I love Batman. Keaton's Batman was good, but the story should 've been better. Bale's Batman however just purely rocks. Better acting, better costume and most importantly better story.
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
Bale would beat the shit out of Keaton
Bale is a better actor than Keaton
Batman Begins was the more faithful movie
The Batman from Batman Begins would beat the shit out of the Batman from Batman 89.
I think any way you look at that Batman Begins was superior. Batman 89 is still fun, though. I enjoy it. Should maybe have been called "The Joker" though.
yeah thats a no brainer.I mean seriously,if were talking about who would win in a fight between keatons batman and Bales,thats a joke.Keatons Batman was a wuss in Batman 89.He couldnt even beat ONE guy getting the crap beat out of him by that Jokers goon at the end.That was pathetic.The batman in the comics could easily have wiped the floor with that guy blindfolded even being just the LITTLE hurt that he was when he was fighting him.Batman 89 is a disgrace to the comics.Bales Batman did Batman justice showing off his true martial arts skills taking out a dozen or so goons within seconds.Now THATS Batman.
I agree with EVERYTHING Bardock said except about it being fun.Boring snoozefest of a movie for me.I especially agree that the movie should have been called The Joker since The Joker had the majority of the screentime and Batman was just a supporting character.Just one of many things I hate about that crapfest movie.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Mar 28th, 2008 at 10:44 PM
you can say that again. well the one comment about Kim Basinger not being an annoying lead is a good point.the rest is incredibly hysterical though. well looks like we now know who the Burton/Keaton apologist is.