Gender: Male Location: 4th Street Underpass, Manhattan
I have yet to see Under Seige, but I'm willing to wager that Ryback hasn't done anything to outclass Matrix (and Rambo hasn't either), so I'll say Matrix is the victor
They are both better hand to hand fighter's than matrix imo, rambo has a range advantage and ryback has throwing weps. i would give matrix an advantage over rambo pure hth because he is superhumanly strong but ryback is a much to effective hth fighter he fight's to kill he won't be pulled into a slugfest like rambo might.
Gender: Male Location: 4th Street Underpass, Manhattan
I've avoided Bond but I've been thinking of giving his 90's films a watch. I may start with GoldenEye.
IDK, probably because I am a massive 24/Bourne fan, I enjoy the rougher, grittier portrayal of him by Craig more than the paragon 90's version by Brosnan
Ryback, if there is no teaming up by Matrix and Rambo.
Sure Matrix is big but so was Penn in Under Siege 2 and Ryback was zipping punches into him at will and throwing him around. He had a bit of a problem breaking his leg but dominated him overall. Matrix's H2H feats come from fighting out of shape Bennett and Mall Cops, Ryback nailed hardened mercenaries and former military men.
Rambo with the bat could cause some damage but Ryback could easily wrap that up with the piano wire and stab him to death with the nail file. Rambo is tough but has hardly any 'fights' and the ones that were were just contests of strength and not so much skill. Remember this isn't a 'striking from hiding place' contest. Ryback deflects strength well and has way more skill with grapples/choke holds/deflection etcs.
Yeah I agree Ryback was just too skillful. Rambo comes in second. Matrix had to insane strength feats but the guy just doesn't match up in the skill dept.
KMC Community Forums
Jun 22nd, 2012 12:50 AM
