I was reading empire magazine and I dunno if they were joking but I think at one point cap tells hulk to smash, if that happens....I will geekasm all over
Sorry, couldn't help myself. But now that you mention it, maybe a little. Can't really see the ears too well, but the eyes aren't bulging very much. But that could just be because he's angry.. lol. In any case, I think I'd attribute it to poor character design rather than Downs Syndrome.
I still like the design overall, somewhat of an in-between of Hulk and The Incredible Hulk designs. Certainly is better than the rubber-doll-like look of Lee's movie, but not so ripped/veiny as Norton's. Might be my favorite one, will have to see it in the film.
Are you talking about the story? Cos I've grown to like Hulk about as much as I like The Incredible Hulk. I watched Hulk opening night and enjoyed it, but thought it lacked. Upon watching it at home a couple more times, it's really a solid film.
Character design though, The Incredible Hulk is far superior. I still don't care for the rubber-look of Hulk. But it's also what 4-5 years older?
I haven't really taken much time to compare the character design between the two Hulk movies. That didn't interest me as much. I didn't have a problem with Ang Lee's Hulk design. If anything I thought the 2008 version was too focused on having things "look cool," instead of telling an interesting, emotionally gripping story (the director is kind of an immature, young, dorky kid). I found the 2003 Hulk to be much more psychologically appealing. I know it's a little more depressing (perhaps that's the wrong word) in its nature, but that kind of tone appeals to me more, anyway. The performances were much better in Ang Lee's version, I think. Nick Nolte was great. Although, I did really like Liv Tyler, but alas, she couldn't save the movie on her own.