Advent, in your own words: "Clearly you have a hard time comprehending basic words". This is ROTS Grievous in other words, General grievous from Star wars Episode 3: Revenge of the Sith. Everything single thing about Grievous that you posted was about EU Grievous. So your entire post is moot. Also, Maul wasn't at his full strength when he was able to match Qui-Gon and Kenobi, 2 on 1.
__________________
Last edited by darthsith19 on Apr 10th, 2007 at 10:40 PM
sigh ok, since you like bane and want to stay in this forum debating, theres nothing i can do. Well since you like bane so much why not put up either one of these avatars
[insert picture of naked man with Darth Bane mask #1]
or
[insert picture of naked man with Darth Bane mask #2]
Just resize them
O yes and im trying to be nice, so dont snap it
...
Seriously, that's just weird.
Last edited by Apollo Cloud on Apr 10th, 2007 at 10:44 PM
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Picking up some power converters.
He took the time to get pictures of naked men (two, I might add), and photoshopped them? That's... creepy beyond belief.
However, since I don't have to look at naked men, and you do have a mild Bane obsession, I'm calling it fuuny. However, Kadesh gets no credit, seeing as he took the time to look at naked men to do it (unless Kadesh is homosexual, then... no, still no credit).
I don't see where I've suggested otherwise, as a matter of fact. "Losing to ROTS Obi-Wan is hardly a negative for Grievous, btw.", and in the actual post I do acknowledge the fight in RotS, so nice try.
Clearly you have a hard time comprehending anything:
How is that anywhere remotely close to invalid? RotS Grievous is still: a) physically stronger than Maul, b) faster than Maul, and c) more wild and far more unpredictable than TPM Kenobi. Furthermore, his body is still nigh impenetrable by the human fist. Again, you're just proving what an utter moron you are by making such a sweeping generalization, and trying to jump the gun to correct me (hint: it won't happen).
Oh, and proof that there's any sort of major gap in between RotS Grievous and CW Grievous? If there was, then perhaps you'd have a point, but until then (never), my argument stands. Not only that, but even if there was, the relative ease of which Grievous performed those feats suggests that he's capable of taking said victims down in his RotS incarnation without exerting himself in the least bit (save for the battle on Hypori), so they are still apart of the actual point, as in context to this fight, Darth Maul wouldn't be able to do such so easily.
How about elaborating, as this makes absolutely no sense, nor does it have anything to do with what I said, because it's the mere fact that he was surprised, and the like. I'll go into this further, if you can come up with a decent argument, but as it seems now, it's [your 'point' here] rather worthless.
__________________
"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent." - Sagacious Jedi Master Qui-Gon Jinn.
Advent, yes, you did say valid things about Darth Maul, but everything that you stated about Grievous, in your original post, is moot.
The quote about Maul not being at full strength is from The New Essential Guide to Characters. I'll post the quote here later tonight, I have to go now.
I just had a thought, i don't think Mauls double bladed lightsaber, will do good against GG four lightsabers, i just keep picturing it and don't see Maul standing a chance, i think he would do better, with just 1. I could be wrong, though.
And Dartsith19, there is to little people on your site(at least, the last time i checked), if it was more, i would join.
__________________
General G made this sig, but i am going to keep annoying him.
According to you, my "entire post" was invalid, ergo you're a contradicting dumbass who doesn't know how to properly word his sentences. Moreover, the points weren't about just Darth Maul, they were about Grievous, and how he's got x and y quality over Darth Maul when we take a comparison of a different situation. So, as you mention below, "everything (I) stated about Grievous is moot" is completely wrong, because those points are about Grievous.
And not only that, but how is this about the droid general in the Expanded Universe...
...when it happened in RotS? Learn2properlycomprehendbeforemakinggeneralstateme
ntssoyoudontlooklikeacompleteandutter****ingtool.
Plus,
How is that 'moot' in the least bit? He is more intelligent, and there's only a handful of Jedi [in the PT] that can defeat him in bladed combat.
__________________
"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent." - Sagacious Jedi Master Qui-Gon Jinn.
Last edited by Advent on Apr 10th, 2007 at 11:22 PM
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Picking up some power converters.
I doubt Greivous is smarter than Maul, Advent. Greivous is a mastermind, but Maul is an extremely talented individual, took out the Black Sun by causing them to fight amongst themselves, and was trained to be "smarter than any foe could anticipate" by Sidious.
I don't really care, because nothing suggests otherwise. Plus, like I said when I tore your argument in the other thread to shreds, if the world relied on what you do or don't think, we'd be in trouble.
General Grievous is a vastly skilled tactician, who lead the CIS to numerous victories against the Republic. Darth Maul is not, has not, and as it seems, cannot. I'm not seeing how Darth "At last we will reveal ourselves to the Jedi. At last we will have revenge" Maul has a damn thing on Grievous.
No, he didn't, unless this is 'fighting amongst themselves':
"I've come to kill you. All of you"...try learning what you're talking about first, James, as you'll find it does you no good to mix things up - only makes you look foolish. He pit two mining operations each other using stealth (wow, that says a lot!). Now, how does that prove he's more intelligent than someone like General Grievous, who wasn't chosen to be the supreme commander of the CIS for his good looks?
Hyperbole, anyone? I could bring out all the displays of his brilliance, and quotes, too. Plus, what exactly does that prove? If that is true, it doesn't mean much except they expect the near mute Sith to be as dumb as an ox. It doesn't put him above, or anywhere remotely close to Grievous, not even Obi-Wan, FFS.
Edit:
What the hell is it with all these morons trying to correct me lately? I need to get some anti-idiot repellant, these bastards are annoying as hell.
__________________
"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent." - Sagacious Jedi Master Qui-Gon Jinn.
Last edited by Advent on Apr 10th, 2007 at 11:48 PM