superstrongguys and their heights and weights?

heres a height scale i made that takes into account proprtion of chatecters by slapping sum images together

Juggs isn't upright there. And Wolverine is shorter than anyone there...he shouldn't be equal with Pete, Bob and Norrin.

Not bad though.

jugg upright woudl be hulk's height, and we all now that wolverine is not 5ft3 most of his images show him near pete's height etc i would say about 5ft6/7

Strange thread.

Thor is defiantly the most strongest pound for pound.

Shaggy Man 12ft tall but only 1000 pounds...
http://img118.imageshack.us/my.php?image=shaggyfound2vc8.jpg

Originally posted by Priest
Thor is defiantly the most strongest pound for pound.

No he's not, take a look at Hercules' strenght/weight ratio.

i redid the wizard power chart .......... any thoughts or suggestion for the stats:

The order is debatable the stats are COMPLETELY wrong.

Basically Wizard sucks.

no wolverine is diffiently 5'3

kitty pryde is taller then him lol

Originally posted by Battlehammer
no wolverine is diffiently 5'3

kitty pryde is taller then him lol

also, in the movies, he was 6'3

Originally posted by Master-Borg
yeah but he is often drawn to be about 5'8 - 5'9

also, in the movies, he was 6'3

some times, but he often shown as smaller as well.

ya well it a movie. not many famous 5'3 actors that are male lol

Originally posted by Battlehammer

ya well it a movie. not many famous 5'3 actors that are male lol

true...but they didn't have to pick a giant (Hugh Jackman), there are many average to short guys in hollywood

Originally posted by Master-Borg
true...but they didn't have to pick a giant (Hugh Jackman), there are many average to short guys in hollywood

that would look like wolverine. Not really.

also if your not going to get a 5'3 wolverine why bother picking ators for there height.

..........also the movie was extremely inaccurate the hieghts was the least of which

Originally posted by Battlehammer

also if your not going to get a 5'3 wolverine why bother picking ators for there height.

because being short is a KEY CHARACTERISTIC of what makes Wolverine stand out. its very important to the portrayal of his character...he's always been called a runt.

most superheroes are 6'2 or above, a few are 5'10...but Logan is 5'3...I think it was an IMPORTANT feature for the creators to his character.

Originally posted by Master-Borg
because being short is a KEY CHARACTERISTIC of what makes Wolverine stand out. its very important to the portrayal of his character...he's always been called a runt.

most superheroes are 6'2 or above, a few are 5'10...but Logan is 5'3...I think it was an IMPORTANT feature for the creators to his character.

not really when the entire movie was completely inaccurate.

There was a lot more important things wrong with the movie then logan hieghts.

do you want me to name them all?

Originally posted by Battlehammer
not really when the entire movie was completely inaccurate.

There was a lot more important things wrong with the movie then logan hieghts.

do you want me to name them all?

Originally posted by Master-Borg
no not really, i dont care what other inaccuracies it had...it doesn't make it right for them to make Logan 6'3

who cares that was the least of the movies problems.

I mean for one his sabertooth origin was completely off.

He was shown with little to no MA skill.

He was shown with only human strength.

man I could go on and on.

Originally posted by Battlehammer

He was shown with only human strength.

only human strength? 🤨 he threw Logan like 30 feet with one hand

Originally posted by Master-Borg
only human strength? 🤨 he threw Logan like 30 feet with one hand

your talking about the second movie in which he throw those to solider like 3 feet..........

he was also shown to struggle with a human soldier in strength..............

He had to actauly try in cage fight...............verse a normal guy.

it was pathetic how his strength,speed,agility,skills and so forth were all portrayed