 |
Eli Vanto
Tactical Prodigy
Registered: Jan 2020
Location: Chiss Defense Fleet
|
What is more difficult for a Jedi to defend against?
1. An opponent dual wielding individual lightsabers (like Ahsoka)
2. An opponent wielding a double bladed lightsaber (like Maul)
__________________

|
Dec 6th, 2020 06:19 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
NewGuy01
perpetual
Registered: Jan 2013
Location: USA
|
Depends on the Jedi.
__________________

|
Dec 6th, 2020 08:10 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Freedon Nadd
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: Romania
|
Boba Fett.
__________________
RealistRacism: "Sheevites, much like the Banites, were meant to increase in power with each member. From Lightsnake to Gideon to Azronger, this was supposed to be the case. However, knowledge must've been lost in some kind of Gravid-like incident, as Az turned out to be a mid-tier debater with a sub-par track record, sh!itting all over Tempest's legacy. Sad."
|
Dec 9th, 2020 10:36 AM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Underachiever59
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2017
Location:
|
It should be harder to defend against an opponent wielding two separate lightsabers. Two separate lightsabers can attack simultaneously from completely different vectors. Meanwhile, a double-bladed lightsaber actually reduces attack options (For example, a perfectly vertical overhead strike wouldn't work with a double-bladed lightsaber, you would impale yourself), and as long as you know where one blade is, you know the other blade is facing in the exact opposite direction.
There's no question in my mind that a duel-wielding opponent should realistically be more deadly than an opponent with a double-sided lightsaber.
|
Jan 5th, 2021 06:07 AM |
|
|
|  |
 |
All times are UTC. The time now is 09:26 PM. |
|
|
|  |
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
Text-only version |
|
|