KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Movies » Movie Discussion » Blue Valentine - Why the NC-17 rating?

Blue Valentine - Why the NC-17 rating?
Started by: ScaryGerry

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
ScaryGerry
Member

Gender:
Location: United States

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
\
Also have a feeling this "NC-17, but wanting an R" is made-up shit to gather interest and boost earnings. IIRC, Basic Instinct had similar nonsense, when it was nothing more than the barest peak at Stone's semi-fuzzy tw-t. Big deal.


Haha, I actually made the same argument, that the controversy might bring the film more attention. But I think Simon makes a good point, a lot of venues/stores will choose against showing it/carrying it, simply because of its rating.

Old Post Nov 23rd, 2010 11:25 PM
ScaryGerry is currently offline Click here to Send ScaryGerry a Private Message Find more posts by ScaryGerry Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

quote: (post)
Originally posted by SimonComics
But it isn't made up. If they get an NC-17, that's the kiss of death: few chains will carry the movie either in theaters or in rental stores. And the REASON for the NC-17 rating is garbage... part of the MPAA's usual "violence OK, sex bad" approach.


My angle was that they won't get an NC-17; they know this and that it's just a ploy to garnish attention ahead of time, which will ultimately help sales once it's released as an 'R'. Weinstein has enough influence to make sure his film isn't NC-17.

You're dead right about the 'violence and sex' and the MPAA, you can show a man being gutting and cannibalized, but show a penis; you're doomed. But in the end, the MPAA does what the major studios tell them too/pay them off. We could both make a similar film depicting violence and sex, you from an small independent studio, me from one of the major ones, you'll likely get far harsher treatment for the same material.


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Last edited by Robtard on Nov 23rd, 2010 at 11:36 PM

Old Post Nov 23rd, 2010 11:33 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
SimonComics
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Texas

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
My angle was that they won't get an NC-17; they know this and that it's just a ploy to garnish attention ahead of time, which will ultimately help sales once it's released as an 'R'. Weinstein has enough influence to make sure his film isn't NC-17.

You're dead right about the 'violence and sex' and the MPAA, you can show a man being gutting and cannibalized, but show a penis; you're doomed. But in the end, the MPAA does what the major studios tell them too/pay them off. We could both make a similar film depicting violence and sex, you from an small independent studio, me from one of the major ones, you'll likely get far harsher treatment for the same material.


Well, Weinstein is CHALLENGING the rating -- which means they DID get it, and they're trying to get the R instead. The MPAA might say something if Weinstein was just plain fabricating the situation, and it's unlikely the actors would be so open about the whole situation if it was just some PR move.


__________________
I got a million problems but glowsticking ain't one.

Old Post Nov 24th, 2010 08:48 PM
SimonComics is currently offline Click here to Send SimonComics a Private Message Find more posts by SimonComics Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

You're not understanding my angle, ie they're in cahoots.


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Old Post Nov 24th, 2010 08:58 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
SnakeEyes
Connoisseur

Gender: Male
Location: AMERICA

I think your angle is kinda ridiculous, personally. Slightly more people might hear about this film now as a side-effect of the NC-17 rating, but I highly doubt it's at all deliberate. This isn't some big blockbuster film, it's going to get a limited release and the people who are going to see it already know about it. An NC-17 rating does nothing but hurt the film and the MPAA does this kind of thing ALL the time.


__________________


"Nothing is ever as good as you can imagine it."

Last edited by SnakeEyes on Nov 25th, 2010 at 03:48 AM

Old Post Nov 25th, 2010 03:42 AM
SnakeEyes is currently offline Click here to Send SnakeEyes a Private Message Find more posts by SnakeEyes Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
SimonComics
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Texas

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
You're not understanding my angle, ie they're in cahoots.


In what way does the MPAA benefit from being made to look bad, stodgy, and out of touch?


__________________
I got a million problems but glowsticking ain't one.

Old Post Nov 29th, 2010 08:48 PM
SimonComics is currently offline Click here to Send SimonComics a Private Message Find more posts by SimonComics Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

quote: (post)
Originally posted by SnakeEyes
I think your angle is kinda ridiculous, personally.


I'm fine with that. You might even be right.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by SimonComics
In what way does the MPAA benefit from being made to look bad, stodgy, and out of touch?


They're already seen as "bad, stodgy, and out of touch." Have been for decades.


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Old Post Nov 29th, 2010 09:19 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
SimonComics
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Texas

quote: (post)



They're already seen as "bad, stodgy, and out of touch." Have been for decades. [/B]


Yes, and.. why would they agree to perpetuate that?

It's just an angle that has nothing but cynicism as proof.


__________________
I got a million problems but glowsticking ain't one.

Old Post Nov 30th, 2010 08:10 PM
SimonComics is currently offline Click here to Send SimonComics a Private Message Find more posts by SimonComics Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

quote: (post)
Originally posted by SimonComics
Yes, and.. why would they agree to perpetuate that?

It's just an angle that has nothing but cynicism as proof.


And?


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Old Post Nov 30th, 2010 08:57 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
SimonComics
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Texas

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
And?


Therefore it's a crappy, baseless argument? That seems to be the natural conclusion to me.


__________________
I got a million problems but glowsticking ain't one.

Old Post Dec 1st, 2010 07:44 PM
SimonComics is currently offline Click here to Send SimonComics a Private Message Find more posts by SimonComics Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

quote: (post)
Originally posted by SimonComics
Therefore it's a crappy, baseless argument? That seems to be the natural conclusion to me.


Bet you feel better about yourself now.


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Old Post Dec 2nd, 2010 12:07 AM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
SimonComics
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Texas

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
Bet you feel better about yourself now.


Just trying to figure out what exactly you're doing, going from "this is my argument" to "so what if my argument sucks?" to "don't you feel good about pointing that out?"

Not sure why you feel the need to be hostile about it. Just can't figure out the behavior.


__________________
I got a million problems but glowsticking ain't one.

Old Post Dec 2nd, 2010 08:31 PM
SimonComics is currently offline Click here to Send SimonComics a Private Message Find more posts by SimonComics Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

I-I'm the one being hostile here? LoLz.


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Old Post Dec 3rd, 2010 01:23 AM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 09:02 PM.
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Movies » Movie Discussion » Blue Valentine - Why the NC-17 rating?

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.