An In-depth Look into Sexual Attractiveness in Humans.

Started by dadudemon2 pages

An In-depth Look into Sexual Attractiveness in Humans.

This may seem like a lot but read it ALL! This should effectively kill most current and future relationship type threads.

Anthropologist Helen Fisher, through her studies, has believes in three separate rules for the mating game.

1. Lust-The sex drive-sexual gratification.

2. Romantic Love-Our adoration for the one partner seems to be all that we seek.

3. Attachment-The way we develop a secure union with a long term partner.

She believes all three are evolutionary traits of reproductive success.

Attachment allows for a child to be born and raised at least through infancy.

She is also conducting research from “recruits” from the campus of the StoneyBrook University NY.

They are using fMRIs to scan blood flow to the brain of people who think they are in love. They first show a picture of a neutral image to the person and then scan the blood flow in the brain. They then show the person an image of the person’s lover and scan again.

This is what was discovered in that study:

Men are turned on visually.

Women are turned on by character.

Quote, “Among our male subjects, we found activity in the brain region more associated with the integration of visual stimuli. In our female subjects, we found more activity with the region more associated with memory recall.”

For men, visual stimuli activate the brain more than they do for women, and are important for the sexual pleasure for a man.

Helen said, “Women do like to look but men, like to look more and I feel that this is due to a profoundly powerful Darwinian reason.”

What are men looking for?

Researchers were sent out to the streets of London to demonstrate a classic psychology experiment.

The researchers mission was to ask men which of 4 drawings were most attractive.
The female figures were virtually identical. The female figures had very small differences; the hip size was the difference. They liked the women that had a waste to hip ratio of 7/10; a woman’s waist who has a size ration of 7/10 precisely. A woman with a 26 inch waist would have 37 inch hips:they are thought more likely to be able to bare babies, more likely to get pregnant, live longer, and have fewer miss carriages.

Well formed lips, sizeable cheeks, and sizeable breasts are also markers of sexual attractiveness: all of those traits are controlled by the sex hormones: they are called hormonal markers.

Professor Randy Thornill of the University of New Mexico studies biology, specifically how our bodies display sexual attractiveness.

He said that our bodies are basically signals of symmetry and signals of hormones. He said, “…attractiveness is a collection of signals of both symmetry and hormone signals.”

Size of the breasts and fat deposits in the upper cheeks and lips are substantially shaped by bodily levels of the hormone estrogen.

Estrogen also affects the secondary characteristics of sexuality at puberty. Professor Thornhill said, “Estrogen is a marker of the quality of the female and that includes her reductive capacity; that includes her ability to bare children and is all highly estrogen related in women.”

Testosterone causes several visual features at the onset of puberty such as cheek bones that are prominent, strong jaw, a muscular physique, and broad shoulders. These masculine features are markers for virility and health in a human male.

Also, another sexually attractive trait in males is the dominant markers.

Dominance in males is associated with male reproductive success.

In 2004, $13 billion was spent on cosmetic procedures; 90% carried out on women.
A younger female fertile and fully developed female is considered more attractive, the vast majority of the time, to any male. Variances to the above marker are almost always attributed to psychological disorders such as pedophilia. (Unnatural lust.)

Men get cosmetic things done as well but because women, more than men, seek out other attributes for sexual reproduction other than the appearance they are given by natures default.
For women, the ideal male mate is more than just a source of fertile sperm. They are more attracted to intangible characteristics such as loyalty, kindness, which suggest a good husband and good father for her children.

Women have more blood flowing to the part of the brain called the hippocampus, the part of the brain associated with memory. What does memory have to do with sexual attraction and a woman’s love life? Helen Fisher suggests that women are particularly interested in the men’s’ character and that they build up a memory map of their behavior in order to determine if they will be a suitable mate and a good father for their children.

Memory is vitally important. Women are more likely to contact others about their interactions with the opposite sex. Women also look for status in men so that they and their children can be provided for. Men advertise this status to attract mates. (Think Peacock type males.)

Healthy offspring are the key to a status of attraction which leads to stranger findings.

Professor Randy Thornhill believes that we interpret sexual signals in milliseconds; without even knowing.

The human nose is part of the sexual attraction of the opposite sex. This is how Thornhill found this out:
He gets a group of men together for a game of basketball wearing white shirts. The shirts are freshly laundered. As the players play basketball, the shirts absorb sweat and sweat contains pheromones.

Thornhill has discovered that pheromones convey far more complex information than previously believed when it comes to sexual attractiveness. In his biology lab, Thornhill asks a group of students to test the pheromone idea out. The women will smell each shirt and rate them for sexiness, pleasantness, and intensity. The women do not know who the shirt is from. They write down their judgments, based on nothing more than smell. Thornhill has analyzed the immunes systems of the both male and female volunteers, by studying the major histo-compatibility complex..(Called MHC.)

A group of genes play an important role in the human body immune response system. He discovered that women prefer the smell of scent of a male with a most different MHC. This makes good evolutionary sense. A better range of genes in reproduction contributes to a species success. The babies get the best of the “mix”.

Human beings are able to pick a suitable genetic mate with just their noses!

Our noses can also detect symmetry..It may seem bizarre but women can smell who are symmetrical. More symmetric men smell better to women. Even more than that, they prefer symmetrical manly looking men even more when they are at the peak of their menstrual cycle.

Researchers in the 90s did several studies on symmetry. They collected many photos and analyzed how symmetrical the faces were in the photos and then presented those photos to people to rate on a scale of 1-10. The faces most attractive were those that were most symmetrical. What’s strange is that a face that is completely symmetrical (Basically, a computer is used to “mirror” one side of the face so that both sides are a perfect mirror reflection of each other.)is unattractive.

Faces also display information about our immune system. Symmetry is marker of how healthy and individual is because it is very hard in nature to “get it right”. Apparently, parasites and disease contribute to an asymmetrical face. They also found that men that were rated higher by the women had a greater variety of genes and also had a stronger immune system. (Bi-racial men and women are found, often, to be attractive for a reason; it is not specific preference.)

This is the section on some scientific advices to make you more attractive to the opposite sex.

A powerful arsenal of chemicals manipulates our decisions when we are in the “sex game” without us even realizing it.

Lust is driven by the hormone testosterone.

Also, fear seemed to be a marker for increased attractiveness. An average looking women approached men on a bridge that was suspended very high up and was wobbly. She asked them to fill out a very brief survey and then told them to call her and she wrote her number on a piece of paper and tore it off and gave it to them. The same thing was repeated on a ground level, safe, solid, and concrete bridge. They responded via phone to the fear inducing bridge four times as much as the “safe” bridge; confirming that fear and sexual arousal are connected. (In both sexual arousal and fear, the pupils dilate, heart rate increases, breathing increase, and adrenalin is released.) This may indicate why some dates succeed when men take women to see and do frightening things like certain movies and the amusement park…they want to scare women into liking them.

Gazing into each other’s eyes is a marker of being attracted to each other. That is why candle light dinners are popular sometimes. The bigger the size of the pupil, the more attractive the person is. Apparently, when you are excited about meeting an interesting and new partner, your body releases adrenaline; this causes the diameter of the pupil to double in size. So when one sees a dilated pupil, we subconsciously realize that the person is attracted to us and we are attracted to that.

Some things are always true when you date. Looking intelligent and being kind.

Sexual selection is not blind-dumb natural selection, it is driven by nature and has many many “triggers” for hundreds of thousands of years, our ancestors started selecting partners based on intelligence; as a result our intelligence started to grow.; hence why we are so intelligent. We owe our science, art, and various creative inventions, to our evolutionary ancestors who selected partners that were more intelligent and resourceful in their survival traits.

In human culture, kindness is universally attractive and is one indicator of good sexual partner because of the children that come into play during the relationship.

The top two again, are Intelligence and kindness; kindness more so than intellect.
Kindness is an indicator of good genes. (Not enough space to go into the lengthy details there.)

Romantic love is not intangible; it is measurable by science.

They wanted to discover if romantic love and lust were different so they compared the fMRIs of the people who were self confessed to be in love with those people who said they were not in love. They discovered that a region of the brain known as the caudate appears to be activated when a person is in love.

It is part of the brains complex reward system (The caudate). It appears that being in love affects the brain the same way that certain illegal drugs do. Hence why when a person, who claims to very intensely be in love, looks at an image of the one they say they love, their brain responds very much the same way one does when they take cocaine.

You may be familiar with what hormone is involved in cocaine and in love: dopamine.

Elevated levels of dopamine produce extreme levels of motivation and un-wavered attention. Sounds a little bit like love, doesn’t it?

This is why men and women seem to depend on their partner when they claim to be in love with them.

Romantic love is a biological reality so that the couples will want to have sex with one another enough to get the female pregnant. Brains have evolved so that we have a human need to fall in love to increase the success of the species.

This chemical love attraction is not enough to keep people together. We have to stick together long enough to produce successful offspring. We are bombarded with more than one chemical at a time to keep us together.

Are we biologically predestined to stay together or to be cheaters?

Are humans biologically programmed to cheat? 97 % of mammals are not monogamous, how do we as humans stay together then?

Dr. Gian Gonzaga from UCLA has shown in a groundbreaking study that we react to the environment we are in. In his study, he shows why some people stay with their partner and way some stray.
Gonzaga selected students who were in a relationship.

He asked them to choose a picture, out of many, of someone they find very attractive.

He asks them to write an essay while thinking of their own partner in a lustful way. They are instructed that each time they are thinking of the picture they should put a check in the margin. He then asks the students to write another essay. This time, in a loving way about their partner; again, they are to put a check mark every time they think of the person in the picture in any way. Doing the “loving” essay produced far fewer checks and those who reported to more frequent cheating also reported more checks in the “love” essay.

What his shows is that love, so to speak, does bind us together. But it is in a constant battle with the emotion of lust, and even subconsciously, some have predispositions to cheating. Whether it is psychological or genetic is unknown at this point as the scope of this study was psychological only.

Desire is a tricky thing. It has been shown that sometimes, when desire has been pointed at your committed partner, desire can sometimes make you less committed to them.

To sum up, love helps you get rid of the problem of lust so that you stay with one partner and raise children.

It all fits back in with Helen Fishers belief of long term attachment.

How does it do it? The body has a natural love potion that sticks you together with your partner. Your body releases a hormone called oxytocin, a hormone and neuro-transmitter produced in the brain. It was once thought that oxytocin only functioned to induce labor in pregnant women and helped them produce milk. Oxytocin affects both women and men and acts as a sexual arousal hormone and that signals orgasm and prompts cuddling before, during, and after orgasm; hence its other name: the cuddling chemical.

It also may function to strengthen the bond between couples. It has been shown that the more oxytosin that is released, the deeper the bond that is developed, that basically means more sex. That isn’t everything though.

Vasopressin, released during sex, has a critical role in the long term commitment stage. Prairie Voles are among the 3% of mammals that mate for life. This hormone is released in prairie Voles when they mate; just as in humans. This hormone reacts with the reward center of the brain when they mate, similarly to humans when they mate. This triggers a found memory with that specific mate in both humans and Prairie Voles.

In closing, love is simply the continuation of our species.

For those interesting, a lot of this information came from the National Geographic program “Naked Science” the episode is called What’s Sexy?: Secrets of Sexual attraction.

my eyes hurt.

I read about the first 1/3 of it, it was interesting, but I have to get ready for school and ran out of time.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
my eyes hurt.

my brain hurts.

Interseting, though.

Although I'm not sure what my opinion on it is.

To sum up- a nice ass.

Originally posted by dadudemon They wanted to discover if romantic love and lust were different so they compared the fMRIs of the people who were self confessed to be in love with those people who said they were not in love. They discovered that a region of the brain known as the caudate appears to be activated when a person is in love.

It is part of the brains complex reward system (The caudate). It appears that being in love affects the brain the same way that certain illegal drugs do. Hence why when a person, who claims to very intensely be in love, looks at an image of the one they say they love, their brain responds very much the same way one does when they take cocaine.

[/B]

can u imagine falling in love with someone, but the society around you says no, or assumes b/c you look a certain way and so does he, that it has to be solely about lust? can u imagine?

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
can u imagine?

Yeah, I can.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
To sum up- a nice ass.
Pretty obvious when you think about it.

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
can u imagine falling in love with someone, but the society around you says no, or assumes b/c you look a certain way and so does he, that it has to be solely about lust? can u imagine?
Originally posted by Devil King
Yeah, I can.

Now, that was truly funny.

I have to say this is a pretty impressive article. and I do agree with it.

There several mistakes in what I wrote up...I wrote this up very fast, all at once late last night and into the early morning. (I am in Central Standard Time so I posted this at about 1:30 am. It took about an hour to write that up.)

I apologize for those mistakes. Still an interesting read, though. I think everyone should make time to read it all...if not all of it...at least the second part which gives away some scientific secrets for dating and attracting a mate.

Edit-Needless to say, I am keeping this write-up in case I have to write a paper in college; it would save me time.

I just thought of this joke:

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
To sum up- a nice ass.
no shit

You've been working on that for a while now, haven't you?

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
You've been working on that for a while now, haven't you?

I could care less.

Originally posted by BackFire
I could care less.

You ****ing, **** idiot **** ****.

Watch the potty mouth, honey.

Re: An In-depth Look into Sexual Attractiveness in Humans.

Originally posted by dadudemon
This may seem like a lot but read it ALL! This should effectively kill most current and future relationship type threads.

I did read it all; no it won't.

Originally posted by BackFire
Watch the potty mouth, honey.

N-no.

I peed myself and cut off my assh0le by trying to read that quilt of words.