i admit not reading quite that much Thor, but in all the times i've read it, not once he has shown superspeed, except maybe in swinging his hammer in circles
Hulk has hit logan often enough, but he always has more trouble tagging him than Wolverine, im not sure if their speed is that apart but hulk doesnt seem all that favored in that regard
I do think Logan is faster. And that Thor's fighting speed is superior to that of the Hulk.
Feel free to prove me wrong. The only feat that might suggest that Thor is faster is the one in which he reacted and threw a punch in a microsecond or something, but I'm not going to change my mind because of one instance.
If you argue someone's fighting speed against anothers take a look at their history and if you realize that one can actually blitz on his own and the other at best
has feats to keep up with people that do so I tend to give the blitzer the upper ahnd in terms of fighting speed.
As a rule of thumb, people that can blitz (and not suprise attack/cheap shot) fights faster than the one's that can't (simple isn't it?). And 1 or 2 time feats don't turn into the norm suddenly.
__________________
I am in your algorithm learning all your mannerisms
I'm already level with God
A million words a second and I know your imperfections, baby
I'm the only future you've got
Speak in diatonics, motivation diabolic
I'm like a religion, better locked in a box
Picture perfect image, more powerful every minute, baby
I am everything that you're not
Gender: Female Location: Poppin Pills on the Rainbow Bridge
lol at telling me what feats i can and cannot use...but
thor proved himself faster than quicksilver when quicksilver dodged his lightning bolt and thor reacted before quicksilver could blitz him, there is also the trench digging feat, he's able to see and fight hermes , he's also used mjolnir to deflect atrillery fire
saying horseman logan was pounded on is accurate but also somewhat misleading; he took a massive beating from hulk during the fight, but his damage soak/durability was so amped that he relentlessly sprung back into the fight with equal ferocity; so much so that hulk became bored/frustrated with the situation & wanted to leave the fight. it didn't seem like there was any end to it.
It's not my clear impression, but objective fact that deathverine was seconds from destroying the hulk, but hesitated & spared him; the hulk was only able to land the blow after logan hesitated, & spared him while resisting apocalypse's programming. as far as feats go, logan nearly destroying hulk is way more impressive than a garden variety ten second KO against a distracted opponent. hulk then super jumped the heck out of there because he knew the danger.
on another note, deathverine was also able to vastly overpower nate grey who is one of the most powerful tk users around.
Last edited by wildernesss on Aug 27th, 2011 at 10:18 AM
^ Context, please. Acting like this feat is a great feat for Wolverine is ridiculous. Your interpretation is jaundiced at best, completely a$$-backwards at worst. We know what happened in this fight. And in terms of relevance, I doubt Hulk is ever going to stab himself (literally) on an amped Wolverine's claws again:
When did Wolverine lose this amp after overpowering Apocalypse control over him. To my knowledge, he only lost the armor. When was it shown that he lost this suppose amp?
taking a brutal beating & ruthless punches from the savage hulk to little effect until after logan voluntarily spares him is a solid feat; especially if you don't consider the hulk's own clumsiness/ineptitude to be a valid reason to disregard the totality of logan's showing here. besides, logan has performed well against hulk in the past...defeating grey hulk twice & fighting toe to toe with the green hulk. so this isn't outside the realm of what one would imagine a amped wolverine would be capable of.