some me him fighting the entire x-mne line up with out being hurt at all. Simply becuase somethign is stated randomly does not make it so. It the same as taking spiderman saying sentry pwned galactus as evidence. It simply a statement made with no context given nor evidence of the event ever being shown.
he never beaten the entire x-men line up before with out getting hurt.
There a reason why it hyperbole. There no one pannel evidence to support him ever doing it, all there is, is this statement made about the event. Which is pretty much the deffinition of hyperbole.
it like trying to argue sentry beating galactus as a legitment feta based off statement made by spidy.
though I actually believe he beat the entire x-men team given what team it was, that statement no more then hyperbole with out context or on pannel showing.
Sentry never beat Galactus, didn't Spiderman say he stalemated him?
Also Nate Grey was there, we don't know how hungry Galactus was, and Sentry has been steadily revealing himself to be a beast while still not being as strong as he used to be.
There no reason to assume it did happen given how many rediculous statements people have made over the years, like spiderman saying not even thor could lift this, or wolverine stateing the second best fighter in the word is yuiko ect.
Thats not really on pannel evidence of it happening, that spiderman saying something and given his track record for redciulous comments, it means veyr little.
Hyperbole is a statement made with out the event ever being shown, which is just that statement about glads and spidermans statement about sentry. It statements made, but not backed by any on pannel evidence of the event transpiring.
KMC Community Forums
Mar 23rd, 2010 02:59 AM
