So no proof again Long turd just speculation on your part, your b*tching in every Thanos thread or about Thanos in general is getting old now. Stick to making Butthurt threads because this kind of thing makes you look like a rabid crackhead
Magus didn't punch him with full power. He held back. This is known due to him trying to punish Thanos in order to get him to admit something. He wasn't trying to kill him at all.
He was trying to harm/injure him for sure, even though he held back the power he was packing was far beyond any physical hit Thanos has took from anyone.
I aslo noticed you ignored the other feats I named as the kill your argument.
Classic Grundy was able to own pre-crisis Superman as easily as he did, because his punches contain magical energies (of which affected Supes just as much as Kryptonite, back in the day):
I'm not saying classic Grundy still wasn't insanely powerful (he did own the entire pre-crisis JLA with a fair amount of ease, after all) - but we just can't use his owning of pre-crisis Supes as a gauge for how he'd do vs. Thanos.
He wanted Thanos to be coherent enough to admit. Thus it wasn't hard enough to ko Thanos.
The other feats are garbage as to why I ignored them. How does any of them compared to taking Celestial beams or Destroyers beam?
The point was to show that energy durability is not the same as blunt force durability.
You put Thor in Thanos place and Thor would be fine as well. Hell Thor was fine when Mangog hit him hundreds to thousands of times and we all know how powerful Classic Mangog was.
Lol you're just a idiot troll who arguments fail on the premise of using Thor when Thanos has been shown to be above Thor when he dropped him with two eye beams, so I guess using your logic Thanos eye beam>>>>Celestial/Destroyer then and that was a weaker pre res Thanos.
I see you continue to dissregard feats as crap because you don't like them or haven't read the story.
Tell you what to end your BS, me you Battlezone loser leaves kmc
That is not even my logic. You claimed Thanos has uber physical blunt durability because of his fight with Odin. I merely stated that energy projection durability is not the same as physical blunt durability for the reasons I gave with Thor.
As for Thanos having greater physical blunt durability than Thor, I agree that it is but only slightly. This is because I see Thor surviving the same physical hits that Thanos received IN COMICS. Hell Thor survived far worst IMO.
But Thanos wins because of his other powers. A pure slug fest would be different though.
Stop lying h1, I never said Thanos blunt force durability was as good BECAUSE of the Odin energy projection showing, is said it was because of his blunt force showings themselves.
Look, I got a baseball bat see, and if i take a full speed swing at someone's head it's more than likey going to kill him. But if i tap him with the same bat, is that going to have the same results? No, that's exactly what Magus did, he tapped him.
You mad? Don't get so worked up, you might lose focus and allow a Thanos nut to slip out of your mouth. Squeeze them nuts, baby. ......you little fanboy.
In your baseball bat anology do you have the power of a abstract and the power the merge 2 universes? No that's why your anology fails hard as the power Magus had even using a fraction of it is far greater than most using full power
I am saying that just because one has the power doesn't mean they will have to use all of it to get someone's attention. Magus being an abstract will have even greater control on the use of his power than me tapping someone with a bat. So he would use just enough of the power to get thanos attention without killing him.
Same thing with play fighting. Those punches won't hurt as much as the ones in a real fight.
KMC Community Forums
May 19th, 2011 10:41 AM
You mad? 
Don't get so worked up, you might lose focus and allow a Thanos nut to slip out of your mouth. Squeeze them nuts, baby. ......you little fanboy.
