 |
bakerboy
Senior Member
Gender: Male
Location: Spain |
the battle of the Kongs.
A three way battle between all the cinematic Kongs. I mean:
The first King Kong from the 1933 version
vs
the second King Kong from the 1976 remake
Vs
the third King Kong from the 2005 remake.
My guess is with the third Kong. Maybe he is the shortest, but he did the most impressing feat: he did beat three V-Rex.
__________________
The beatles, best group ever.
John Lennon, Musical genius of all time
Helen Mirren and Julie Christie , most lovely british actresses of all time.
|
Aug 21st, 2008 06:39 PM |
|
|
| |
|
Robtard
Senor Member
 Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA |
Re: the battle of the Kongs.
1933 and 1976 are basically the same size and strength, 1976 looked better due to technology. So either could equally win.
2005 Kong would get picked up like a toddler and crushed, despite his superior and unorthodox gorilla-combat moves.
Edit: Went back and looked, 1933 doesn't look that much bigger (it's been 20+ years since I watched it) and 1976 isn't all that much either. So I say the 2005 ape wins.
__________________
You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb
Last edited by Robtard on Aug 21st, 2008 at 09:13 PM
|
|
Aug 21st, 2008 09:07 PM |
|
|
| |
|
MightyCelestial
Member
Gender: Male
Location: Alnilam, 2nd star in the Orion Belt |
B'cuz of the size differences, I think that the battle would be more much more fair & equally matched if instead, a ginormous piece of cardboard was laid down & the apes engaged in a Bronx style, electric boogaloo, lock-poppin' breakdance-off.
|
|
Sep 10th, 2008 01:27 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NemeBro
Senior Member
 Gender: Unspecified
Location: Saving KMC |
2005 Kong was a kung fu masta.
__________________
Thanks Scythe!
|
|
Sep 10th, 2008 02:27 AM |
|
|
| |
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
Text-only version |
|
|
KMC Community Forums
