Not being more powerful doesn't mean you can't compare, lol. Lucas himself said Anakin was "as strong" as Sidious. Palpatine himself admits to Dooku in the RotS novel that Anakin is potentially more powerful than himself. Yoda, Mace and various other Jedi recognize Anakin as the probably most powerful Jedi, which is cemented as fact by a variety of objective sources. Whether we're discussing Legends or Canon, that is an indisputable fact.
Where Anakin lags behind in comparison to Sidious is Force knowledge and mastery, though he's quite underrated there. But in anything else, he's in Sheev's league.
George Lucas never said he was more powerful, said he was as powerful. That doesn't mean he'd beat Sidious in a fight though, Sidious is more experienced and masterful.
1.Valkorion is NOT a Sith.Vitiate is.2.Thats..Not true.3.The most important part Valkorion surpasses TPM,CW,ROTS and ROTJ Sidious.DE Sidious=Valkorion.Or DE Sidious=<Valkorion.
He is; he's confirmed to be one. Valk is just bullsh!tting the player by saying he's not a Sith Lord.
Masterful argument... I'm convinced; expect not really. Why would a quote that proclaims Sidious as of TPM as the most OP Sith be false? Because you deem it so?
You have no basis for this other than your personal whims. Canonical quotes put Sidious as early as TPM beating Valkorion, thus he's better than Valkorion even as of that timeframe.
No, there is a canonical statement saying otherwise. From the same source, no less. The one you're thinking of was with context to the species, not the organization.
No, he wasn't at all. The statement confirms what he says.
Lord Vitiate is a Sith.Valkorion is Vitiate post-draining Ziost.TPM Sidious isnt a sh*t compared to either DE Sidious or Valkorion.Vitiate defeated his Sith master at 13 yo.And Valkorion is a sh*t ton stronger than Vitiate.He one-shoted Darth Marr and blocked Arcann's lightsaber strikes with bare hands with no efforts
May 21st, 2017 06:44 AM
