOT be easy, and i can certainly see thor getting some wins.
I'd say the OE destroy's thor's hammer like Destroyer did with his disintegration beams... Or maybe the hammer gets cut in half... like when Perrikus cut it with his scythe (did I spell that right?)
The OE used to be able to ignore objects to disintegrate whatever object it needed to... I'd say the OE unwrites Thor.
Darkseid has withstood the full blasts of Superman before and winced... I'd equate that to Thors godblast... and say.. Darkseid would feel it... but he'd go on... whereas Thor's a goner.
__________________ Quotes from Hia8:
"I claimed that the science is sometimes faulty."
"You don't understand. This is fiction. That means none of this stuff really happened."
"There is no writer to purposely ignore a character's natural ability just because it suits the story."
"in some cases because the writer knows that Character A will dominate Character B easily and refuses to allow this to happen for the sake of the story."
I agree with alot of your post. But this sticks out to me. I thought all of Darkseids "low showings" were retconned to be his Avatars? If it's true I have no problems with this. Darkseid is supposed to be one of the top dogs.
__________________
"I am not afraid of the dark the dark's afraid of me"
what is it you have problems with? doesn't this mean he's still a top dog?
__________________ Quotes from Hia8:
"I claimed that the science is sometimes faulty."
"You don't understand. This is fiction. That means none of this stuff really happened."
"There is no writer to purposely ignore a character's natural ability just because it suits the story."
"in some cases because the writer knows that Character A will dominate Character B easily and refuses to allow this to happen for the sake of the story."
Yeah, used to ignore. I'd say if WW can deflect it with her bracelets, Thor can definitely absorb it. Not that Mjolnir is as durable as her Aegis shield though. Don't get it confused.
Godblast KO's DS. If it sent Galactus fleeing for his life, DS is definitely getting hurt.
I'm not about to compare anything to Juggernaut in order to somehow feed your rabid Thor appetite. The Aegis shield is as invulnerable as invulnerable gets in comic books.
Neither did DC, so they came up with the worst retcon since Aunt May came back to life. I would say that Mjolnir would block the OE beams just like Wonder Woman blocked it with her bracelets in 'Girl From Krypton'... but apparently, those aren't the "real Omega Beams" and that wasn't the "real Darkseid."
BTW, this also isn't the "real OnedumbG0" posting and this isn't the "real KMC" but a figment of your imagination... which isn't the "real imagination" btw.
KMC Community Forums
Nov 1st, 2006 10:13 PM
