I honestly find it difficult to even picture Thor with a 20x strength amp. Even on average, with this much of an amp, Thor should go around accidentally destroying planets with a tap. On high end portrayals, a non amped Thor can operate very far up the food chain.
I am taking a look at the polls and I am shocked by the results; at this moment half you think this is spite (spite against Thor that is) and that Thor with x20 strength and significantly enhanced durability gets owned just like the other Heralds did!??
Really??
In the state presented in the OP, Thor is a bonafide Trans Tier character bare minimum; how the heck does he get owned just like Surfer and the other Heralds as a result?
In my honest opinion, option2...the one where he out performs the Heralds, but does worse than Thanos...should be the worse performance Thor could have against DP Tyrant in this senario.
For those of you who picked Thor gets Spite'ed...and own up to your vote...explain why Thor does no better than the Heralds did.
__________________
Last edited by TheLordofMurder on May 23rd, 2011 at 02:40 PM
This is just silly. Even with the Amp... Tyrant would still put down Thor and that would be that. Thor might be stronger, but he durability STILL wouldn't be able to hold up against Tyrant. Thor goes down and its not pretty
Honestly, please for God's sake don't bring up Exitar as if that isn't PIS or a normal thor showing. Odin with the backing of ALL the skyfather/uni-mind in the Destroyer got punked by a WEAKER celestial than Thor did well against... Nah.. just not buying it.
I'm not talking about the armor destroying feat or his God Blast at the moment; I am talking about the buff to Thors damage soak the Battle Armor will give him...
I think it will give him the ability to sustain punishment from Tyrant significantly better than the other Heralds did; I personally (unlike a few here) dont think Thor can win this fight...
I think Tyrant eventually gets serious and blasts Thors Asgardian Batlle Armor into smitherines and kills him, but Thor should out perform the other Heralds bare minimum...
__________________
Last edited by TheLordofMurder on May 23rd, 2011 at 03:47 PM
The spite contingent is obviously biased, but the "Thor destroys" folks haven't demonstrated that the multiplier given by warrior madness is accurate. Thor's amps will make him stronger, but 20x seems incredibly dubious.
I don't think it's spite at all, in fact, I voted for Thor doing better than Thanos but eventually losing. So explaining the spite thing I cannot do. What it comes down to, and why we agree LOM, is Thor will eventually go down via his durability and armor being busted.
KMC Community Forums
May 23rd, 2011 05:09 AM
