Not in every situation or scenario. The UN is more powerful overall but the IG can beat the UN in a fight depending on the weilders and other factors. And in either case UN>>>Abraxas so that's moot.
__________________
“Where the longleaf pines are whispering
to him who loved them so.
Where the faint murmurs now dwindling
echo o’er tide and shore."
-A Grave Epitaph in Santa Rosa County, Florida; I wish I could remember the man's name.
Gender: Male Location: Drinking gasoline. Pissing napalm.
Nothing is "official" on this site. Just because someone believes it and may have argued eloquently for that point of view, doesn't make it true. The IG still bested the UN in the only even remotely direct confrontation there was.
The UN was MUCH weaker back then. For ex the UN only destroyed a universe in an old story(BCA) in the hands of Galactus himself. Now in the Abraxas saga, Richards destroyed the multi-verse in a blink of an eye and then restarted it.
The UN is greater in scope. It, nigh-instantly, destroyed and recreated the entire multiverse. The IG simply doesn't have that broad of a feat to it's name.
But none of that changes the fact that the IG is still the more versatile weapon, by a long shot.
Gender: Male Location: Drinking gasoline. Pissing napalm.
Not really.
Because that's the amount of power needed for the plot to be resolved. There was no need to destroy the multiverse, only a universe to bring the story to a successful conclusion.
Because the entire multiverse needed to be restarted in order to seal Abraxas back up. So the UN did that, too. Has nothing to do with it being weaker then or stronger now.
"Because that's the amount of power needed for the plot to be resolved. There was no need to destroy the multiverse, only a universe to bring the story to a successful conclusion."
"Because the entire multiverse needed to be restarted in order to seal Abraxas back up. So the UN did that, too. Has nothing to do with it being weaker then or stronger now."
Gender: Male Location: Drinking gasoline. Pissing napalm.
Galactusischere, if someone needs a universe to be destroyed so the story can be resolved, why would they have it destroy something more than that? The story called for a universe to be destroyed.
The Abraxas story called for the multiverse to be rebooted. It did both of those functions. Doesn't mean it was any weaker prior to that story. It just meant they had no need to use its full power before then.
So if I had the UN and I wanted to destroy the omniverse because I had to, would that mean that I would succeed? That's whay your saying, UN has no limits since it can erase as much the wielder wants.
Im not. He said that it was needed to destroy a universe in order to resolve the plot of the story. Then in another it was needed to destroy the multi-verse for the plot to be resolved. So all im asking is, in a story where the plot revolves around the omniverse or an omniversal level threat and a UN wielder seeks to resolve the plot(nullify the omniverse), would the UN wielder succeed then?
KMC Community Forums
Feb 14th, 2010 06:31 AM
