Jurrassic park 4

I've heard some weird things about this upcoming movie.
for one, the dinosaurs may learn to swim (they were getting smarter in the last movie).
But the best rumor i've heard (in my opinion) was that it might not be dinosaurs anymore. possibly going into the ice age animals, e.g. Mammoths, Sabertooth Tigers, etc..
I think the dinosaurs have lost their appeal in the movies now.

my vote is it should of stoped at #1

It would be so dumb to watch Mammoths and Sabertooth Tigers compared to dinosaurs.

what the hell, dinosaurs might have lost a big part of their appeal to the general public but dinos still have a bigger appeal then ice age animals.

and with youngsters dinos still rule

I'd rather see dinos, but I'd rather not see a part 4.

Originally posted by gls
I've heard some weird things about this upcoming movie.
for one, the dinosaurs may learn to swim (they were getting smarter in the last movie).
But the best rumor i've heard (in my opinion) was that it might not be dinosaurs anymore. possibly going into the ice age animals, e.g. Mammoths, Sabertooth Tigers, etc..
I think the dinosaurs have lost their appeal in the movies now.

I dont know why they wouldnt have dinos not to be in the movie because i mean there is only one like really vicous animal back then which was the sabertooth

Originally posted by Aldaron
I do know that there will be no Ice Age animals, if there were any the Movie wouldn't be called Jurassic Park IV now would it?
By the way John Hammond,Ian Malcolm, and Droctor Allen Grant are reportly to return in JP IV, and parts of the books that were not in the first two movies might bee in the JPIV. Dinos did swim(check the book, first one), so it's not like they are learning anything new.

well, it doesn't necessarily have to be called jurrassic park to be a sequal. Like the upcoming Jumanji sequal "Zathura"
yea, i doubt it'll have things other than dinos, but still aren't you sick of them too?

Originally posted by DeNiro
I dont know why they wouldnt have dinos not to be in the movie because i mean there is only one like really vicous animal back then which was the sabertooth

There were others, like the weird pelican looking animal that had a razor sharp beak that ate meat (forgot what it is called but i saw it on the Discovery ch.-and mammoths weren't so nice either)

Don't get me wrong, they were all pretty good movies, (Lost World my favorite), but the dinos aren't so impressive anymore (despite their boost in realism on JP III)

Originally posted by gls
well, it doesn't necessarily have to be called jurrassic park to be a sequal. Like the upcoming Jumanji sequal "Zathura"
yea, i doubt it'll have things other than dinos, but still aren't you sick of them too?

There were others, like the weird pelican looking animal that had a razor sharp beak that ate meat (forgot what it is called but i saw it on the Discovery ch.-and mammoths weren't so nice either)

Don't get me wrong, they were all pretty good movies, (Lost World my favorite), but the dinos aren't so impressive anymore (despite their boost in realism on JP III)

Originally posted by Aldaron
I'm not sick of the Dinos I'm sick of the way JP/// was handled. Well Steven Speilberg will be either Director or Excutive Producer so I'm sure that JPIV will be true to the Trilogy. well Jurassic Park was named after the Middle Period that took place in the Mezoic Era. Besides if any Ice Aged animals were in JPIV and not Dinos they're be an up-rising among JP Fans both Movie and Book. Boost in realism? JP/// was never closed to it, it had many flaws. As far as I'm concered every JP Fan knows the Dinos are still very impressive.

they did look better in the third movie, a little at least. I was impressed with the Pterodactyl in the third one (the big mom).
Maybe instead of a direct sequal they'll have a spinoff of JP with the other animals, while still continuing the Dinos in JP?

who knows.

Originally posted by gls
they did look better in the third movie, a little at least. I was impressed with the Pterodactyl in the third one (the big mom).
Maybe instead of a direct sequal they'll have a spinoff of JP with the other animals, while still continuing the Dinos in JP?

who knows.

I don't think a sequel is a good idea, but then again when is it a good idea? I dont' know, but if they do I get the feeling I'm going to be going to see. Just like I do with all sequels....I need some more willpower

And their making a sequel to Jamanji??? Going a bit overboard with this aren't they?

oh good lord, another bunch of rich dumba$$es going into a "park" full of man eating dinosaurs. don't they have news there. i say nuke the damn park this time around!!!

They should have never made 2 or 3, never mind 4!!!!

Originally posted by DemonicGambit-2
I don't think a sequel is a good idea, but then again when is it a good idea?

Godfather 2 and the Austin Powers movies.

Originally posted by DemonicGambit-2
I don't think a sequel is a good idea, but then again when is it a good idea?

Never!! 😮‍💨

Austin Powers movies

way to prove his point for him..........

I think part 2 and 3 are better than the original. And you couldn't call Godfather 2 a bad idea because it was good.

Jurassic Park, The Lost World: Jurassic Park are the best of all three. Also /// sucked it had to many flaws, would of been better if Steven directed it.

My vote is Man-eating Passenger Pigeons and Dodo Birds!!